Background Intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp) to pregnant women with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (SP) is widely implemented for the prevention of malaria in pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes. The efficacy of SP is declining and there are concerns that IPTp may have reduced impact in areas of high resistance. Here we sought to determine the protection afforded by SP as part of IPTp against birth outcomes in an area with high levels of SP resistance on the Kenyan coast. Methods A secondary analysis of surveillance data on deliveries at the Kilifi County hospital between 2015 and 2021 was undertaken in an area of low malaria transmission and high parasite mutations associated with SP resistance. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to estimate the effect of SP doses on the risk of low birthweight (LBW) deliveries and stillbirths. Results Among 27,786 deliveries, three or more doses of IPTp-SP were associated with a 27% reduction in the risk of LBW (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.73; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.83; p < 0.001) compared to no-dose. A dose-response association was observed with increasing doses of SP from the second trimester linked to increasing protection against LBW deliveries. Three or more doses of IPTp-SP were also associated with a 21% reduction in stillbirth deliveries (aOR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.65, 0.97; p= 0.044) compared to women who did not take any dose of IPTp-SP. Conclusions The continued, significant association of SP on LBW deliveries suggests that the intervention may have a non-malaria impact on pregnancy outcomes.
Background Understanding spatial variations in health outcomes is a fundamental component in the design of effective, efficient public health strategies. Here we analyse the spatial heterogeneity of low birthweight (LBW) hospital deliveries from a demographic surveillance site on the Kenyan coast. Methods A secondary data analysis on singleton livebirths that occurred between 2011 and 2021 within the rural areas of the Kilifi Health and demographic surveillance system (KHDSS) was undertaken. Individual-level data was aggregated at enumeration zone (EZ) and sub-location level to estimate the incidence of LBW adjusted for accessibility index using the Gravity model. Finally, spatial variations in LBW were assessed using Martin Kulldorf’s spatial scan statistic under Discrete Poisson distribution. Results Access adjusted LBW incidence was estimated as 87 per 1,000 person years in the under 1 population (95% CI: 80, 97) at the sub-location level similar to EZ. The adjusted incidence ranged from 35 to 159 per 1,000 person years in the under 1 population at sub-location level. There were six significant clusters identified at sub-location level and 17 at EZ level using the spatial scan statistic. Conclusions LBW is a significant health risk on the Kenya coast, possibly under-estimated from previous health information systems, and the risk of LBW is not homogenously distributed across areas served by the County hospital.
Background A study was conducted to examine the impact of long-lasting insecticide-treated net (LLIN) use on the prevalence of malaria infections across all ages, 25 y after a trial of insecticide-treated nets was conducted in the same area along the Kenyan coast. Methods The study comprised four community-based infection surveys and a simultaneous 12-month surveillance at six government outpatient health facilities (March 2018–February 2019). Logistic regression was used to examine the effect of LLIN use on malaria infections across all ages. Results There was a high level of reported LLIN use by the community (72%), notably among children <5 y of age (84%). Across all ages, the adjusted odds ratio of LLIN use against asymptomatic parasitaemia in community surveys was 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36 to 0.57; p<0.001) and against fevers associated with infection presenting to health facilities was 0.63 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.68; p<0.001). Conclusions There was significant protection of LLIN use against malaria infections across all ages.
Delivery of oral PrEP, a potent HIV prevention intervention, has begun within public health systems in many countries in Africa. Training as many health providers as possible expeditiously is necessary to efficiently and rapidly scale up PrEP delivery among at risk populations and thereby realize the greatest impact of PrEP. We designed and implemented an innovative on-site modular training approach delivered in five two-hour modules. The modules could be covered in two consecutive days or be broken across several days enabling flexibility to accommodate health provider work schedules. We assessed knowledge gain comparing pre-and post-training test scores and determined monthly PrEP uptake for six months following the training intervention. We also evaluated the cost of this training approach and conducted key informant interviews to explore acceptability among health providers. Between January 2019 and December 2020, 2111 health providers from 104 health facilities were trained on PrEP. Of 1821 (83%) providers who completed both pre- and post-tests, 505 (28%) were nurses, 333 (18%) were HIV counsellors, 276 (15%) were clinical officers and 255 (14%) were lay providers. The mean score prior to and after training was 58% and 82% respectively (p <0.001). On average, health facilities initiated an average of 2.7 (SD 4.7) people on PrEP each month after the training, a number that did not decline over six months post-training (p = 0.62). Assuming Ministry of Health costs, the costs per provider trained was $16.27. Health providers expressed satisfaction with this training approach because it enabled many providers within a facility receive training. On-site modular training is an effective approach for improving PrEP education for health workers in public health facilities, It is also acceptable and low-cost. This method of training can be scaled up to rapidly amplify the number of health workers able to offer PrEP services.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.