No abstract

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh kecemasan matematis terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian kuantitatif dengan tujuan untuk menguji hipotesis yang telah ditetapkan dan desain penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian korelasional. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah cluster random sampling yang menghasilkan kelas X IPS 1 di SMA Negeri 1 Cisaat menjadi subjek penelitian dengan sampel berjumlah 30 siswa dari populasi 120 siswa. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah instrumen tes hasil belajar matematika dan instrumen angket kecemasan matematis. Uji instrumen berupa validas isi, validitas, reliabilitas, daya pembeda, dan tingkat kesukaran. Metode pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui tes dan angket. Teknik analisis data yang dilakukan adalah analisis skala likert dan uji analisis regresi linear sederhana. Berdasarkan analisis regresi linear sederhana diperoleh = 162,50 − 1,80 yang artinya nilai sebesar 162,50. Nilai ini mengindentifikasikan bahwa bila tidak terdapat kecemasan matematis maka nilai hasil belajar matematika sebesar 162,50. Nilai sebesar −1,80 artinya setiap penambahan 1% tingkat kecemasan matematis maka hasil belajar matematika akan menurun sebesar 1,80, begitupun sebaliknya. Karena koefisen regresi bernilai negatif, hasil tersebut menunjukan adanya pengaruh negatif antara kecemasan matematis siswa terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa. Kata kunci : kecemasan matematis dan hasil belajar matematika ABSTRACTThis research is aimed to identify the effect of mathematics anxiety towards mathematics learning outcomes. The method used in this research is quantitative research method which is purposed to examine the decided hypothesis, and research design used is correlational research. Sample collection technique used is cluster random sampling which resulted Class X SOCIAL SCIENCE 1 in SMA Negeri (State Senior High School) 1 Cisaat became the research subject within samples counted 30 students from the population counted 120 students that was divided to four classes. The instrument used in this research is an instrument to test mathematics learning outcomes and an instrument in the shape of mathematics anxiety questionnaire. The instruments were tested by validating the content validity, the validity, the reliability, the discrimination index, and the difficulty index. Data collection method was carried out through the test and the questionnaire. Data analysis technique which was carried out was Likert Scale analysis and test for simple linear regression analysis. Based on simple linear regression analysis, y = 162.50-1.80x, which means a value of 162.50. This value identifies that if there is no mathematical anxiety, the value of mathematics learning outcomes is 162.50. B value of -1.80 means that every 1% increase in the level of mathematical anxiety, the mathematics learning outcomes will decrease by 1.80, and vice versa. Because the regression coefficient is negative, these results indicate a negative...

The purpose of this study was to describe the validity of the metacognition ability instruments which include metacognition knowledge and metacognition awareness. The metacognition knowledge instrument in the form of essay tests totaling 20 items, while the metacognition awareness instrument is the Metacognition Awareness Inventory (MAI). This study is a descriptive qualitative study to assess and obtain the quality of metacognition knowledge and metacognition awareness instruments that are valid to characterize student metacognition abilities. The instrument of student metacognition knowledge was validated by two physics educations’ experts, the instrument of metacognition knowledge was also empirically validated by involving 30 physics education students as respondents. Unlike the instrument of metacognition knowledge, the metacognition awareness instrument is only empirically validated by involving 90 students across the study program as respondents. The results showed: (1) the validator's assessment of the metacognition knowledge instrument both from the content validity aspect and construct validity was valid categorized (range of scores> 3.6) and reliable for the two components of assessment in a row namely Percentage of agreement = 97.3% and 98.6%, (2) the empirical validity of the metacognition knowledge instrument was declared valid (Pearson Correlation > rtable) and reliable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.944), (3) the instrument of metacognition awareness was declared reliable (0.6 ≤ α ≤ 1.0) although some components of the student metacognition awareness instrument are empirically declared invalid. These results indicate that the instrument of metacognition ability is valid to use in characterizing the prospective physics teacher students’ metacognition ability.

The problem of infertility is still a health problem that has not been fully resolved due to various factors that cause this infertility. Infertility also affects the psychology of a married couple where they do not have offspring, which is one of the goals of marriage. So this study aims to study and analyze infertility in infertile couples in the city of Makassar. This research was conducted in the city of Makassar and the time of the study will be held from February to April 2018, during which time primary data collection will be carried out. This study uses qualitative research methods with a phenomenological approach. The informants of this study were four pairs of ordinary informants and / or supporters and one key informant. Data collection techniques using in-depth interviews, observation and documentation. Data analysis using component analysis (content). The results of the study showed that sexual activity, sexual arousal, or interest in sexual intercourse by a married couple during the infertility period did not experience interference and anxiety in infertile couples seems to know at the outset that they have infertility. The conclusion of this study was that the impact of infertility on sexuality experienced was not felt, sexual relations between married couples did not experience problems. As well as the impact of infertility on anxiety in infertile couples appear at the beginning to know that they are infertile, those feelings arise because of the desire to have offspring.

Tujuan penelitian dan pengembangan ini adalah: (1) mengetahui karakteristik modul berbasis inkuiri terbimbing pada materi sistem gerak pada manusia; (2) menguji kelayakan modul berbasis inkuiri terbimbing pada materi Sistem Gerak pada manusia; (3) menguji keefektivan modul berbasis inkuiri terbimbing pada materi Sistem Gerak Manusia. Penelitian dan pengembangan modul ajar menggunakan prosedur modifikasi Borg & Gall (1983) yang telah dimodifikasi menjadi sembilan tahapan: (1) tahap penelitian dan pengumpulan informasi; (2) tahap perencanaan;(3) tahap pengembangan rancangan awal produk; (4) tahap uji coba lapangan permulaan; (5) tahap revisi produk tahap pertama; (6) tahap uji lapangan terbatas; (7) tahap revisi produk tahap kedua; (8) tahap uji lapangan operasional; (9) tahap revisi produk akhir. Uji lapangan awal dilakukan di SMA Negeri 2 Wera. Uji lapangan operasional dilakukan di SMA Negeri 1 Wera. Teknik Pengumpulan Data melalui angket, observasi dan tes. Jenis data yang diperoleh adalah data kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Data kualitatif diperoleh dari hasil wawancara & saran saat uji lapangan. Data kuantitatif diperoleh dari penilaian validasi modul oleh ahli, uji lapangan operasional dan tes hasil belajar. Efektivitas modul diperoleh dari perbedaan hasil parameter estimasi pengetahuan, sikap dan keterampilan pada uji lapangan operasional dalam setting kuasi eksperimen dengan menggunakan modul biologi berbasis inkuiri terbimbing (eksperimen) dan yang menggunakan buku ajar sekolah (kontrol) pada materi Sistem Gerak Manusia. Hasil penelitian dan pengembangan menunjukkan: (1) produk modul biologi berbasis inkuiri terbimbing dikembangkan berdasarkan aktivitas inkuiri terbimbing; (2) kelayakan modul biologi berbasis inkuiri terbimbing pada materi Sistem Gerak manusia berdasarkan penilaian dari ahli materi soal berkategori "sangat baik (95.83%)", ahli pengembangan modul ajar berkategori "baik (76.78%)", ahli pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran berkategori "sangat baik ( 96.35%)", dan ahli praktisi bahasa berkategori "baik (77.77%)", penilaian dari praktisi pendidikan berkategori "sangat baik (95.77%)" dan penilaian dari siswa berkategori "baik (84.99%)"; (3) Modul biologi berbasis inkuiri terbimbing efektif meningkatkan hasil belajar, karena berdasarkan hasil uji Anacova menunjukkan adanya perbedaan hasil posttest antara kelas kontrol dan kelas eksperimen dengan F Tabel (0.05) = 2.30 < F Hitung (0.05: 2) = 24.9.