Purpose: This study aimed to determine the difference between the level of sexual satisfaction in breast cancer patients with Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) and Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS). Methods: This study used a cross-sectional study using a validated Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire. This study was conducted from 2020 until 2021. Data were collected and analyzed using the chi-square test for bivariate variables and logistic regression for multivariate variables. Results: Patients with BCS were more satisfied with their sexual activity than patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (p = 0.0001, OR 6.25, CI = 2.78 – 14.01). Other factors having effect on sexual satisfactions were: age that showed a statistically effect on sexual satisfaction (patients <55 years were more satisfied than patients ≥55 years ( p = 0.004, OR = 3.23, CI 1.44 – 7.22), the period after operation (<5 years vs >5 years) showed a statistically significant difference in sexual satisfaction ( p = 0.087, OR=0.53, CI = 0.25-1.10), Having chemotherapy treatment showed statistically significant risk for sexual satisfaction (p = 0.003, OR=7.39, CI= 1.62-33.83). Factors having no statistically significant effect on sexual satisfactions were: Radiotherapy treatment (p = 0.133, OR=1.75 and CI = 0.84 -3.64), length of marriage as defined with <10 years and > 10 years (p = 0.616, OR=1.39 and CI = 0.38-5.09), marital status (p = 0.082, OR =0.39, CI=0,13 – 1.16), educational status (p = 0.778, OR = 1.18, CI = 0.37 – 3.75), and work at home vs outside home (p = 0.117, OR=1.8, and CI = 0.86 – 3.78). Conclusion: BCS as surgical therapy option is the most dominant factor related to sexual satisfaction followed by age group, and chemotherapy group.
Background: The novel coronavirus known as SARS-CoV-2 has spread worldwide and caused the COVID-19 pandemic. In September 2020, more than 32 million confirmed cases of COVID-19, with a death toll of more than 990,000. Among COVID-19 patients, those with cancer had worse outcomes than those without malignancy, but in some studies, the mortality rates differed significantly, ranging from 3.7% to 61.5%. Method: In this descriptive study, survival analysis with the Kaplan Meier curve was used to determine the healing rate of patients with cancer exposed to COVID-19 and undergoing treatment at dr. Moewardi General Hospital Surakarta-Indonesia from February to December 2020, and the Log Rank test was used to analyze data on two related groups. Results: The analysis using the Kaplan Meier method, female patients were found to have a higher survival rate than females, paged less than 50 years had a higher survival rate than those aged > 51 years, breast cancer had the lowest survival rate, and comorbidity of anemia had a higher survival rate than those with other comorbidities. The Log Rank test found a significant difference in the cumulative survival rates of cancer patients with COVID-19 with a p-value of 0.010 for comorbidity types. Meanwhile, from gender (p = 0.632), age (p = 0.672), type of cancer (p = 0.472), there was no significant difference. Conclusion: COVID-19 female patients aged less than 50 years with types of malignancy other than breast cancer and comorbidity of anemia have a higher survival rate..
Introduction: Placenta previa and morbidly adherent placenta cause significant maternal morbidity and mortality from postpartum hemorrhage. Intra-aortic balloon occlusion has been shown to reduce intraoperative hemorrhage effectively. Cases Presentation We reported four cases of women who underwent cesarean section and hysterectomy with IABO. All four were multigravida, gestational age range was 37-39 weeks, MAP score range 6-8. Ultrasound examination showed placenta accreta. After the cesarean section and hysterectomy procedure with IABO, the bleeding was 600-800 cc. Conclusions Intra-Aortic Ballooning Occlusion is an effective method to reduce bleeding complications during and after cesarean section in pregnancies with placenta accreta.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.