Background Breast cancer remains the most common cause of cancer related mortality amongst women in Pakistan. Postoperative complications can demoralize the patients and potentially delay adjuvant treatment, leading to adverse outcomes. The overarching aim of the study is to delineate the early postoperative outcomes of breast cancer surgery in Pakistan. Materials and Methods A retrospective study involving patients who underwent breast cancer surgery from June 2016 to December 2019 was conducted. Perioperative morbidities (30 days) were evaluated and documented. The results obtained were analyzed using the SPSS 23 software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY). Results A total of 94 patients were included in the study, with the mean age of 50±12.8 years. Breast conserving surgery was performed in 32% (n=31) of the patients, while the remaining 68% (n=63) underwent modified radical mastectomy. The most common complications were seroma formation, flap necrosis and hematoma formation and were observed in 5.3% (n=5), 4.3% (n=4) and 3.2% (n=3) of the patients, respectively. Conclusion Early postoperative complications can delay the commencement of adjuvant systemic therapy required for further management of breast cancer. These complications elicit equally grave consequences for patients undergoing breast conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy.
Background Affections of the gallbladder remain exceedingly ubiquitous and often warrant surgical intervention. The histopathological patterns represent a spectrum, ranging from cholecystitis to gallbladder carcinoma. The present study aims to delineate the occurrence of various gallbladder histopathologies in a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan.
The urachal sinus is a vestigial remnant that ensues in the aftermath of incomplete obliteration of the embryonic urachus. Urachal sinuses often remain asymptomatic, being discovered incidentally in instances where they are complicated with a superimposed infection or abscess. Due to their rare occurrence in adults, urachal sinuses are rarely included in the list of differential diagnosis surrounding umbilical pain in adult patients. We hereby delineate a unique case of a urachal sinus in a 26-year-old male patient. Due to the presence of an abscess in a hirsute male, a presumptive diagnosis of an umbilical pilonidal sinus was suspected. However, further diagnostic workup divulged an unequivocal diagnosis of a urachal sinus complicated by an abscess formation.
Background Laparoscopic surgery is becoming the gold standard for most abdominal surgeries in recent times. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer (PDU), however, is still an area of debate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic repair of PDU versus open repair. Methods In this cross-sectional study, patients were consecutively sampled. Out of 101 patients with clinically diagnosed PDU, 36 patients underwent laparoscopic Graham patch repair and 65 underwent open Graham patch repair in a tertiary care academic hospital. Open repair was via upper midline incision, and laparoscopic repair by the three-port technique. The following stages were calculated: operative time, duration of postoperative analgesia, time taken to mobilize, and patient length of stay after the operation. Results The mean operative time was somewhat longer in the laparoscopy group compared to the open repair group (74.01 vs 56.17 minutes, respectively). Mean postoperative analgesia requirement, time taken to mobilize, and hospital stay were significantly shorter after laparoscopy than after open repair (1.21 days, 9.32 hours, and 3.12 days vs 3.83 days, 16.20 hours, and 4.85 days, respectively). Three patients (8%) in the laparoscopy group and 35 (54%) in the open repair group had postoperative complications. Conclusions Laparoscopic repair of PDU is a safe approach and better than open repair in terms of operative time with the right level of expertise only, postoperative analgesia requirement, mobilization, duration of hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative respiratory and wound complications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.