The existence of the yellow book is very important for Islamic boarding schools or dayahs in Aceh. Every religious lesson must use the yellow book as the main reference for teachers in teaching. The yellow book has been used for centuries in the study of dayah. However, the existence of internet media in the current digital era has an effect on learning patterns in the dayah environment. The yellow book as a learning resource in the dayah faces the challenges of the digital era media that is able to answer various people's problems quickly. In the digital era, the public and students can access information related to Islamic teachings via the internet quickly, cheaply and easily. The purpose of this study is to find out and describe the existence of the yellow book in the digital era (study in dayah aceh). This research is a field research with a qualitative descriptive method. The results show that the yellow book still exists in the current digital era and remains a mandatory reference in the dayah curriculum, but the progress of the digital era continues to color the pesantren curriculum treasures with the finding that Guree Dayah uses the Maktabah Syamilah feature as a supporting reference. Furthermore, in responding to advances in information technology, dayah utilizes the internet as a medium of da'wah and socialization of dayah as well as reviewing legal issues encountered by the public on the internet by referring to the yellow book

No-Fault Divorce is a legal rule in divorce which implies that when a couple wants to divorce, then both of them do not need to prove the cause or reason for their divorce in court. They simply emphasize that there is no match between the two, or that there are differences that cannot be compromised anymore. This notion first appeared in California in 1970 and has been used in Indonesia as one of the judges' material legal considerations in divorce cases. The use of the No-Fault Divorce legal rule as one of the reinforcements for judges' considerations is considered in line with or in accordance with the values ​​contained in the school of fiqh. However, making the No-Fault Divorce the judge's main consideration in deciding divorce cases or generalizing each divorce case using the rule of law is considered not in line with the purpose of shariah (maqāṣid) marriage in fiqh.The method used in this comparative descriptive study was analyzed qualitatively by comparing the understanding of the concept of the No-Fault Divorce legal rule and its use in the Religious Courts in Indonesia with the values ​​contained in the school of fiqh. The data that became the object of research were several judges' decisions which directly included the No-Fault Divorce legal rules and fiqh books of schools of thought by scholars.The No-Fault Divorce legal rule is less relevant and in line with fiqh values ​​although it can speed up the judicial process. However, knowing the cause of divorce without generalizing the issue will make the process of why the decision was enforced clearer and it will be clearer who is wrong and who is right so that the legal justice of a decision can be seen. Because usually this divorce decision will be the basis for determining other decisions related to rights in the family such as the right to determine child custody and joint property rights and so on. Moreover, the occurrence of divorce is not a trivial matter without any basis, because marriage is something sacred in religion and in Indonesian society. Abstrak: No-Fault Divorce adalah suatu kaidah hukum dalam perceraian yang mengandung maksud bahwa ketika suatu pasangan ingin bercerai, maka keduanya tidak perlu membuktikan sebab atau alasan mereka bercerai didepan pengadilan. Mereka cukup menegaskan bahwa di antara keduanya sudah tidak ada kecocokan, atau terdapat perbedaan yang tidak dapat dikompromikan lagi. Paham ini pertama sekali muncul di California tahun 1970 dan telah digunakan di Indonesia sebagai salah satu pertimbangan hukum materiil hakim dalam perkara perceraian. Penggunaan kaidah hukum No-Fault Divorce sebagai salah satu penguat pertimbangan hakim dianggap sejalan atau sesuai dengan nilai-nilai yang terkandung dalam fiqh mazhab. Namun demikian menjadikan No-Fault Divorce sebagai pertimbangan utama hakim dalam memutuskan perkara perceraian atau menyamaratakan setiap kasus perceraian dengan menggunakan kaidah hukum ini dianggap tidak sejalan dengan tujuan pensyariatan (maqāṣid) pernikahan dalam fiqih. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini deskriptif komparatif yang dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan cara membandingkan pemahaman konsep kaidah hukum No-Fault Divorce dan penggunaannya pada Pengadilan Agama di Indonesia dengan nilai-nilai yang terkandung dalam fiqh mazhab. Data yang menjadi objek penelitian adalah beberapa putusan hakim yang mencantumkan langsung kaidah hukum No-Fault Divorce dan kitab-kitab fiqh mazhab karya ulama. Kaidah hukum No-Fault Divorce ini kurang relevan dan sejalan dengan nilai-nilai fiqh meskipun dapat mempercepat proses peradilan. Bagaimanapun mengetahui sebab perceraian tanpa menyamaratakan persoalan akan lebih jelas proses mengapa putusan itu diberlakukan dan dan lebih jelas siapa yang salah dan siapa yang benar sehingga terlihat keadilan hukum dari suatu putusan. Karena biasanya putusan perceraian ini akan menjadi dasar bagi penetapan putusan lain terkait dengan hak-hak dalam keluarga seperti hak penetapan hak asuh anak maupun hak harta bersama dan lain sebagainya. Lebih dari itu  terjadinya perceraian bukanlah hal yang sepele yang tanpa dasar, karena pernikahan merupakan suatu yang sakral dalam agama dan dalam masyarakat Indonesia. Kata Kunci: No-Fault Divorce, Pertimbangan Hakim, Fiqh Mazhab

This study examines the risk rate of Angin Puting Beliung in Semarang of Central Java. The Angin Puting Beliung is a local designation for small-scale tornadoes that occur in Indonesia, originates from differences in pressure of a weather system, leads to strong winds. Between January 2014 and December 2018, the occurrence of Angin Puting Beliung in Semarang city of Central Java reached 91 times with a total financial loss of around IDR 852,500,000 (USD 60,000). High population densities and settlements without being followed by control of spatial use and land-use change make Semarang more at risk of being hit by a tornado. This study specifically aims to determine the level of physical, social, and economic vulnerability as well as to analyze the risk level of Angin Puting Beliung in Semarang city. The survey is used as the main method in this study. Samples were taken to represent the population namely land cover, slope, and land surface air temperature with data analysis using a weighted tiered quantitative method to answer the purpose of knowing the distribution of hazard and vulnerability areas and analysis of the results of mathematical calculations to determine the risk of Angin Puting Beliung. The results obtained show that Semarang city has a high hazard level of 28,502% which is mostly found in the southwest and northeast of Semarang. High levels of vulnerability are in the sub-districts of West Semarang, Mijen, Gunung Pati, and Tembalang. The risk level with a high class ranks the least, namely from other classes with a distribution in the sub-district of Tugu and Tembalang, accounted at 16.294%.

The devastation caused by the December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami opened access for many different organizations to enter Aceh to conduct disaster relief operations. This paper examines the role of one such actor, the Islamic organization Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI). Through its humanitarian work, including the provision of relief aid, medical care, and trauma healing, HTI pursued its political-religious vision of ‘caliphatization’, the restoration of a global Caliphate and the implementation of Islamic law. Because Islam was already a dominant feature of the Acehnese context with the vast majority of Acehnese declaring a Muslim identity, the case of HTI's disaster relief work was one of intra-religious proselytization to proximate others. Even so, HTI's project was intended to be transformative. However, while the disaster clearly provided an opening for HTI to expand its work in Aceh, and while HTI experienced significant growth in the region as a consequence, its wider project of ‘caliphatization’ failed to resonate with political elites and has had little impact on political processes. This paper analyses HTI's disaster relief work and assesses the reasons for both its rapid growth and limited political impact.

This paper examines the governance of forced migration in Southeast Asia. The region hosts about 2.5 million of forcibly displaced migrants from a worldwide total of 70 million (2018). The migrants include intra- ASEAN and non-ASEAN refugees or asylum seekers, notably from the Middle East.  Based on a review of recent literature, the paper investigates three main destination states in SEA that host the majority of the forced migrants; Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. The paper examines (i) local policies in the governance of forced migrants and (2) the practice of non-refoulement principle. The findings reveal that in terms of forced migration governance, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand are ‘same but different'; meaning that despite being similar, each country produces different outcomes.