Pemisahan agama dan kepercayaan dalam konstitusi adalah suatu kebijakan yang menimbulkan beragam permasalahan. Seringkali para penghayat kepercayaan mengalami intimidasi ataupun hal-hal lain yang mengganggu pelaksanaan hak sipilnya untuk menganut dan mengamalkan ajaran kepercayaan yang dianutnya. Dengan dalih kepercayaan bukan agama, para pelaku anarkisme seringkali melakukan pelarangan dan kekerasan terhadap para penganut kepercayaan. Kajian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Sedangkan hasil penelitiannya ialah bahwa 1) Alasan hukum pemisahan pengaturan antara agama dengan aliran kepercayaan disebabkan oleh politik pembedaan pendefinisian keduanya dimana kepercayaan diamsusikan sebagai tradisi dan ajaran luhur masyarakat yang bersumber dari budaya yang keberadaannya di luar agama. 2) Pemisahan agama dan kepercayaan berakibat hukum tidak diakuinya aliran kepercayaan sebagai agama resmi negara, padahal status aliran kepercayaan merupakan agama lokal yang diyakini sebagai agama oleh para penganutnya. Pemisahan ini juga mengakibatkan hadirnya beragam sikap diskriminatif yang berpotensi mengganggu dan merampas hak setiap warga negara dalam meyakini suatu agama, dalam hal ini hak beragama yang diganggu dan dirampas ialah hak untuk meyakini agama lokal sebagai agama warisan leluhur bangsa Indonesia. The separation of religion and indigenous religion in the constitution is a policy that causes various problems. Often the beliefs of the indigenous religion are intimidating or other things that interfere with the exercise of civil rights to embrace and put into practice the beliefs embraced. Under the pretext of non-religious convictions, the perpetrators of anarchism often make prohibitions and violence against believers. This research uses normative legal methods. The results of the research are: The first, the legal reason for the separation of rules between religion and indigeneous religion is caused by the politics of defining both of them in which beliefs are interpreted as traditions and noble teachings of society originating from cultures which are outside of religion; The second, that the separation of religion and indigenous religion that is caused in the law does not recognize the indigenous religion as the official religion of the state, while the status of the indigenous religion is a local religion that is considered as a religion by his believers. This separation also makes several of discriminatory attitudes come up to have potency in disrupting and robbing every citizen’s right to believe in a religion. In this case, the right which is bullied is the right to believe in local religion as the religion of the Indonesian ancestral heritage.

This state is basically recognized as a rich state, either in term of ecological side or in term of cultural potency and ideological varieties, as the inheritance of motherland. However, this is so sad when we ironically saw a bunch of tragedies which are tragically occurred, start from tsunami, and other issues such as the scandal of century that seems to be unsolved! Moreover, nowadays, the environmental problem has occurred and reached its highest culmination point. The environmental destruction and pollution process have uncontrollably happened. Noting so many catastrophes happened anywhere in this state; such as floods, landslides, earthquakes, lapindo mud tragedy, roads vanishing, illegal logging, forest function shift, and many others, is so an ironic thing. These all catastrophes become such a sign  of  inharmonic  relationship exist between the state, human and the environment. Then, should we always blame these disaster s for the governments’ fault that, in such this multidimensional crises and demoralization that full of utopia and ironical images, seems to be unaware of their main position? The law is neutered and naked from its constitutional essence. This terrible condition can be impossibly happened when our representatives in the government are loyally take taken a side of the important of their party through the political campaign appointments which seem to face stagnation in its implementation and not loyal to the true mandator. Perceiving this such phenomenon, we need not only a kind of law penetratin that progressifely and integratifally can become an elegant problem solving for achieving of the aims of ongoing developmnet that  can fully protect the importance of the environment and human life intentions but a moral forces and people power that should be continuallly implemented. Hence, the urgency of law management, ecological tutorial awaraness and the success of environmetal living management in term of national law development, becomes a final destination of this writting. Moreover , this writing is a kcorrection of the unclear control and maintenanceof the law of environmental   administration.

The occurrence of several land ownership claims for salt ponds in several areas in Pamekasan initiated the Community Service Team to carry out legal counseling activities related to the importance of certifying ownership rights to salt pond land belonging to salt farmers in Pagagan Village, Pademawu District, Pamekasan Regency for which currently still has the status of girik land. This activity uses the method of presenting material about the urgency and benefits of land certification, as well as providing assistance to the community in the process of land certification. The results obtained in this community service activity are increasing public understanding regarding the importance of salt pond land certification. This activity provides benefits for the community to avoid ownership disputes over salt pond land.