The limited access to land, particularly for the community around the forest contributed to deforestation in Indonesia. This problem drives the emergence of social forestry. In fact, the implementation of social forestry in some cases could not be done sustainably. The research was conducted to identify the determinants of sustainable social forestry and analyze the implementation of sustainable social forestry in Hutan Desa Wanagiri, Bali. The analysis is carried out using Analysis Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The study was conducted from December 2017 – May 2018. Based on the results of the study, three main principles were used to evaluate the management of Hutan Desa Wanagiri, namely the principle of sustainable environment (environmental aspects), improvement of community welfare (socio-economic aspects), and improvement of forest governance (institutional aspects). Based on the AHP results regarding the three principles, the level of sustainability of Hutan Desa Wanagiri for the environmental aspects is 49,9%, and then 62,7% for socio-economic aspect and 51% for institutional aspects. Overall, the level of sustainability of Hutan Desa Wanagiri is equal to 54,4% and classified as “moderate sustainable'. Keywords: environment, Hutan Desa, institutional, socio-economic, sustainability

No abstract

Cibaduyut leather shoe center is the idol of domestic tourists when visiting Bandung. The influx of shoes made in China and the Covid-19 pandemic over the past two years have resulted in the shoe industry experiencing a significant decline in sales. Sales of shoes were almost zero because shoes were a secondary necessity, and restrictions on people's movement resulted in a drastic decrease in demand for shoes. This research aims to get solutions to survive in crisis and take advantage of every opportunity for micro-enterprises in Cibaduyut Shoes Center, Bandung. The research method used is descriptive qualitative; data collection is carried out through surveys, interviews, and observations of shoe entrepreneurs in Cibaduyut. The results showed that many companies should need to be closed, because the income was not feasible, while fixed costs could not be reduced. Companies can only survive by relying on sales of available products, production stops, difficulties, increases in raw material prices, uncertain labor costs, manual production with existing machines, the substitution of leather material with imitations, innovation stops, and online marketing not be done. The conclusions showed that companies could reduce fixed costs and take advantage of small opportunities.