Legal protection for the majority shareholders is sufficiently guaranteed, especially through the mechanism of the RUPS, but this is not the case for minority shareholders, thus creating an injustice problem for minority shareholders. The purpose of this study is to uncover and find out legal protection for minority shareholders in a limited liability company based on Pancasila justice. This research is normative juridical so it uses secondary data with the law approach and qualitative data analysis. The results showed that the General Meeting of Shareholders did not reflect legal protection for minority shareholders, because in every decision making through the General Meeting of Shareholders and various other decisions based on the attendance quorum about the majority of votes present at the General Meeting of Shareholders. Such matter is detrimental to the interests of minority shareholders because without the presence of minority shareholders, a General Meeting of Shareholders can be held, while minority shareholders also have the same rights and obligations and responsibilities. The majority of shareholders hold a large and full control over the company, resulting in minority shareholders, there is no guarantee to get justice based on Pancasila justice. Therefore, the General Meeting of Shareholders must be held if attended by all shareholders with voting rights present or represented. If this is not the case, the results of the General Meeting of Shareholders may be canceled.

Life nation and society in Indonesia must be based on dimensions of culture so that own value system (value system) is something based on life balance between the interests of society and law, meaning the creation of law aims to guard the interest whole society like done by lawyers. Topic about How the role of the advocate in enforcement law? as well as discuss How analysis culture law as a value system for an advocate in enforcement law? become formula necessary problem discussed and analyzed in writing scientific this. The method of the study This wear kind of juridical normative, that is by conducting a number of studies on regulation legislation as well as references other For can facilitate the explanation process of culture law for advocating in progress enforcement law. Findings from discussion study This found that culture law for advocate in enforcement law is profession independent, free, and responsible answer To become an enforcer required law protection and guarantee from the country so Indonesian lawyers can help in a manner law society in need help law without exists discrimination belief, religion, descent, ethnicity, position social or belief politics.

The rise of online fraud practices with investment mode in DKI Jakarta is influenced by 2 (two) factors, namely the community's ignorance about investment through the online platform. Other factors are not yet optimal for law enforcement to take preventative measures by informing the public about the dangers of online investment.The purpose of this research is to better understand the legal interpretation of online fraud cases with investment mode. Another goal is for the public to be more careful with online investment offers that promise multiple benefits.The research approach is the legal sociology approach. Observations indicate that law enforcement by the National Police against suspected online investment fraud has not been carried out optimally because investigators only use the articles of the Criminal Code and the ITE Law. But not using Law Number 42/2009, and Law Number 25/2007, investigators must also immediately break the chain of online fraud practices.Keywords : Legal Interpretation, Online Fraud, Investment Mode.ABSTRAKMaraknya praktek penipuan online dengan modus investasi di DKI Jakarta dipengaruhi 2 (dua) faktor yaitu faktor ketidaktahuan masyarakat perihal investasi melalui platform online. Faktor lainnya belum optimalnya penegak hukum untuk melakukan langkah pencegahan dengan mensosialisasikan kepada masyarakat mengenai bahayanya investasi online.Tujuan penelitian ingin lebih memahami penafsiran hukum perkara penipuan online dengan modus investasi. Tujuan lainnya agar masyarakat lebih berhati-hati dengan penawaran investasi online yang menjanjikan keuntungan berlipat ganda.Pendekatan penelitian yaitu pendekatan Sosiologi hukum. Hasil pengamatan menunjukkan bahwa penegakan hukum oleh Polri terhadap tersangka penipuan investasi online, belum berlangsung optimal karena penyidik hanya menggunakan pasal-pasal KUHP dan Undang-Undang ITE. Namun tidak menggunakan Undang-Undang Nomor 42/2009, dan Undang-Undang Nomor 25/2007, penyidik juga harus segera memutus mata rantai praktek penipuan online tersebut.Kata kunci: Interpetasi Hukum, Penipuan Online, Modus Investasi.

Maraknya praktek penipuan online dengan modus investasi di DKI Jakarta dipengaruhi 2 (dua) faktor yaitu faktor ketidaktahuan masyarakat perihal investasi melalui platform online. Faktor lainnya belum optimalnya penegak hukum untuk melakukan langkah pencegahan dengan mensosialisasikan kepada masyarakat mengenai bahayanya investasi online. Tujuan penelitian ingin lebih memahami penafsiran hukum perkara penipuan online dengan modus investasi. Tujuan lainnya agar masyarakat lebih berhati-hati dengan penawaran investasi online yang menjanjikan keuntungan berlipat ganda. Pendekatan penelitian yaitu pendekatan Sosiologi hukum. Hasil pengamatan menunjukkan bahwa penegakan hukum oleh Polri terhadap tersangka penipuan investasi online, belum berlangsung optimal karena penyidik hanya menggunakan pasal-pasal KUHP dan Undang-Undang ITE. Namun tidak menggunakan Undang-Undang Nomor 42/2009, dan Undang-Undang Nomor 25/2007, penyidik juga harus segera memutus mata rantai praktek penipuan online tersebut.