We have investigated 296 inpatients in a single-blind observer study to determine the incidence, degree and duration of hypoxaemia during anaesthesia. The clinical recognition of hypoxaemia, period of time until recognition and risk factors were studied. Oxygen saturation (Spo2) was monitored continuously with a pulse oximeter (Ohmeda, model 3700). One or more episodes of mild hypoxaemia (Spo2 86-90%) were recorded in 53% of patients. Severe hypoxaemia with Spo2 values less than 81% were recorded in 20% of patients. The mild hypoxaemic episodes lasted up to 34.6 min (mean 2.3 min) and 70% were not detected by the anaesthetist. In the remaining 30% of episodes, the anaesthetist diagnosed the complication with a mean time delay of 70 s. After intervention a mean time delay of 57 s was recorded until Spo2 exceeded 90%. Utilizing a stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis, we found that risk factors associated with a greater incidence of hypoxaemia were patient age (P less than 0.005) and anaesthetic technique (P less than 0.00001). We conclude that hypoxaemic episodes in our operating rooms are common during anaesthesia and suggest preoxygenation in all patients in addition to administration of supplementary oxygen during arousal from anaesthesia and during transfer to the recovery room.

No abstract

In a randomized, blinded clinical study, we have used objective and subjective measures to determine if perioperative monitoring with pulse oximetry--by virtue of its potential to lessen hypoxaemia--would decrease late postoperative cognitive dysfunction. We investigated 736 adult patients undergoing elective procedures (other than cardiac, neurosurgical or for cancer) under regional or general anaesthesia, allocated randomly to undergo (group I) or not to undergo (group II) pulse oximetry monitoring in the operating theatre and recovery room. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Wechsler memory scale (WMS) and continuous reaction time (RT) test the day before surgery, and on the 7th day after operation or at discharge if that occurred before postoperative day 7. A questionnaire sent 6 weeks after surgery elicited patients' subjective perceptions regarding cognitive abilities. There were no significant differences between the two groups in either the total WMS score, the score for each WMS subtests or RT test. The questionnaire revealed that 7% in group I and 11% in group II believed cognitive abilities had decreased (ns). For the 40 patients whose WMS scores were 10 points less after than before operation, a follow-up study was undertaken 3 months after surgery. At that time, the median WMS score had returned to the preoperative value. We conclude that, for these 736 patients, subjective and objective measures did not indicate less postoperative cognitive impairment after perioperative monitoring with pulse oximetry.

Anaphylactic shock was difficult to diagnose and no structured plans were used for the treatment in the simulated incident in this study.

No abstract