No abstract

BACKGROUND Adjuvant computed tomography-based conformal electron beam radiation therapy (RT) for patients with keloids enables radiation oncologists to customize the target volume with precision and deliver the maximal prescription dose while sparing normal surrounding tissues. OBJECTIVE To report treatment and cosmetic outcomes by the patient's self-assessment survey. METHODS Medical records of patients with keloids, who were treated with postoperative electron beam RT between January 2015 and December 2020, were reviewed. A total of 85 consecutive patients with 136 keloids were included in this study. Subjective cosmetic outcomes were scored by each patient using a 5-point Likert scale survey. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 29.0 months (range, 12.1-77.9 months), and local recurrence was observed in 10 lesions (7.4%). The recurrence rate of keloids occurring in the ear was 5.4%, whereas the recurrence rate of keloids occurring at other body sites was 11.4%. Among the patients who responded to the questionnaire about the cosmetic outcome, 70.2% of patients declared being either very satisfied (44.7%) or satisfied (25.5%). CONCLUSION Surgical excision, followed by CT-based conformal electron beam RT, for patients with keloids ensures a high degree of local control resulting in good cosmetic outcomes.

Background: Spin is defined as the use of specific reporting strategies to highlight the beneficial effect of a treatment despite nonsignificant results. The presence of spin in peer-reviewed literature can negatively impact clinical and research practices. The purpose of this study was to identify the quantity and types of spin present in primary studies and systematic reviews using suture tape augmentation for ankle instability as a model. Methods: This study was conducted per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Each abstract was assessed for the presence of the 15 most common types of spin. Extracted data included study title, authors, publication year, journal, level of evidence, study design, funding, reported adherence to PRISMA guidelines, and PROSPERO registration. Full texts of systematic reviews were used in the assessment of study quality per A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews Version 2 (AMSTAR 2). Results: Nineteen studies were included in the final sample. At least 1 type of spin was identified in each study except one (18 of 19, 94.7%). The most common type of spin observed was type 3 (“selective reporting or overemphasis on efficacy outcomes or analysis favoring the beneficial effect of the experimental intervention”) (6 of 19, 31.6%), The second most reported category of spin was type 4 (“the conclusion claims safety based on non-statistically significant results with a wide confidence interval”) (4 of 19, 21.1%). Among systematic reviews, we identified type 5 (“the conclusion claims the beneficial effect of the experimental treatment despite a high risk of bias in primary studies”) in 4 out of 6 (66.7%) of the articles that were included. No significant associations were found between study characteristics and type of spin. Conclusion: In this exploration of the introduction of a new technology, we identified spin to be highly present in the abstracts of primary studies and systematic reviews concerning suture tape augmentation for ankle instability. Steps should be taken by scientific journals to ensure that spin is minimized in the abstract to accurately reflect the quality of the intervention.