The very young are more prone to lead poisoning than adults, and the treatment with chelating agents, either as monotherapy or combined treatment, is still a matter of dispute. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of three chelating agents administered either as monotherapies or as combined treatments in sucklings. Lead acetate (5 mg Pb kg−1 i.p.) was administered to the 7‐day‐old rat pups in eight litters on experimental day 1 and chelating agents on experimental days 2 and 3. Pups were divided into six groups: (1) untreated control; (2) EDTA (calcium disodium ethylendiaminetetraacetate, 0.3 mmol kg−1 i.p. at 4 p.m.); (3) meso‐DMSA (meso‐2,3‐dimeracaptosuccinic acid, 0.5 mmol kg−1 p.o. at 10 a.m.); (4) rac‐DMSA (racemic‐2,3‐dimeracaptosuccinic acid, 0.5 mmol kg−1 p.o. at 10 a.m.); (5) EDTA+meso‐DMSA; and (6) EDTA+rac‐DMSA. Rats were killed on experimental day 5. Tissue element concentrations were analyzed by atomic absorption spectrometry. Treatment with EDTA did not affect tissue Pb, but it reduced Zn in the carcass and liver. Meso‐DMSA reduced Pb in the kidneys and brain, and it did not affect organ essential elements. Rac‐DMSA most efficiently reduced Pb concentrations in the carcass, kidneys and brain, but it also reduced Zn and Cu in the liver and Zn in the kidneys. Combined treatments with EDTA never improved the efficiency of either DMSA isoform in decreasing tissue Pb but they did reduce tissue Zn concentrations. All treatments caused the same decrease in the carcass Ca concentrations. The results do not support combined treatment in this age group, which is especially sensitive to trace element deficiencies, and suggest that meso‐DMSA might be the treatment of choice in acute lead poisoning in infants. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Ayurvedic metal-mineral tonics are again identified as a potential source of high lead. The import of such tonics should be strictly controlled.

Three meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid mono-N-alkylamides (meso-RNHCOCH(SH)CH(SH)-COOH, where R = CHMe2, Mi-PDMA; CH2CHMe2, Mi-BDMA; and CH2CH2CHMe2, Mi-ADMA), were prepared via a synthetic route using the sulfhydryl-protected anhydride. 2,2-Dimethyl-1,3-dithiolane-4,5-cis-dicarboxylic acid anhydride was opened up with 1 mol of corresponding amine to give the SH-protected monoamide. Subsequent deblocking of the vicinal dithiol functionality was accomplished by conversion of the dithiolane into the mercury complex followed by reaction with H2S to give the target molecule. The potential utility of these compounds in chronic cadmium intoxication was examined by evaluation of their cadmium mobilizing efficacy in vivo in cadmium-loaded female albino rats using sodium N-benzyl-D-glucamine-N-carbodithioate (BGDTC) as the standard drug. Compared to BGDTC, the new compounds were, except at the highest dosage studied, equally or more effective in decreasing retention of hepatic cadmium, while mostly less effective in decreasing renal cadmium. The greatest reductions were obtained with Mi-BDMS at 4 x 1.5 mmol/kg, where liver and kidney cadmium levels were reduced to 12% and 59% of control levels, while at the same dosage BGDTC induced a reduction to 50% and 13% of control levels. The order of the efficacy of the monoamides as hepatic cadmium mobilizing agents was found to be Mi-PDMA > Mi-BDMA > Mi-ADMA. However, the isopropyl analog, though very effective at reducing hepatic cadmium at a low dosage, was found to be more toxic than the isobutyl and isoamyl monoamides. While the new compounds were shown to be effective cadmium mobilizing agents, the specific compounds examined did not possess optimized structures in terms of the balance between effectiveness and toxicity.

No abstract

Racemic dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) was found more efficient than the meso-isoform in enhancing the removal of mercury in rats. However, racemic-DMSA has recently been found more toxic. The efficiency of combined oral treatment with the two isoforms of DMSA for removal of mercury has now been evaluated. Female albino rats were treated orally for four days with meso-(M) and/or racemic-(R) DMSA (1 mmol/kg each), five days after a single intraperitoneal administration of 2"3Hg with 0.5 mg HgC12/kg. The animals were divided into six groups according to the number of treatments with each isomer: control (untreated), 4M, 1R+3M, 2R+2M, 3R+IM, and 4R. Whole body, kidney, liver and brain mercury contents were measured nine days after 203Hg administration. In all treated groups retention in the whole body and kidneys was greatly reduced. The groups treated with racemic-DMSA, regardless of the number of doses, showed a greater removal of mercury than the group treated with meso-DMSA alone (4M). All treatments were less efficient in reducing liver retention, and the brain retention was not affected. It was concluded that even a single application of the more toxic racemic-DMSA during a four-day oral treatment regimen is sufficient to improve the removal by meso-DMSA of mercury from rats.