In this study, to decrease the evaluation uncertainty of the fatigue characteristics of cement-treated aggregate base materials under different test conditions, unconfined compressive, indirect tensile, flexural tensile strength tests and fatigue tests of these base materials with different cement content and at different curing times were carried out. The Weibull distribution was employed to analyze fatigue test results. The standardization model of fatigue characteristics for cement-treated aggregate base materials under different stress states was established. Based on the interval analysis theory, the fatigue characteristic model under different stress states was established using interval parameters. Results revealed that the curing time and cement content considerably affect the strength and fatigue characteristics of cement-treated aggregate base materials, and with increasing cement content and curing time, the fatigue resistance of cement-treated aggregate base materials can be improved. Clear differences between the fitting parameters a and b of the S-N fatigue equation of cement-treated aggregate base materials under different stress states were observed, which can be eliminated by using the analysis method based on the Weibull distribution and the standardization model, and a unified expression for the cement-treated aggregate base materials under different test conditions was realized. A Standardization model of fatigue characteristics based on the interval analysis new method could solve several problems such as inadequate sampling representation, low precision, and insufficient stability of test equipment; thus, the errors caused by materials, structures, the environment, and loads can be reduced, making the fatigue life interval more reasonable and scientific compared to the point numerical fatigue life. Regression parameters a and be were in intervals [9.0, 10.6] and [9.9, 11.3], respectively, and parameters a and b were similar, which improve the test accuracy and reduce the data error.
Modulus testing methods under various test conditions have a large influence on modulus test results, which hinders the accurate evaluation of the stiffness of asphalt mixtures. In order to decrease the uncertainty in the stiffness characteristics of asphalt mixtures under various stress states, the traditional unconfined compression test, direct tensile test, and the synchronous test method, based on the indirect tension and four-point bending tests, were carried out for different loading frequencies. Results showed that modulus test results were highly sensitive to the shape, size, and stress state of the specimen. Additionally, existing modulus characteristics did not reduce these differences. There is a certain correlation between the elastic modulus ratio and the frequency ratio for asphalt under multiple stress states. The modulus, under multiple stress states, was processed using min–max normalization. Then, the standardization model for tensile and compressive characteristics of asphalt under diverse stress states was established based on the sample preparation, modulus ratio variations, and loading frequency ratio. A method for deriving other moduli from one modulus was realized. It is difficult to evaluate the stiffness performance in diverse stress states for asphalt by only using conventional compressive and tensile tests. However, taking into account the effects of stress states and loading frequencies, standardized models can be used to reduce or even eliminate these effects. The model realizes the unification of different modulus test results, and provides a theoretical, methodological, and technical basis for objectively evaluating moduli.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.