This study was conducted to assess the effect of noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and gender on the pharmacokinetics of metformin and to investigate whether or not metformin exhibits dose-dependent pharmacokinetics. The pharmacodynamic effects (on plasma glucose and insulin) of metformin in patients with NIDDM and in healthy subjects also were assessed. Nine patients with NIDDM and 9 healthy subjects received 4 single-blind single-dose treatments of metformin HCL (850 mg, 1,700 mg, 2,550 mg, and placebo) and a multiple-dose treatment of 850 mg metformin HCL (3 times daily for 19 doses). After each single-dose treatment and the final dose of the multiple-dose phase, multiple plasma and urine samples were collected for 48 hours and assayed for metformin levels. Plasma samples were also assayed for glucose and insulin levels. There were no significant differences in metformin kinetics in patients with NIDDM compared with healthy subjects, in men compared with women, or during multiple-dose treatment versus single-dose treatment. Plasma concentrations of metformin increase less than proportionally to dose, most likely due to a decrease in percent absorbed. In patients with NIDDM, single doses of 1,700-mg or higher of metformin significantly decrease postprandial, but not preprandial, glucose concentrations and do not influence insulin concentrations. With multiple doses, both preprandial and postprandial glucose concentrations and preprandial insulin concentrations were significantly lower than with placebo. The effect of metformin on glucose level is correlated with the average fasting plasma glucose level without drug. In healthy subjects, single and multiple doses of metformin showed no effect on plasma glucose, but significantly attenuated the rise in immediate postprandial insulin levels.

The effects of renal impairment and age on the pharmacokinetics of metformin were evaluated. The subjects, including 6 young, 12 elderly, and 3 middle-age healthy adults and 15 adults with various degrees of chronic renal impairment (CRI) each were given a single, 850-mg metformin HCl tablet. Multiple whole blood, plasma, and urine samples were collected and analyzed for metformin levels using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. In healthy elderly individuals, the plasma and whole blood clearance/absolute bioavailability values [CL/F and (CL/F)b], and corresponding renal clearance values (CLR and CLR,b) of metformin were 35-40% lower than the respective values in healthy young individuals. These two groups did not differ significantly with respect to volume of distribution (Vd), time to peak concentration (tmax), and parameters related to metformin's appearance in the urine. In the moderate and severe CRI groups, all clearance values were 74-78% lower than in the healthy young/middle-age group, and all other evaluable pharmacokinetic parameters (with the exception of tmax) differed significantly in this group. In the mild CRI group, clearance values of metformin, which were 23-33% lower than in the young/middle-age group, were the only parameters that differed significantly. Based on a regression analysis of the combined data, both creatinine clearance (CL*cr; corrected for body surface area) and age are predictors of metformin clearance, with the following model best fitting the data: CL/F [or (CL/F)b, CLR, CLR,b] = alpha + beta.CL*cr + gamma.CL*cr.age. Metformin should not be used in patients with moderate and severe CRI, or in patients with mild, but not absolutely stable, renal impairment. The initial and maximum doses in elderly patients and patients with stable mild CRI should be lowered to approximately one third that given to the general (i.e., patients without non-insulin-dependent diabetes) population.

No abstract

BackgroundArtemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) are the mainstay of the current treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria, but ACT resistance is spreading across Southeast Asia. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine is one of the five ACTs currently recommended by the World Health Organization. Previous studies suggest that young children (<5 y) with malaria are under-dosed. This study utilised a population-based pharmacokinetic approach to optimise the antimalarial treatment regimen for piperaquine.Methods and FindingsPublished pharmacokinetic studies on piperaquine were identified through a systematic literature review of articles published between 1 January 1960 and 15 February 2013. Individual plasma piperaquine concentration–time data from 11 clinical studies (8,776 samples from 728 individuals) in adults and children with uncomplicated malaria and healthy volunteers were collated and standardised by the WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network. Data were pooled and analysed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling. Piperaquine pharmacokinetics were described successfully by a three-compartment disposition model with flexible absorption. Body weight influenced clearance and volume parameters significantly, resulting in lower piperaquine exposures in small children (<25 kg) compared to larger children and adults (≥25 kg) after administration of the manufacturers’ currently recommended dose regimens. Simulated median (interquartile range) day 7 plasma concentration was 29.4 (19.3–44.3) ng/ml in small children compared to 38.1 (25.8–56.3) ng/ml in larger children and adults, with the recommended dose regimen. The final model identified a mean (95% confidence interval) increase of 23.7% (15.8%–32.5%) in piperaquine bioavailability between each piperaquine dose occasion. The model also described an enzyme maturation function in very young children, resulting in 50% maturation at 0.575 (0.413–0.711) y of age. An evidence-based optimised dose regimen was constructed that would provide piperaquine exposures across all ages comparable to the exposure currently seen in a typical adult with standard treatment, without exceeding the concentration range observed with the manufacturers’ recommended regimen. Limited data were available in infants and pregnant women with malaria as well as in healthy individuals.ConclusionsThe derived population pharmacokinetic model was used to develop a revised dose regimen of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine that is expected to provide equivalent piperaquine exposures safely in all patients, including in small children with malaria. Use of this dose regimen is expected to prolong the useful therapeutic life of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine by increasing cure rates and thereby slowing resistance development. This work was part of the evidence that informed the World Health Organization technical guidelines development group in the development of the recently published treatment guidelines (2015).

Premarketing dose-ranging studies of a drug are done to establish a reasonable initial dose. According to the current procedure sanctioned by the Food and Drug Administration, each patient is given one of several possible doses, including placebo, after an initial placebo run-in period. Data analysis is based on a model in which the mean response at each dose is independent of the magnitude of the dose. The initial dose is the lowest dose tested that has a response that is statistically significantly greater than the response after placebo administration. We suggest that the present conceptual approach to, and standard study design and analysis for, dose-ranging studies be changed. We believe one must begin with a parametric model for patient-specific dose-response curves. Knowledge of the distribution of these curves in a population provides a basis for choice of an initial dose (e.g., the dose that achieves a given response in a given fraction of patients) and, after observation of response to an initial dose, for choice of an incremental dose for a specific patient (by use of Bayes rule). The current parallel-dose design can provide only poor information about the distribution of dose-response curves, biased estimates of the typical curve, and little information on interpatient variability. Crossover studies provide better information. In studies in which a parametric patient-specific dose-response model is used, a dose-escalation design provides no less information than a crossover design, and it has ethical advantages that allow a more representative patient group and clinical setting to be studied.