Thermooxidative degradation at and beyond processing temperatures has been carried out on polyoxymethylene (POM) enhanced with four different types of POSS, being Glycidyl, GlycidylIsobutyl, Aminopropylisobutyl, and Poly(ethylene glycol). The quantification of such degradation was carried out through FTIR spectrography, color spectrophotometry, and thermogravimetric analysis methods. The results showed that the presence of POSS in the blend improves dramatically the thermal stability of the POM matrix. The best performance was found with Aminopropylisobutyl, whereby the onset of degradation temperature increased by more than 50°C. Said improvement is referred to the conditions where the nanocomposite developed only 2% of carbonyl yield and 8% of yellowing of the 100% deterioration suffered by the standard POM copolymer.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

No abstract

Thermo oxidative degradation at and beyond processing temperatures has been carried out on ABS copolymer grafted with Maleic Anhydride (ABS‐g‐Ma) and three nanocomposites with the above material melt‐blended with different types of POSS, being amino‐propyl isobutyl (APOSS), glycidyl (GPOSS), and trisilanol (TPOSS). The incorporation adequacy of the nanofillers into the matrix has been assessed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), whereas the quantification of the thermal degradation behavior of each sample was carried out through infrared spectrography (FTIR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) including the degradation kinetics and color spectrophotometry (Cielab). Although the results show adequate incorporation and miscibility of the nanofillers into the matrix, the GPOSS and the TPOSS nanocomposites provided no relevant improvements in thermal stability when compared with the base ABS‐g‐Ma, and the APOSS blend exhibits a very slight decay in almost all the quantitative analysis carried out in this work. POLYM. COMPOS., 2012. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers