Landfill leachates are repeatedly found contaminated with organic pollutants, such as alkylphenols (APs), phthalates and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) at levels exceeding water quality standards. It has been shown that these pollutants may be present in the colloidal and truly dissolved phase in contaminated water, making particle separation an inefficient removal method. The aim of this study was to investigate sorption and degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs), selected APs, bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates and PAHs from landfill leachate using sand, granulated activated carbon (GAC) and peat moss filters. A pilot plant was installed at an inactive landfill with mixed industrial and household waste and samples were collected before and after each filter during two years. Leachate pre-treated in oil separator and sedimentation pond failed to meet water quality standards in most samples and little improvement was seen after the sand filter. These techniques are based on particle removal, whereas the analysed pollutants are found, to varying degrees, bound to colloids or dissolved. However, even highly hydrophobic compounds expected to be particle-bound, such as the PHCs and high-molecular weight PAHs, were poorly removed in the sand filter. The APs and BPA were completely removed by the GAC filter, while mass balance calculations indicate that 50-80% of the investigated phenols were removed in the peat filter. Results suggest possible AP degradation in peat filters. No evidence of phthalate degradation in the landfill, pond or the filters was found. The PHCs were completely removed in 50% and 35% of the measured occasions in the GAC and peat filters, respectively. The opposite trend was seen for removal of PAHs in GAC (50%) and peat (63%). Oxygenated PAHs with high toxicity were found in the leachates but not in the pond sediment. These compounds are likely formed in the pond water, which is alarming because sedimentation ponds are commonly used treatment techniques. The oxy-PAHs were effectively removed in the GAC, and especially the peat filter. It was hypothesized that dissolved compounds would adsorb equally well to the peat and GAC filters. This was not completely supported as the GAC filter was in general more efficient than peat.
Physical and chemical adsorption by aged biological active carbon (BAC) filters were observed for some organic matter fractions, and may represent important removal mechanisms during periods of low microbial activity.
A study was conducted
at a water treatment plant to optimize parallel
rapid gravity biofilters for dissolved organic matter (DOM) removal.
The biofilters treat urban and agriculturally impacted river water
using a commercial non-adsorptive, expanded-clay filter medium. The
study aimed to locate the optimal operating conditions via experimental
manipulation of the biofilter empty bed contact time (EBCT) during
full-scale operation at the plant. During a two-month experiment,
contact times in four parallel biofilters were switched to and maintained
at 15, 30, 50, and 80 min by manipulating the hydraulic loading on
each filter. The removal efficiency of organic matter fractions increased
with EBCT for dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and microbial humic-like
(F290/420) and protein-like (F280/340) fluorescent
organic matter. Other DOM fractions were largely unaffected by biofiltration,
or at slightly higher concentrations in the effluent. Protein-like
fluorescence is associated with labile organic matter fractions, which
are known to be removed poorly by drinking water treatment barriers
apart from biological filters. The results suggest that long contact
times (>30 min) have advantages for the operation of some biological
filters, especially if placed ahead of barriers that are sensitive
to biofouling, e.g., membranes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.