The mechanical properties of cells influence their cellular and subcellular functions, including cell adhesion, migration, polarization, and differentiation, as well as organelle organization and trafficking inside the cytoplasm. Yet reported values of cell stiffness and viscosity vary substantially, which suggests differences in how the results of different methods are obtained or analyzed by different groups. To address this issue and illustrate the complementarity of certain approaches, here we present, analyze, and critically compare measurements obtained by means of some of the most widely used methods for cell mechanics: atomic force microscopy, magnetic twisting cytometry, particle-tracking microrheology, parallel-plate rheometry, cell monolayer rheology, and optical stretching. These measurements highlight how elastic and viscous moduli of MCF-7 breast cancer cells can vary 1,000-fold and 100-fold, respectively. We discuss the sources of these variations, including the level of applied mechanical stress, the rate of deformation, the geometry of the probe, the location probed in the cell, and the extracellular microenvironment.

Here we investigated the question whether cells, being highly heterogeneous objects, could be described with the elastic modulus (effective Young's modulus) in a self-consistent way. We performed a comparative analysis of the elastic modulus derived from the indentation data obtained with atomic force microscopy (AFM) on human cervical epithelial cells (both normal and cancerous). Both sharp (cone) and dull (2500-nm radius sphere) AFM probes were used. The indentation data were processed through different elastic models. The cell was approximated as a homogeneous elastic medium that had either 1), smooth hemispherical boundary (Hertz/Sneddon models) or 2), the boundary covered with a layer of glycocalyx and membrane protrusions ("brush" models). Consistency of these approximations was investigated. Specifically, we tested the independence of the elastic modulus of the indentation depth, which is assumed in these models. We demonstrated that only one model showed consistency in treating cells as a homogeneous elastic medium, namely, the brush model, when processing the indentation data collected with the dull AFM probe. The elastic modulus demonstrated strong depth dependence in all models: Hertz/Sneddon models (no brush taken into account), and when the brush model was applied to the data collected with sharp conical probes. We conclude that it is possible to describe the elastic properties of the cell body by means of an effective elastic modulus, used in a self-consistent way, when using the brush model to analyze data collected with a dull AFM probe. The nature of these results is discussed.

No abstract

When measuring the elastic (Young's) modulus of cells using AFM, good attachment of cells to a substrate is paramount. However, many cells cannot be firmly attached to many substrates. A loosely attached cell is more compliant under indenting. It may result in artificially low elastic modulus when analyzed with the elasticity models assuming firm attachment. Here we suggest an AFM-based method/model that can be applied to extract the correct Young's modulus of cells loosely attached to a substrate. The method is verified by using primary breast epithelial cancer cells (MCF-7) at passage 4. At this passage, approximately one-half of cells develop enough adhesion with the substrate to be firmly attached to the substrate. These cells look well spread. The other one-half of cells do not develop sufficient adhesion, and are loosely attached to the substrate. These cells look spherical. When processing the AFM indentation data, a straightforward use of the Hertz model results in a substantial difference of the Young's modulus between these two types of cells. If we use the model presented here, we see no statistical difference between the values of the Young's modulus of both poorly attached (round) and firmly attached (close to flat) cells. In addition, the presented model allows obtaining parameters of the brush surrounding the cells. The cellular brush observed is also statistically identical for both types of cells. The method described here can be applied to study mechanics of many other types of cells loosely attached to substrates, e.g., blood cells, some stem cells, cancerous cells, etc.

A new approach to bioelectronic Sense-and-Act systems was developed with the use of modified electrodes performing sensing and substance-releasing functions. The sensing electrode was activated by biomolecular/biological signals ranging from small biomolecules to proteins and bacterial cells. The activated sensing electrode generated reductive potential and current, which stimulated dissolution of an Fe(3+)-cross-linked alginate matrix on the second connected electrode resulting in the release of loaded biochemical species with different functionalities. Drug-mimicking species, antibacterial drugs, and enzymes activating a biofuel cell were released and tested for various biomedical and biotechnological applications. The studied systems offer great versatility for future applications in controlled drug release and personalized medicine. Their future applications in implantable devices with autonomous operation are proposed.