No abstract

No abstract

SummaryPrevious studies have demonstrated that the psychological contract is largely shaped during socialization. This study adopts a complementary perspective and analyzes how the psychological contract at the start of employment shapes the subsequent socialization process. Drawing upon social exchange theory, we propose that newcomers with a higher sense of their personal obligations at entry will perceive orientation training as more useful and develop better relationships with their supervisors and peers, which in turn will facilitate their work adjustment. Results of a longitudinal survey on a sample of 144 recruits from a European Army show that newcomers with a higher initial sense of their employee obligations toward their employer report higher perceived training utility, higher leader-member exchange (LMX) with their instructors, and higher team-member exchange (TMX) with their platoon peers. Moreover, perceived training utility and LMX predict the fulfillment of employers' obligations; and training utility predicts the level of newcomers' employee obligations. Finally, training utility, LMX, and TMX predict some of three indicators of newcomers' adjustment, namely, role clarity (training utility and LMX), group integration (TMX), and organizational values understanding (training utility). These results highlight how newcomers' obligations at the start of employment contribute to the social exchange dynamic underlying organizational socialization. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords: organizational socialization; psychological contract; leader-member exchange; team-member exchange; trainingThe first few months in a new organizational environment constitutes a critical period both for the employer and for the newcomer (De Vos & Freese, 2011;Thomas & Anderson, 1998). Through socialization processes, the newcomer learns the ropes of his or her new role and becomes an effective member of the organization. In particular, this period is considered to be crucial in shaping and stabilizing the psychological contract, defined as the individual's perception of the reciprocal obligations which underlie the exchange relationship between the employee and the employer (Rousseau, 1990). To date, research on the psychological contract during the socialization process has mainly documented the newcomer's unfavorable reactions to the employer's failure to fulfill perceived obligations (Dulac, Coyle-Shapiro, Henderson, & Wayne, 2008;Lapointe, Vandenberghe, & Boudrias, 2013;Robinson, Kraatz, & Rousseau, 1994;Tekleab, Orvis, & Taylor, 2013).Researchers have also analyzed how psychological contracts develop during socialization either as a result of active information-seeking behaviors and knowledge acquisition by the newcomer or in response to perceived employer inducements and employee contributions (De Vos, Buyens, & Schalk, 2003;De Vos & Freese, 2011;Thomas & Anderson, 1998 Research ArticleInstead of considering the psychological contract as a result of the socialization process, Payne, Culbertson, Boswell,...

Most studies dedicated to the examination of employer branding in industrial/organisational psychology investigated it using samples of applicants. The objective of the present research was to study the influence of the employer branding of a company on its employees' attitudes. More precisely, we examined the interactive effect of the employment offering as portrayed by organisational communications and the employment experience as lived by employees on their affective commitment (AC). Furthermore, we analysed the mechanisms underlying these relationships, i.e. perceived organisational support (POS) and psychological contract violation (PCV). One-hundred eighty-six department managers of a large multinational retailing company involved in employer branding practices were surveyed. Results indicated that employment offering and lived employment experience interact in the prediction of both POS and PCV and this interactive effect carries over to AC. Implications of these findings for both researchers and practitioners are discussed.

Aujourd’hui largement diffusée, la gestion des compétences continue à faire face à trois questions fondamentales. D’abord, celle de la pertinence de son instrumentation : les outils de gestion des compétences restent critiqués pour leur réductionnisme, leur rapide obsolescence et leur manque de fiabilité. Ensuite, celle de son désajustement organisationnel : les pratiques de gestion des compétences semblent souvent faire abstraction des spécificités des contextes organisationnels dans lesquels elles émergent. Enfin, celle de son articulation stratégique : comment comprendre et gérer le lien entre les pratiques de gestion des compétences centrées sur l’individu et un pilotage stratégique de l’entreprise fondé sur ses compétences-clés ? En réponse à ces questions, cette contribution vise à mettre en évidence des configurations cohérentes d’instruments, de contextes organisationnels et de finalités stratégiques susceptibles de sous-tendre les dispositifs de gestion des compétences. L’analyse repose sur sept études de cas menées dans des entreprises contrastées, publiques ou privées et de tailles diverses.L’analyse comparative des cas fait émerger quatre modèles distincts de gestion des compétences : 1- un modèle de la normalisation centré sur des comportements partagés à large échelle et visant l’homogénéisation culturelle; 2- un modèle de la polyvalence permettant l’allocation flexible des ressources humaines au sein d’un périmètre d’activité; 3- un modèle du talent individuel faisant des qualités et aptitudes personnelles génériques la clé de la performance individuelle et collective; 4- et, enfin, un modèle de l’expertise centré sur la maîtrise de compétences techniques complexes et la livraison de prestations à haute valeur ajoutée. Cette modélisation permet de resituer les pratiques de gestion des compétences dans leur contexte organisationnel. Elle clarifie la valeur ajoutée qu’un système de gestion des compétences peut apporter à la réalisation d’une stratégie d’entreprise. Enfin, les choix opérationnels faits dans la construction des référentiels de compétences peuvent être compris et réfléchis à la lumière du modèle retenu.It is widely accepted that competency-based management continues to face three acute issues. The first concerns the relevance of its toolkit: competency-based management tools continue to be criticized for their reductionism, rapid obsolescence and lack of reliability. The second issue concerns its organizational maladjustment: competency-based management practices often seem to ignore the specificities of the contexts from which they emerge. Finally, the third issue pertains to its strategic articulation: how to understand and manage the link between competency-based management practices that are centred on the individual and the strategic management of the company based on its core competences? In responding to these issues, this paper aims to highlight the mechanisms, organizational contexts and strategic objectives that are likely to underpin competency-based management practices. The...