Protein acetylation is an important contributor to cancer initiation. Histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) controls JAK2 translation and protein stability and has been implicated in JAK2-driven diseases best exemplified by myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). By using novel classes of highly selective HDAC inhibitors and genetically deficient mouse models, we discovered that HDAC11 rather than HDAC6 is necessary for the proliferation and survival of oncogenic JAK2-driven MPN cells and patient samples. Notably, HDAC11 is variably expressed in primitive stem cells and is expressed largely upon lineage commitment. Although Hdac11is dispensable for normal homeostatic hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell differentiation based on chimeric bone marrow reconstitution, Hdac11 deficiency significantly reduced the abnormal megakaryocyte population, improved splenic architecture, reduced fibrosis, and increased survival in the MPLW515L-MPN mouse model during primary and secondary transplantation. Therefore, inhibitors of HDAC11 are an attractive therapy for treating patients with MPN. Although JAK2 inhibitor therapy provides substantial clinical benefit in MPN patients, the identification of alternative therapeutic targets is needed to reverse MPN pathogenesis and control malignant hematopoiesis. This study establishes HDAC11 as a unique type of target molecule that has therapeutic potential in MPN.

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm hallmarked by the upregulation of the Janus kinase (JAK)—signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway with associated extramedullary hematopoiesis and a high burden of disease-related symptoms. While JAK inhibitor therapy is central to the management of MF, it is not without limitations. In an effort to improve treatment for MF patients, there have been significant efforts to identify combination strategies that build upon the substantial benefits of JAK inhibition. Early efforts to combine agents with additive therapeutic profiles have given way to rationally designed combinations hoping to demonstrate clinical synergism and modify the underlying disease. In this article, we review the preclinical basis and existing clinical data for JAK inhibitor combination strategies while highlighting emerging strategies of particular interest.

Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are JAK2-driven disorders resulting from mutations in JAK2, MPL, or CALR. Ruxolitinib, the only FDA-approved JAK2 inhibitor for MPNs, alleviates patient symptomology and improves quality of life, but has little effect on reducing mutant allele burden. This persistent survival of MPN cells in the face of ruxolitinib, as well as other JAK2 inhibitors that have been clinically tested, is a major clinical bottleneck to the development of an effective targeted therapy for MPN patients. Identifying new therapeutic targets which play critical roles in MPN cells and/or in JAK2 inhibitor persistence may lead to improved MPN therapies. SHP2 is an oncogenic tyrosine phosphatase that is an effector of growth factor and cytokine receptor signaling. SHP2 plays a critical role in the activation of the RAS-ERK pathway and regulates JAK-STAT signaling via numerous phosphatase-dependent mechanisms. Activating mutations of SHP2(PTPN11) have been identified in leukemia, including 8% of MPN patients whose disease progressed to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In addition, SHP2 has been shown to mediate adaptive resistance to targeted therapies in several cancers. Given the role of SHP2 in cytokine and JAK-STAT signaling, we envisaged a potential role of SHP2 in MPN cell growth and/or survival and ruxolitinib persistence. Treatment of JAK2-V617F-driven MPN model cell lines (UKE1, SET2, and BaF3-JAK2-V617F) with ruxolitinib blocked constitutive tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP2, including phosphorylation of Y542, a marker for activated SHP2. This phosphorylation, however, was restored in ruxolitinib persistent cells. Combination treatment of the allosteric SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4550 (Revolution Medicines) with ruxolitinib prevented the development of ruxolitinib persistent cells and pre-established persistent cells remained sensitive to SHP2 inhibition. RMC-4550 treatment led to significantly reduced levels of pERK consistent with the role of SHP2 in RAS signaling. Interestingly, pERK levels in persistent cells were more sensitive to SHP2 inhibition compared to drug naïve cells suggesting pERK was more dependent on SHP2 in ruxolitinib persistent cells. SHP2 inhibitor treatment increased pSTAT5(Y694) in drug naïve cells but this increase was not observed in similarly treated persistent cells. Furthermore, while ruxolitinib inhibited pERK levels in UKE1 and SET2 cells, pERK levels recovered within 24 hrs of treatment. SHP2 inhibition prevented the recovery of pERK in the presence of ruxolitinib. Collectively, these data suggest that signaling pathways in MPN cells treated with ruxolitinib can become rewired, gaining greater dependence on SHP2, concomitant with sustained pERK and cell survival/growth. Interestingly, we identified a known activating SHP2 mutation (F71L) in UKE1 cells obtained from two independent sources - consistent with the presence of PTPN11 mutations in post-MPN AML. The persistent survival of UKE1 cells in ruxolitinib was antagonized by CRISPR-mediated reduction of SHP2 expression, providing further evidence that SHP2 contributes to ruxolitinib persistence. To assess the effects of a SHP2 inhibitor on MPN progression in vivo, we employed the MPLW515Lbone marrow transplant mouse model of MPN. Initial assessment of therapeutic treatment of mice with an established MPN phenotype indicated that once daily treatment of RMC-4550 (10 or 30 mg/kg) antagonized the MPN phenotype. Complete blood counts indicated a significant reduction in white blood cells, monocytes, and neutrophils compared to vehicle treated mice, while flow cytometry analysis indicated RMC-4550 diminished CD11b+ cell numbers to near that observed in mice transplanted with MPLWT-transduced bone marrow. RMC-4550 improved the overall health of diseased mice, as indicated by increased weight, and significantly reduced organomegaly of the spleen and liver compared to vehicle treated MPN mice. Finally, erythropoietin independent erythroid colony formation of JAK2V617F-positive MPN patient cells was suppressed following SHP2 inhibition, which synergized or enhanced the inhibition induced by ruxolitinib in this assay. In summary, our results suggest that SHP2 inhibition may represent a potential MPN therapy in both ruxolitinib naïve and resistant patients and is an attractive therapeutic target for future clinical investigation. Disclosures Epling-Burnette: Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Reuther:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding.

Mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) is a rare group of acute leukemias with blasts that co-express antigens of more than one lineage or separate populations of blasts of different lineages. Though treatment guidelines are not well established, the standard of care in treating MPAL remains the acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)-derived chemotherapeutic regimen of hyper-cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin (also known by its trade name, Adriamycin), and dexamethasone (CVAD) followed by allogeneic stem-cell transplant (ASCT). Beyond induction chemotherapy, evidence-based treatments remain to be investigated, especially regarding patients who relapse prior to ASCT. This case report illustrates a patient with relapsed MPAL following induction hyper-CVAD who was not immediately eligible for ASCT. After brief treatment with gilteritinib alone, the patient was started on gilteritinib and azacitidine as salvage therapy and achieved and maintained complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi) for eight months. Targeted therapy is a novel approach to improve survival rate, but unfortunately, there have been very few studies in the context of MPAL. We report a patient with relapsed FLT3-mutant MPAL who achieved remission using a combination approach with targeted therapy.

Introduction: Acetylated histone and non-histone proteins are pharmacologic targets for both solid and hematological cancers including myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), a group of clonal hematological malignancies driven by aberrant JAK2/STAT signaling. MPNs are characterized by epigenetic alterations, including aberrant acetylation, which makes this disease particularly interesting for targeting with HDAC inhibitors. Four classes of histone deacetylases (Class I-IV HDACs) regulate gene transcription and modulate cellular processes that drive the initiation and progression of cancer. Pan-HDAC and class I-selective HDAC inhibitors have gained traction in clinical settings, yet we reasoned that specific targeting of the 18 distinct HDAC proteins may establish roles for select HDACs as therapeutic vulnerabilities in MPNs. Methods: To explore the roles of individual HDACs in MPN, we first conducted an inhibitor screen of compounds having distinct HDAC selectivity based on electrophoretic mobility shift assays with full-length human HDAC proteins expressed in baculovirus and unique peptide substrates. Ultra-specific HDAC6 compounds were initially targeted for analysis based on its previously defined role in HSP90-mediated JAK2 stabilization and translation. Survival of MPN cell line models, MPN patient samples, leukemia cell lines, and MPN disease progression in mice transplanted with Hdac6-/-, and Hdac11-/- hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) transduced with the MPLW515L oncogene, as well as Tg-Hdac11-eGfp mice were used to show the role of HDAC6 and HDAC11 in oncogene-driven and homeostatic hematopoiesis. As further proof of specificity, HDAC6 and HDAC11 were genetically ablated in MPN model cell lines using either RNA interference or inducible shRNA. For HDAC11 substrate identification, a combination of RNA-seq, acetylated proteome (SILAC), global metabolomics (LC-MS), Seahorse metabolic assays (Agilent Technologies), enzymatic assays, and acetylation-specific immunoblotting and mutation profiling were performed (Fig. 1). Results: Despite the established interplay between HDAC6, HSP90 and JAK2, neither a highly selective HDAC6 inhibitor, HDAC6 silencing, nor the Hdac6 deficiency suppressed MPN pathogenesis, although there were clear effects on the acetylation of α-tubulin, a well characterized HDAC6-selective substrate. Intriguingly, both inhibition of HDAC11 activity with highly-specific HDAC11 inhibitors and silencing HDAC11 using an inducible validated shRNA, identified HDAC11 as a therapeutic vulnerability for multiple human MPN cell lines. The Tg-Hdac11-eGFP reporter mice showed that HDAC11 is expressed in several hematopoietic cell types, including myeloid cells, erythroblasts, and megakaryocytes. Thus, Hdac11-/- and Hdac11+/+MPLWT bone marrow were examined for steady-state hematopoiesis and transplantation chimerism. These studies demonstrated that HDAC11 does not contribute to homeostatic or transplantated bone marrow reconstitution. However, in the oncogenic MPL model, recipient mice transplanted withoncogenic MPLW515L-expressing Hdac11-deficient HSCs displayed markedly impaired cytokine-independent colony-formation, had less fibrosis, and displayed improved survival in primary and secondary MPN hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; thus HDAC11 contributes to MPN pathogenesis (Fig. 1). Studies in additional leukemia cell lines, including THP-1, HL-60, and mantle lymphoma cell lines, but not in Ramos or K562 cells, established that HDAC11 contributes to oncogene-driven events in other cell types. Mechanistically, RNA-seq, SILAC proteomics, and metabolic profiling revealed that HDAC11 controls aerobic glycolysis by deacetylating Lys343 of the glycolytic enzyme enolase-1 (ENO1), functionally inactivating ENO1. Finally, the effects of targeting HDAC11 on metabolism were augmented by blocking compensatory pathways of oxidative phosphorylation that are induced via JAK2V617Fand MPLW515L oncogenic signaling. Conclusions: Our comprehensive screens of HDAC inhibitors, coupled with our biological, in vivo and molecular studies, indicate that HDAC11 is an attractive and potent target for disabling MPN metabolism and pathogenesis. These finding support the rationale for further development of clinical HDAC11 inhibitors for the treatment of metabolically-active cancers such as MPNs. Disclosures Pinilla Ibarz: Teva: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Reuther:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Levine:Loxo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Lilly: Honoraria; C4 Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Isoplexis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Imago Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Qiagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prelude Therapeutics: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Verma:BMS: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Stelexis: Equity Ownership, Honoraria; Acceleron: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Epling-Burnette:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding.