To examine the differential sensitivity of the ovary to temporary withdrawal of gonadotropin support at different stages of folliculogenesis and corpus luteum function, GnRH antagonist blockade of gonadotropin secretion was examined in 17 studies using the Nal-Glu GnRH antagonist. A vehicle control, antagonist treatment, and follow-up cycle format was used in each study. A previously determined ED100 dose of the Nal-Glu GnRH antagonist (150 micrograms/kg) or vehicle was administered sc every 24 h for 3 consecutive days in the midfollicular phase (MFP), late follicular phase (LFP), and midluteal phase (MLP). In studies in the MFP (n = 7), the largest follicle was 11 +/- 2 mm (mean +/- SEM), and the mean estradiol (E2) level was 220 +/- 44 pmol/L on the first day of antagonist administration. Administration of the antagonist resulted in a 75 +/- 6% suppression of LH (P less than 0.005), no significant change in FSH, and suppression of E2 to the assay detection limit (P less than 0.05). Total cycle length was increased compared to that of the vehicle control cycle (37.3 +/- 1.3 vs. 26.3 +/- 1.1 days; (P less than 0.005) due to prolongation of follicular phase length (P less than 0.005) and reinitiation of folliculogenesis. In the LFP (n = 5), the largest follicle was 16 +/- 1 mm (P less than 0.05 vs. MFP), and the E2 level was 394 +/- 95 pmol/L (P less than 0.05 vs. MFP) on the first day of antagonist administration. Antagonist administration resulted in a 65 +/- 6% suppression of LH (P less than 0.05), a 47 +/- 11% decrease in FSH (P less than 0.05), and no significant change in E2. Total cycle length was prolonged (32.4 +/- 2.2 vs. 25.6 +/- 0.4 days; P less than 0.05) due to an increase in follicular phase length (P less than 0.02); however, the prolongation of the follicular phase was significantly less than that of the MFP (8.0 +/- 1.5 vs. 15.1 +/- 0.1 days; P less than 0.001), suggesting ovulation from the initial dominant follicle. In studies in the MLP (n = 5), LH, E2, and progesterone decreased to the assay detection limit after antagonist administration, while FSH decreased by 36 +/- 4% (P less than 0.05). Menstrual bleeding occurred within 24-48 h of the final Nal-Glu antagonist injection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
The purpose of this study is to determine the role of bleeding, acute thermal damage, and charring in adhesion formation. Postoperative adhesions were compared following ovarian wedge resection in 48 rabbits using different lasers, electrosurgery, and scalpel. Twelve ovaries were sectioned per modality, in randomized pairs. Acute thermal injury as assessed by histology, bleeding, and charring differed among the modalities used. Adhesions were assessed 4 weeks later, by an investigator completely blinded of the treatment protocol. The adhesion scores were 11.6 +/- 8.0 with pulsed Er:YAG laser; 11.9 +/- 7.5 with scalpel; 8.3 +/- 9.3 with electrocautery; 6.7 +/- 8.8 with a continuous (c.w.) Nd:YAG laser; 5.3 +/- 4.8 with c.w. CO2 laser; 3.1 +/- 2.7 with pulsed CO2 laser; 1.7 +/- 1.8 with pulsed Ho:YAG laser; and 0.8 +/- 1.5 in the control (no resection) group. Ho:YAG, Nd:YAG, and electrocautery were completely hemostatic. Bleeding was minimal with the CO2 lasers. Er:YAG and scalpel caused maximum bleeding, requiring hemostatic measures to prevent exsanguination. Charring occurred with electrocautery, CO2 laser, and Nd:YAG laser. Bleeding and charring correlated with adhesion formation, but the histological depth of thermal damage did not. The Ho:YAG laser is a hemostatic, fiber-optic compatible laser causing significantly fewer adhesions (P < 0.04) than scalpel, electrocautery, Nd:YAG, Er:YAG, and c.w. CO2 lasers. Clinical use of the Ho:YAG laser, and the role of carbonization in promoting adhesions, deserve further study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.