Introduction:Fractures of the proximal femur and hip are relatively common injuries in adults and common source of morbidity and mortality among the elderly. Many methods have been recommended for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.Material and methods:We retrospective analyzed all the patients with fractures of the hip treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) at the Clinic of Orthopedic and Traumatology, University Clinical Centre Tuzla from the first of January 2012 to 31 December 2012 years. The study included 63 patients averaged 73.6±11.9 years (range, 29 to 88 years). Fracture type was classified as intertrochanteric (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen classification 31.A.1, A.2 and A.3) and subtrochanteric fractures (Seinsheimer classification).Results and discussion:The ratio between the genders female-male was 1.6:1. There was statistically significant difference prevalence of female compared to male patients (p=0.012). There were 31 left and 32 right hip fractured. Low energy trauma was the cause of fractures in 57(90.5%) patients. Averaged waiting time for hospitalization was 3.2±7.5 days (range, 0 to 32 days). 44 patients were admitted the same day upon injuring. The average waiting time for the treatment was 3.6±5.7 days. The ratio between with or without co-existent disease was 4.7:1. During the three months postoperatively with ASA score 3 and 4 six patients died. There were no significant differences in deaths from ASA score 1 and 2 (p=0.52). Reoperation for the treatment of implant or fracture-related complications was required in three (4.7%) patients (infection, reimplantation and extraction). Three patient developed deep vein thrombosis. Statistically significant difference was found in the deaths in the first three months compared to the next three months (p=0.02). We found statistically significant difference between pre-injury and postoperative mobility score (p=0.0001).Conclusion:PFNA is an excellent device for osteosynthesis as it can be easily inserted. Moreover, it provides stable fixation, which allows early full weightbearing mobilization of the patient.

a ssessment of depth of anesthesia is the basis in anesthesiologist ' s work because the occurrence of awareness during general anesthesia is important due to stress, which is caused in the patient at that moment, and due to complications that may arise later. There are subjective and objective methods used to estimate the depth of anesthesia. The aim of this study was to assess the depth of anesthesia based on clinical parameters and on the basis bispectral index, and determine the part of bispectral monitoring in support to clinical assessment. Material and methods: Sixty patients divided into two groups were analyzed in a prospective study. In first group (group 1), the depth of anesthesia was assessed by PRST score, and in the second group (group 2) was assessed by bispectral monitoring with determination PRST score concurrently. In both groups PRST score was assessed in four periods, while bispectral monitoring is used continuously. For analysis were used the BIS index values from the equivalent periods as PRST scores. PRST score value 0-3, and BIS index 40-60 were considered as adequate depth of anesthesia. The results showed that in our study were not waking patients during the surgery. In the group where the depth of anesthesia assessed clinically, we had a few of respondents (13%) for whom at some point were present indicators of light anesthesia. Postoperative interview excluded the possibility of intraoperative awareness. In the second group of patients and objective and clinical assessment indicated at all times to adequate depth of anesthesia. Conclusion: The use of BIS monitoring with clinical assessment allows anesthesiologists precise decision-making in balancing and dosage of anesthetics and other drugs, as well as treatment in certain situations.

Introduction:Fracture of the femoral shaft is a common fracture encountered in orthopedic practice. In the 1939, Küntscher introduced the concept of intramedullary nailing for stabilization of long bone fractures. Intramedullary nailing has revolutionized the treatment of fractures.Material and methods:The study included 37 male patients and 13 female patients, averaged 39±20,5 years (range, 16 to 76 years).Results and discussion:There were 31 left femurs and 21 right femurs fractured. 46 fractures were the result of blunt trauma. Low energy trauma was the cause of fractures in six patients, of which five in elderly females. 49 fractures were closed. Healing time given in weeks was 19,36 ± 6,1. The overall healing rate was 93,6%. There were three (6,25%) major complications nonunion. There were one (2%) delayed union, one (2%) rotational malunion and no infection. The shortening of 1 cm were in two patients. Antercurvatum of 10 degrees was found in one patient. There was no statistically significant reduction of a motion in the hip and knee (p<0.05). There was statistically significant in the thigh (knee extensors) muscle weakness (p<0.001).Conclusion:Intramedullary nailing is the treatment of choice for femoral shaft fractures.

supracondylar fracture,