ObjectiveTo investigate treatment choices and outcomes in women with ovarian cancer, comparing elderly (≥75 years) and younger patients (<75 years).MethodsA single-center retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer between 2010 and 2015. The initial treatment plan and course of treatment were extracted from medical files.ResultsOf 128 included patients, 34% were aged ≥75 years. The initial treatment plan consisted of the combination of cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (ie, standard treatment) in only 10% of the elderly patients with an indication for this treatment. 5% of these patients completed this treatment without adaptations (compared with 85% and 48%, respectively, in younger patients). 38% of the elderly patients with an indication for cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy received best supportive care only. Patient preference was an important reason to withhold standard treatment. Surgery- and chemotherapy-related complications and hospital admissions did not differ between groups. Median survival was lower in the elderly (p=0.002) and in patients receiving best supportive care (p<0.001).ConclusionsElderly patients were less frequently treated in accordance with the treatment guideline. To select those older patients who may benefit from (adapted) treatment is challenging. Future studies should evaluate determinants associated with treatment completion to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Objective: To assess the association between loss of lumbar skeletal muscle mass and density during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and postoperative complications after interval cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in older patients with ovarian cancer. Materials and methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients aged 70 years and older with primary advanced stage ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III-IV), treated with NACT and interval CRS. Skeletal muscle mass and density were retrospectively assessed using Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI) and Muscle Attenuation (MA) on routinely made Computed Tomography scans before and after NACT. Loss of skeletal muscle mass or density was defined as >2% decrease per 100 days in SMI or MA during NACT. Results: In total, 111 patients were included. Loss of skeletal muscle density during NACT was associated with developing any postoperative complication 30 days after interval CRS both in univariable (Odds Ratio (OR) 3.69; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.57e8.68) and in multivariable analysis adjusted for functional impairment and WHO performance status (OR 3.62; 95%CI 1.27e10.25). Loss of skeletal muscle density was also associated with infectious complications (OR 3.67; 95%CI 1.42e9.52) and unintended discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 5.07; 95%CI 1.41e18.19). Unlike loss of skeletal muscle density, loss of skeletal muscle mass showed no association with postoperative outcomes. Conclusion: In older patients with ovarian cancer, loss of skeletal muscle density during NACT is associated with worse postoperative outcomes. These results could add to perioperative risk assessment, guiding the decision to undergo surgery or the need for perioperative interventions.

Low preoperative skeletal muscle density measured on an abdominal CT scan is associated with worse postoperative outcomes.• Preoperative low skeletal muscle mass is associated with infectious complications, but not with other outcomes.• Preoperative low skeletal muscle density is of added value to functional impairment in predicting surgical complications.• Low skeletal muscle quality and functional impairment can be seen as markers for sarcopenia.

Background: Approximately 40% of the newly diagnosed patients with advanced ovarian cancer are aged 70 years or older. Standard treatment for advanced disease consists of cytoreductive surgery and combination chemotherapy. In older patients, standard treatment is often withheld or prematurely stopped due to suspected frailty. It remains challenging to distinguish fit elderly patients who can endure standard therapy from frail patients who may benefit from an adapted treatment strategy. As a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can contribute to the identification of frail patients and improve tailored therapy in this population, screening tests were developed to select those who may benefit from a CGA. However, the use of these geriatric screening tests has rarely been compared with usual clinical care. The GERSOC-trial will evaluate whether geriatric screening in elderly patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer improves treatment completion and quality of life. Methods: This pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial will be conducted at a minimum of 20 hospitals in the Netherlands. Hospitals are randomly assigned to geriatric screening care (in which a geriatric screening comprised of the G8 questionnaire and the Timed Up and Go test is performed), or care as usual (in which current usual care is continued). A total of 320 patients aged ≥ 70 years with primary, advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma will be included. Patients considered fit on geriatric screening will receive standard treatment; patients who are considered unfit will be referred to a geriatrician for analysis and treatment advice. The primary outcome is the percentage difference in completed standard and adapted therapies between the two study arms. Secondary outcomes include quality of life, cost-effectiveness and survival. Discussion: This trial aims to gather evidence for the use of geriatric screening in treatment decision-making in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer. If proven feasible, beneficial and cost-effective, geriatric screening may be implemented in routine clinical practice.