Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation (HCT) is frequently considered for patients (pts) with relapsed T-cell lymphoma (TCL) and less often as consolidation of initial therapy. Outcomes from prior registry data show that only 31% of pts remain disease free 3 years after HCT (Smith et al. JCO 2013). However, several single institution studies have superior outcomes. We previously presented an analysis of allogeneic transplant in T-cell lymphoma but have expanded this effort to 12 academic centers with longer follow up (Mehta-Shah ASH 2017). Methods: We analyzed the patient characteristics at time of diagnosis and transplant, treatment history, overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in consecutive TCL pts who had an HCT from 1/1/2000-12/31/2019 at 12 academic institutions. Results: Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. 508 pts were identified with median age 51 years (16 - 72). 452 (86.5%) had known remission status at the time of HCT: 245 (54.4%) complete remission (CR), 168 (37.2%) partial remission (PR), 23 (5.0%) stable disease (SD), 16 (3.2%) progressive disease (PD). Seventy-eight (15.5%) had a prior autologous HCT. Thirty-six (7%) pts underwent HCT in CR1, 352 (69%) for relapsed/refractory TCL, and was not specified in 120 pts (24%). The median HCT comorbidity index (HCT-CI) score was 1 (0-11). Conditioning regimens were myeloablative (n=180), reduced intensity/non-myeloablative (n=323), unknown (n=3). Donor type was known for 471 pts: 192 matched related (MRD), 183 matched unrelated (MUD), 53 mismatched (MMD), 18 haploidentical donors, 25 umbilical cord blood. In this series, the 2 year OS and PFS rate following HCT were 59.1% (95%CI: 54.6-63.3%) and 45.8% (95%CI: 41.3-50.2%) respectively. 5 year OS and PFS rate were 50.8% (95%CI: 46.1-55.3%) and 39.4% (95%CI: 34.9-43.9%) (Fig 1) For disease specific 2-year and 5-year PFS, see Table 1. At a median follow-up of 29.7 mo (0.1-263 mo), 163 pts had relapsed and 261 pts had died. The median time from relapse post HCT to death was 10.2 mo (0-158.4 mo). Of 261 deaths: 81 were due to transplant related mortality (TRM), 69 were confirmed to be from TCL, and 111 were from non-relapse mortality/unknown. There was not a significant difference in PFS for pts with AITL, PTCL-NOS, ALK positive ALCL or ALK negative ALCL, with median PFS of 23.2 mo (95%CI:15.3-64.2). However, when AITL was compared specifically to PTCL-NOS or ALCL, those with AITL had a trend towards improved median PFS (51.4 mo vs. 18.4 mo, p=0.14) and improved median OS (not reached vs. 73.1 mo, p=0.26). At 5 years, PFS was worse for CTCL (18.6%, 95% CI: 9.7%-30.0%) compared to PTCL subtypes (43.8%; 95% CI: 37.3%-50.0%)(p<0.001) . However, 5-year OS was similar for CTCL (44.0%, 95% CI: 30.1-56.4%) and PTCL (53.1%, 95% CI: 46.5-59.3%) (p=0.46). The rate of TRM at 1 year was 11.2% (95%CI:8.5%-14.0%). Of evaluable pts, 245/489 (46%) had acute GvHD and 192/473 (40.6%) had chronic GvHD. There were no differences in TRM according to recipient age (p=0.47). Higher HCT-CI was associated with an increased risk of TRM (HR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.031-1.286; p=0.012) Disease status at the time of HCT was associated with PFS (p<0.001). Median PFS for those with CR (n=239), PR (n=164), SD (n=22) or PD (n=14) were 44.6 mo, 8.6 mo, 21 mo, 3.5 mo respectively. Degree of donor match was associated with cumulative TRM (p=0.0241). For pts who underwent MRD, MUD, or MMD HCT, cumulative TRM at 12 months was 8% (95%CI: 5.5-12.2%), 13.1% (95%CI: 9.7-17.8%), 14.7% (95%CI: 8.7-24.6%). Conclusions: We present the largest series of HCT in TCL. In this dataset, HCT provided durable disease control for a significant portion of pts with relapsed or refractory or otherwise high risk TCL. Depth of response to therapy immediate prior to HCT was associated with PFS. Patients with AITL appeared to have a trend towards improved outcome with HCT compared to other common PTCL histologies. Patients with CTCL had a higher rate of relapse compared to PTCL subtypes, but OS was similar. MRD HCTs were associated with lower TRM. This data supports the curative potential of HCT in a patient group with otherwise poor survival and limited treatment options. Disclosures Mehta-Shah: Corvus: Research Funding; Genetech/Roche: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Dahi:Kite: Consultancy. Sauter:Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite - a Gilead Company: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharamaceuticals: Consultancy; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Moskowitz:Merck: Research Funding; Imbrium Therapeutics, L.P.: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Miragen Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Jacobsen:Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy. William:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Dova: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria. Barta:Monsanto: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Atara: Honoraria. Allen:Clinical Care Options: Speakers Bureau; Curio Sciences: Honoraria; Research to Practice: Speakers Bureau; Imbrium: Consultancy, Other; Bayer: Consultancy, Other. Song:Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen, Celgene,Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria. Ruan:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding. McKinney:Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead, Seattle Genetics, Molecular Templates, BTG, Pharmacyclics, Verastem, Genentech, Inc., Celgene: Consultancy; UNUM, Molecular Templates, Incyte, Beigene, Denovo Biopharma, Pharmacyclics, Nordic Nanovector, BMS, Genentech, Inc., Celgene: Research Funding. Beaven:Tessa Therapeutics: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; MorphoSysAb: Research Funding; LoxoOncology: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Haverkos:Viracta THerapeutics: Consultancy. Alpdogan:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Kiowa Kirin: Consultancy. Porcu:Kiowa Kirin: Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Galderma: Research Funding; Daiichi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Cell Medica: Research Funding; Miragen: Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy; Viracta Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Horwitz:Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Myeloid Therapeutics: Consultancy; Miragen: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aileron: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity/Verastem: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Corvus: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vividion Therapeutics: Consultancy; Affirmed: Consultancy; ASTEX: Consultancy.
Introduction: CFT7455 is a highly potent and novel Ikaros Family Zinc Finger Protein 1/3 (IKZF1/3) degrader. In xenograft models, CFT7455 has more potent IKZF1/3 degradation compared to other degraders. Early observations from the FIH clinical trial (NCT04756726) along with supporting translational studies are presented here. Methods: Pre-clinical studies comparing CFT7455 and CC-92480 in both in vitro and xenograft models were performed. The pre-clinical studies’ results coincided with observations from the on-going clinical trial. The clinical trial is an open-label, Phase 1/2, multi-center, FIH study in heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) patients evaluating safety, tolerability, and PK of CFT7455. Eligible MM patients are R/R to therapy and are not candidates for regimens known to provide clinical benefit. A starting dose of 50 μg QD 21 days on/7 days off (21/7) in 28-day cycles was administered. Results: CFT7455 and CC-92480 showed similar cereblon binding profiles and in vitro IKZF1/3 degradation kinetics, translating into sub-nanomolar GI50 values in proliferation assays across a panel of MM cell lines. In the NCI-H929 xenograft model, 100 μg/kg/day of CFT7455 resulted in durable tumor regressions, while 1000 μg/kg/day of CC-92480 gave tumor stasis. Similar results were seen in a systemic model of MM, MM1.S. Both compounds achieved >95% IKZF3 degradation in tumors 4h post dose. At 48h post dose, CFT7455 was more effective than CC-92480 in maintaining IKZF3 degradation (65% vs. 6% respectively). When levels of CFT7455 and CC-92480 in plasma and tumor were compared, CFT7455 concentrations were > DC80 in tumor 48h post dose, while CC-92480 levels were undetectable in tumor and plasma, demonstrating CFT7455 has longer exposure resulting in sustained IKZF1/3 degradation in pre-clinical models. In cohort A, 5 heavily pre-treated MM patients (pts) received single agent CFT7455. 4 pts have received at least 3 cycles, with 2 pts receiving 5 cycles. Neutropenia (grade 4) was observed in 3/5 pts without coincident fever or infection. Additionally, a 2-4 fold accumulation in plasma CFT7455 exposure at steady state was observed. Early pharmacodynamic (PD) data demonstrates deep persistent degradation of IKZF3 (~100%) and serum free light chain reduction (up to 72%) in response to treatment. Stable disease has been observed in 34 pts, suggesting clinical benefit. Conclusions: While CFT7455 showed clinical benefit at 50 ug with deep target degradation, neutropenia was dose limiting. PK/PD modeling suggests alternative dosing regimens may result in increased tolerability with preserved efficacy, and evaluation of them is underway. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Sagar Lonial, Shambavi Richard, Jeffrey V Matous, Andrew J. Yee, Urvi Shah, Neha Mehta-Shah, Thomas Martin, Eli Muchtar, Sikander Ailawadhi, Paul G. Richardson, Manisha Bhutani, Samantha Perino, Jason Kirby, Roman V. Agafonov, Prasoon Chaturvedi, Bradley Class, Matthew Schnaderbeck, Michael R. Palmer, Cathleen Gorman, Oliver Schoenborn-Kellenberger, Amanda Hoerres, Stewart L. Fisher, Roy M. Pollock, Adam Crystal, Michelle Mahler, Jesus Bardeja. Pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of a novel IKZF1/3 degrader, CFT7455, enables significant potency advantage over other IKZF1/3 degraders in models of multiple myeloma (MM) and the results of the initial treatment cohort from a first-in-human (FIH) phase 1/2 study of CFT7455 in MM [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT186.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.