The Portuguese version of FACT-F is a reliable and valid instrument to assess quality of life and fatigue, representing a valid tool to screen cancer-related fatigue in Brazilian cancer patients.
Phantom pain and phantom sensations are highly prevalent among cancer patients. Further studies should be carried out to determine the main factors associated with their onset.
Em pacientes com câncer em tratamento adjuvante a fadiga é altamente prevalente e é um sintoma debilitante e crônico. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar, na literatura científica, a prevalência e curso da fadiga em pacientes com câncer de mama em tratamento adjuvante. A revisão da literatura foi realizada a partir da base de dados online Pubmed, para o período entre janeiro de 1996 e setembro de 2004, utilizando os seguintes descritores: fatigue e breast cancer. O total de artigos obtidos por meio dessa busca foi de 108. Foram identificados 14 artigos que atendiam aos critérios de inclusão para este estudo. A fadiga ocorreu entre 1% e 94% dos pacientes com câncer, e foi medida por meio de instrumentos específicos em nove estudos. A fadiga aumentou durante a radioterapia, permaneceu com um platô e retornou ao nível pré-tratamento meses após o seu término. Durante a quimioterapia observou-se que houve aumento da sua prevalência e severidade e que ela é maior durante os primeiros dias após a quimioterapia em relação ao período entre os ciclos. Muitos dos estudos revelaram que a fadiga está significativamente associada a vários fatores físicos, biológicos e comportamentais sendo que quando relacionada ao câncer ela é multidimensional. Devem ser realizadas mais pesquisas controladas, principalmente em mulheres brasileiras com câncer de mama. Estas pesquisas devem avaliar grupos mais homogêneos e com instrumentos válidos e confiáveis para melhor conhecimento da fadiga nesta população e propiciar melhora da qualidade de vida das pacientes.
Background: It has been 10 years since a population-based mammography screening was implemented in Japan. Publicly funded mammography and breast examination are performed every two years on women who are over 40 years old. It is important that the subjects understand the benefits of breast cancer screening in terms of a reduced mortality from breast cancer; however, they must also be aware of the potential disadvantages, such as false-positive diagnoses and over diagnosis. It is unclear how well the Japanese people understand the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening. This study assessed the opinions of participants in Akita, Japan, asking them about the benefits and harms attributable to breast cancer screening. Their answers were compared with those given by a group of registered nurses, who had been asked the same questions. Methods: This study was carried out from August to December 2014 in Akita, Japan. A questionnaire survey, including questions on the expected benefits and harms of breast cancer screening was devised and given to women undergoing screening mammography and breast examination. The same survey was given to nurses working in eight hospitals in the Akita Kouseiren Hospital group. Results: The questionnaire survey was given to 1649 participants aged 29–96 years and 1905 registered nurses (including 89 men) aged 20–69 years. All the members of the first group experienced breast cancer screening, but 42% of the registered nurses had no screening experience. The questionnaire was returned by 1552 people (94.1%) and 1710 people (89.8%), respectively. There were many misunderstandings found in the answers to the questions. The common misconceptions were as follows: screening prevents or reduces the risk of development of breast cancer (86% of participants, 62% of registered nurses); screening reduces the mortality from breast cancer by more than 50% (69% of participants, 60% of registered nurses); and 10 years of regular screening for 50-year-old women will prevent 10 or more breast cancer deaths per 1000 women (62% of participants, 61% of registered nurses). However, there were some correct answers; approximately half of the people studied (46% of participants, 57% of registered nurses) knew that detecting a cancer early by screening did not always reduce mortality or lengthen life. Conclusion: In Japan, most people overestimated the benefit that can be expected from breast cancer screening and the number of women who would benefit was not well understood. These misunderstandings were seen in the group of registered nurses as well as in the participants. So far, breast cancer screening has been publicized with only positive messages, for example, "the earlier the better" and "the smaller the better." Henceforth, screening should be publicized with more balanced messages, including figures for how many women will benefit and how many will be harmed. Individuals should then be able to use that information to make an informed choice about whether or not to undergo breast cancer screening. Citation Format: Shimada T, Takahashi M, Tsukisawa K, Shimizu Y, Tanaka M, Saito N, Takahashi K, Ishikawa N, Hashimoto M, Kinouchi K, Fujiwara M, Sato T. Knowledge of the potential benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: A survey of participants and nurses. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-02-10.
AgradecimentosA Deus, por me dar a certeza de que sempre existe um caminho. À Profª Drª Sophie Françoise Mauricette Derchain, a quem tenho como exemplo de amor à profissão e à arte de ensinar. Minha admiração e meus agradecimentos pelas orientações relevantes e disposição em me receber e ajudar ao longo deste estudo. Ao Prof Dr Luiz Cláudio Santos Thuler, a quem tenho grande admiração por sua integridade pessoal, capacidade de trabalho, meus especiais agradecimentos pela sua valiosa orientação e ensinamentos no decorrer desses anos no INCA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.