BackgroundHigh-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is an alternative to conventional normobaric oxygen therapy (NBO) for hypoxemic patients. Since nothing is known about its effect on carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning, we hypothesized that HFNC might be a useful device in the treatment of CO poisoning victims.Material/MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who were admitted consecutively to the emergency department with CO intoxication. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients treated with HFNC and patients treated with conventional face mask (CFM). Demographic data, pretreatment, and control (after 1 hour) arterial blood gas analyses values of the patients were evaluated.ResultsSixty-eight patients (mean age 35.8±18.7 years) were included in this study. NBO was given via HFNC to 38 patients (55.9%), and via CFM to 30 patients (44.1%). The demographic characteristics and pretreatment values of carboxy-hemoglobin (COHb) were similar in the 2 groups. The mean COHb value of the HFNC group at the first hour was found significantly lower than the CFM group: 9.5±4.7 and 12.0±5.1, respectively (P=0.041). Improvement of COHb level was significantly higher in the HFNC group compared to the CFM group: 12.5±4.5 versus 6.7±3.7, respectively (P=0.001).ConclusionsHFNC was superior than CFM in alleviating COHb levels in the victims of CO poisoning. We believe that using HFNC will increase patient comfort by shortening the duration of treatment in emergency department settings, especially in patients who have mild clinical findings of CO poisoning.

No abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the propertiesof burn injured patients who admitted to our hospitalemergency service.Methods: Patients were detected from the hospital recordsof emergency service during six months period andwere divided into five groups according to their ages (<10,11-20, 21-40, 41-60 and >60 years). Age, gender totalbody surface area (TBSA), mechanism of injury and theoutcome of emergency evaluation were recorded.Results: Totally 111619 patients admitted to our emergencyservice between 01.07.2011 and 31.12.2011. Duringsix months, 2349 males and 1960 females totally4309 patients were burn injured patients. 1773 patientswere between 0-10 years, 1083 patients were 11-20years, 735 patients were between 21 and 40, 361 patientswere between 41 and 60 and 357 patients were over 60years. Most of the patients were treated in the emergencyservice (90.1%). 0-10% TBSA patients constituted 94.2%.This ratio for burn area >40% was 0.6%. Hot liquid burn(vapored water, milk etc.) was 60.2%. There was a significantrelation between mechanism of burn injury andage groups (p<0.05). No corrosive and sunburn injuriesdetermined in females. Age groups were related with hospitalization(p<0.05). The highest intensive care unit admissionwas found in the 0-10 age group (1.3%).Conclusion: Emergency service is the first admission departmentof burn injury patients. Knowing the propertiesof burn injury patients, would help hard-working emergencydoctors in triage of these patients. Also, reportingthe data of emergency service burn injury patients wouldbe helpful for further studies. J Clin Exp Invest 2013; 4(3): 285-288Key words: Burn injury, emergency service, total body surface are

No abstract

No abstract