To determine the prevalence and purpose of complementary alternative medicines (CAMs) use in people receiving treatment for HIV infection. To identify and quantify potential health risks of CAM use in this population and to explore options for improved pharmacovigilance. MethodsCross-sectional questionnaire survey of 293 patients receiving antiretroviral (ARV) therapy at three specialist HIV out-patient clinics in central London, UK. The use of herbal medicines and supplements was explored, and potentially adverse side effects or significant drug interactions with conventional therapies were identified. ResultsOf the 293 patients included, 61% (n 5 179) were taking herbal remedies or supplements and 35% (n 5 103) were using physical treatments. Twenty-seven per cent (n 5 80) used a combination of both. Twenty per cent (n 5 59) potentially compromised their HIV management through using CAM therapy. Ten per cent (n 5 29) were advised to stop their CAMs and 15% (n 5 43) were made aware of potential drug interactions and adverse effects and were advised to monitor their care. ConclusionsThere are potentially significant health risks posed by the concomitant use of CAMs in patients taking ARV therapy. Medical practitioners need to be able to identify CAM use in HIV-positive patients and recognize potential health risks. Patients should be encouraged to disclose CAM use to their clinicians and other healthcare professionals.
Early diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) leads to a decreased morbidity and mortality. General practice offers an important window for earlier diagnosis. The British HIV Association produced guidelines in 2008 advocating an increase in HIV testing, with specific references to primary care. This study explores the awareness of, and opinions towards, these guidelines within general practice. An email questionnaire was sent to 191 general practitioners nationwide, in both areas of high and low HIV prevalence. A total of 80 doctors replied, giving a response rate of 42%. In all, 44% of the respondents were unaware of the guidelines and 89% felt comfortable discussing and carrying out an HIV test themselves; of the 11% that did not, all but one were from low prevalence areas (P = 0.037). Respondents felt that main barrier to HIV testing was patient acceptability. Having read the guidelines, 70% believed it would be feasible to follow them in practice. Those who disagreed felt that time implications were the most important reason not to adopt the guidelines. Almost half the respondents were not aware of the guidelines; having read them, the majority felt that implementation is feasible. This demonstrates the necessity for better dissemination of these guidelines. This study found that the main barrier to performing an HIV test was felt to be patient acceptance, a contradiction to findings from recent pilot studies.
The prompt and effective treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) may reduce the risk of complications such as infertility, ectopic pregnancy and pelvic pain. We conducted a national audit to investigate the treatment of women diagnosed with PID and associated rates of partner notification in genitourinary (GU) medicine clinics during 2008 and compared our results with the British Association of Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) 2005 national guideline. Among a total of 1,105,587 female attendees, national data showed 18,421 cases of PID diagnosed in GU medicine clinics, giving an incidence of 167 cases per 10,000 attendences. We audited a national sample of 1132 PID cases for review. Of those, 504 (44.5%) received a recommended treatment regimen and 447 (39%) of named male contacts were treated. Adherence to recommended treatment and partner notification did not reach national standards.
Demand for genitourinary (GU) medicine services is outstripping supply. Improving efficiency can modulate the supply side of the equation, e.g. decreasing the number of clients having to return for their results. This survey explored how clients at two central London GU medicine clinics would like to receive their results and their views were reflected against what was offered by London GU medicine clinics. There was a significant difference between the result delivery services that the clients wanted and what the clinics provided (P <0.0001, chi(2)). Of the clients, 92% wanted to know their results regardless of outcome whereas 22% of London clinics would only inform clients of positive results. This study questions the importance and feasibility of patient choice, an important aspect of the National Strategy for Sexual Health and HIV. Clinics may not individually be able to provide choice but between them, they do provide a wide range of alternatives for the client.
We conducted a survey of patients attending two GUM clinics to evaluate the use of the internet for seeking sexual partners and for seeking on-line sexual health information. Prevalence of internet sex-seeking (ISS) was 11% (57/500) in Plymouth and 21% (50/237) in London. ISS was more common among men who have sex with men (MSM) (43/92 = 47%) than men who have sex with women (MSW) (38/280 = 14%, P< 0.0001) and more common amongst MSW than women who have sex with men (WSM) (25/350 = 7%, P = 0.007). In both samples, accessing sexual health information online was associated with ISS (Plymouth, P = 0.05 and London, P = 0.001), as was reporting more than 10 sexual partners per year (Plymouth and London, P < 0.001). It remains to be seen whether the potential sexual health promotion benefits of the internet could balance potential risks of STI acquisition.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.