Profex is a graphical user interface for the Rietveld refinement program BGMN. Its interface focuses on preserving BGMN's powerful and flexible scripting features by giving direct access to BGMN input files. Very efficient workflows for single or batch refinements are achieved by managing refinement control files and structure files, by providing dialogues and shortcuts for many operations, by performing operations in the background, and by providing import filters for CIF and XML crystal structure files. Refinement results can be easily exported for further processing. State-of-the-art graphical export of diffraction patterns to pixel and vector graphics formats allows the creation of publication-quality graphs with minimum effort. Profex reads and converts a variety of proprietary raw data formats and is thus largely instrument independent. Profex and BGMN are available under an open-source license for Windows, Linux and OS X operating systems.

No abstract

No abstract

Defining the most adequate architecture of a bone substitute scaffold is a topic that has received much attention over the last 40 years. However, contradictory results exist on the effect of grain size and microporosity. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of these two factors on the in vivo behaviour of β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) scaffolds. For that purpose, β-TCP scaffolds were produced with roughly the same macropore size (≈ 150 μm), and porosity (≈ 80 %), but two levels of microporosity (low: 10 % / high: ≈ 25 %) and grain size (small: 1.3 μm /large: ≈ 3.3 μm). The sample architecture was characterised extensively using materialography, Hg porosimetry, micro-computed tomography (μCT), and nitrogen adsorption. The scaffolds were implanted for 2, 4 and 8 weeks in a cylindrical 5-wall cancellous bone defect in sheep. The histological, histomorphometrical and μCT analysis of the samples revealed that all four scaffold types were almost completely resorbed within 8 weeks and replaced by new bone. Despite the three-fold difference in microporosity and grain size, very few biological differences were observed. The only significant effect at p < 0.01 was a slightly faster resorption rate and soft tissue formation between 4 and 8 weeks of implantation when microporosity was increased. Past and present results suggest that the biological response of this particular defect is not very sensitive towards physico-chemical differences of resorbable bone graft substitutes. As bone formed not only in the macropores but also in the micropores, a closer study at the microscopic and localised effects is necessary.