Molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir were the first available oral antivirals (OAs) active against SARS-CoV-2. Trials evaluating the efficacy of OAs involved patients unvaccinated and infected with variants different from those currently circulating. We conducted a retrospective study on patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection treated with OAs during the omicron surge in Italy in order to provide real-life data on the efficacy and safety of OAs during the omicron surge of the COVID-19 pandemic. Among 257 patients, 56.8% received molnupiravir, while 43.2% received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Patients in the molnupiravir group were older, had a lower body mass index, and had a higher rate of chronic heart disease than those treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Three hospitalizations were recorded in the molnupiravir (2.1%) group and one in the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (0.9%) group. One patient treated with molnupiravir died. The median time to negativity was 8 days in the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir group vs. 10 days in the molnupiravir group, p < 0.01. We recorded 37 ADRs (mainly dysgeusia, diarrhea, and nausea) in 31 individuals (12.1%). Only two patients (0.8%) treated with molnupiravir terminated treatment due to ADRs. In conclusion, in a population of mostly vaccinated patients treated with OAs, we observed a low rate of hospitalization, death, and adverse drug reactions. These rates were lower than those reported in pivotal trials.

Objective: to describe a single-center experience of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) in non-HIV patients recovering from COVID-19. Methods: We report the cases of five non-HIV patients with COVID-19 who also developed PJP at a University Hospital. Results: With the exception of one subject, who experienced an atypical and prolonged course of COVID-19, all the patients developed PJP after the clinical resolution of COVID-19 pneumonia. All but one patient had no pre-existing immunosuppressive conditions or other risk factors for PJP development at COVID-19 diagnosis. Nonetheless, following the course of COVID-19 infection, all the patients fulfilled at least one host factor for PJP; indeed, all the patients had received at least 2 weeks of high-dose steroids and three out of five had a CD4+ cell count <200/mm3. Conclusions: The use of corticosteroids for COVID-19 respiratory impairment seems to be the most common risk factor for PJP, together with viral-induced and iatrogenic lymphopenia. The worsening in respiratory function and the characteristic radiological picture during or after COVID-19 pneumonia should raise the suspicion of PJP, even in immunocompetent patients. PJP primary chemoprophylaxis can be considered in selected high-risk COVID-19 patients, but further studies are needed.

Background: Advances in the development of Direct-Acting Antivirals (DAAs), particularly pangenotypic drugs, have led to a high rate of hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication. Notably, real- world studies have confirmed the efficacy and safety of pangenotypic DAA combinations reported in registration trials. The aim of this study was to review the treatment recommendations, and the efficacy and safety data of anti-HCV pangenotypic drugs reported in registration clinical trials and in recent real-life cohort studies. Methods: We reviewed the efficacy and safety data of pangenotypic anti-HCV drug combinations reported in original articles and in online conference abstracts. Results: Current pangenotypic drug combinations resulted in very high rates of sustained virologic response and few adverse reactions in real-life settings. SVR12 rates in real-life studies ranged from 90-100% depending on the pangenotypic combination, the HCV genotype and the stage of liver disease. Most adverse reactions reported in real-life settings were mild in intensity and rarely led to treatment discontinuation. These results are in accordance with those of clinical trials. Conclusion: Pangenotypic DAAs result in very high rates of sustained virologic responses and are well tolerated. However, they are contraindicated in patients with decompensated cirrhosis or advanced chronic kidney disease who failed previous DDA-based treatment. Further research is required to customize treatment to “unpackage” current DAA combinations and to develop generic drugs against HCV.

KL-6 is a sialoglycoprotein antigen which proved elevated in the serum of patients with different interstitial lung diseases, especially in those with a poorer outcome. Given that interstitial pneumonia is the most common presentation of SARS-CoV2 infection, we evaluated the prognostic role of KL-6 in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were prospectively enrolled. Blood samples were collected at the time of enrolment (TOE) and on day 7 (T1). Serum KL-6 concentrations were measured by chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay using a KL-6 antibody kit (LUMIPULSE G1200, Fujirebio) and the cut-off value was set at > 1000 U/mL. Fifteen out of 34 enrolled patients (44.1%) died. Patients with unfavourable outcome showed significantly lower P/F ratio and higher IL-6 values and plasmatic concentrations of KL-6 at TOE compared with those who survived (median KL-6: 1188 U/mL vs. 260 U/mL, p < 0.001). KL-6 > 1000 U/mL resulted independently associated with death (aOR: 11.29, p < 0.05) with a positive predictive value of 83.3%. Our results suggest that KL-6 is a reliable indicator of pulmonary function and unfavourable outcome in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. A KL-6 value > 1000 U/mL resulted independently associated with death and showed good accuracy in predicting a poorer outcome. KL-6 may thus represent a quick, inexpensive, and sensitive parameter to stratify the risk of severe respiratory failure and death.

Since early 2020, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVIDAU : PleasenotethatCOVID À 19hasbeendefine-19) pandemic has caused hundreds of millions of cases and several million deaths worldwide [1]. The development of effective vaccination has substantially changed the course of the pandemic, and the introduction of mass vaccination policies in most high-and middle-income countries has drastically reduced the number of new cases, hospitalizations, and deaths. However, vaccination is not the only tool able to provide immune prophylaxis against COVID-19. Herein, we discuss the use of monoclonal antibodies in addition to vaccination in order to better protect vulnerable people, particularly those with immunosuppression.