Author contributions D.J.M. is IS☉IS Principal Investigator (PI) and led the data analysis and writing of the study. E.R.C. is IS☉IS Deputy PI, helped develop EPI-Hi, and participated in the data analysis. C.M.S.C. helped develop EPI-Hi and participated in the data analysis. A.C.C. helped develop EPI-Hi and participated in the data analysis. A.J.D. helped develop EPI-Hi and participated in the data analysis. M.I.D. participated in the data analysis. J.G. participated in the data analysis. M.E.H. helped develop EPI-Lo and participated in the data analysis. C.J.J. produced Figs. 3, 4 and participated in the data analysis. S.M.K. participated in the data analysis. A.W.L. helped develop EPI-Hi and participated in the data analysis. R.A.L. helped develop EPI-Hi and participated in the data analysis. O.M. participated in the data analysis. W.H.M. participated in the data analysis. R.L.M. led the development of EPI-Lo and participated in the data analysis. R.A.M. helped develop EPI-Hi and participated in the data analysis. D.G.M. helped develop EPI-Lo and participated in the data analysis. A.P. participated in the data analysis. J.S.R. helped develop EPI-Hi and participated in the data analysis. E.C.R. participated in the data analysis. N.A.S. led the development of the IS☉IS Science Operations Center and participated in the data analysis. E.C.S. helped develop EPI-Hi and participated in the data analysis. J.R.S. led the development of the analysis tool, produced Figs. 1, 2, and participated in the data analysis. M.E.W. led the development of EPI-Hi and participated in the data analysis. S.D.B. is FIELDS PI and participated in the data analysis. J.C.K. is SWEAP PI and participated in the data analysis. A.W.C. helped develop SWEAP and participated in the data analysis. K.E.K. helped develop SWEAP and participated in the data analysis. R.J.M. helped develop FIELDS and participated in the data analysis. M.P. helped develop FIELDS and participated in the data analysis. M.L.S. helped develop SWEAP and participated in the data analysis. A.P.R. led the CME simulation work and participated in the data analysis.

We present Heliospheric Current Sheet (HCS) and Plasma Sheet (HPS) observations during Parker Solar Probe's (PSP) first orbit around the Sun. We focus on the eight intervals that display a true sector boundary (TSB; based on suprathermal electron pitch angle distributions) with one or several associated current sheets. The analysis shows that (1) the main density enhancements in the vicinity of the TSB and HCS are typically associated with electron strahl dropouts, implying magnetic disconnection from the Sun, (2) the density enhancements are just about twice that in the surrounding regions, suggesting mixing of plasmas from each side of the HCS, (3) the velocity changes at the main boundaries are either correlated or anticorrelated with magnetic field changes, consistent with magnetic reconnection, (4) there often exists a layer of disconnected magnetic field just outside the high-density regions, in agreement with a reconnected topology, (5) while a few cases consist of short-lived density and velocity changes, compatible with short-duration reconnection exhausts, most events are much longer and show the presence of flux ropes interleaved with higher-β regions. These findings are consistent with the transient release of density blobs and flux ropes through sequential magnetic reconnection at the tip of the helmet streamer. The data also demonstrate that, at least during PSP's first orbit, the only structure that may be defined as the HPS is the density structure that results from magnetic reconnection, and its by-products, likely released near the tip of the helmet streamer. * There is a correlation or anti-correlation at most observed boundaries. In a few cases more complex velocity trends are seen, generally in association with flux rope-type structures.

During its first solar encounter, the Parker Solar Probe (PSP ) acquired unprecedented up-close imaging of a small Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) propagating in the forming slow solar wind. The CME originated as a cavity imaged in extreme ultraviolet that moved very slowly (< 50 km/s) to the 3-5 solar radii (R ) where it then accelerated to supersonic speeds. We present a new model of an erupting Flux Rope (FR) that computes the forces acting on its expansion with a computation of its internal magnetic field in three dimensions. The latter is accomplished by solving the Grad-Shafranov equation inside two-dimensional cross sections of the FR. We use this model to interpret the kinematic evolution and morphology of the CME imaged by PSP. We investigate the relative role of toroidal forces, momentum coupling, and buoyancy for different assumptions on the initial properties of the CME. The best agreement between the dynamic evolution of the observed and simulated FR is obtained by modeling the two-phase eruption process as the result of two episodes of poloidal flux injection. Each episode, possibly induced by magnetic reconnection, boosted the toroidal forces accelerating the FR out of the corona. We also find that the drag induced by the accelerating solar wind could account for about half of the acceleration experienced by the FR. We use the model to interpret the presence of a small dark cavity, clearly imaged by PSP deep inside the CME, as a low-density region dominated by its strong axial magnetic fields.