1015 Background: Atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) plus nab-paclitaxel was shown to improve outcomes in mTBNC in a phase III clinical trial. Subjects were required to be > 12 months from curative-intent therapy in this trial. It remains unknown whether non-taxane chemo + anti-PD-1/L1 will be beneficial in mTNBC, or whether this approach is effective in rapidly-progressing patients ( < 12 mo from curative-intent therapy). Methods: mTNBC patients were enrolled in a phase Ib study of anti-PD-1 (pembro, 200mg IV q3w) plus physician’s choice chemo (cape: n = 14, 2000mg BID, 7d on/7d off; or taxol: n = 14, 80mg/m2 q1w). Primary/secondary objectives were to evaluate safety/tolerability (primary) and RECIST1.1 response (w12). The exploratory objective was to explore for differences in immunomodulation according to chemo choice. Mixed effects models were employed to compare the longitudinal effects of chemo on peripheral immune cells (flow cytometry) and T-cell diversity (Immunoseq assay). Results: Enrollment of the trial is complete (n = 28), with 100% of evaluable patients tolerating therapy (n = 22) as of 2/1/2019. Cape ORR was 43% (5 PR, 1 CR, 2 SD) with median PFS = 155d. Taxol ORR was 25% (1 CR, 1 PR, 3 SD) with median PFS = 99d. Subjects enrolled < 12 months from curative-intent therapy had numerically lower response (ORR = 27%, 1 CR, 2 PR, 3 SD) than subjects without rapid progression (ORR = 45%, 1 CR, 4 PR, 2 SD). No significant differences in immunomodulation were observed according to chemo type, however both cape & taxol were associated with declines in T-cell quantity (CD4 p < .02, CD8 p < .04) and Immunoseq T-cell fraction over time. Conclusions: Pembro plus cape or taxol is safe with encouraging efficacy, however activity may be lower in the setting of rapid progression following curative-intent chemo. Cape+pembro efficacy is favorable with no measurable differences in immunomodulation, and therefore cape may be preferred as a chemo backbone in selected patients. Both cape and taxol are associated with iatrogenic declines in T-cell quantity, which may explain the observed dropoff in anti-PD-1/L1 activity in later lines. Clinical trial information: NCT02734290.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of preoperative locoregional cytokine therapy (IRX-2 regimen) in early-stage breast cancer, and to evaluate for intratumoral and peripheral immunomodulatory activity.Patients and Methods: Sixteen patients with stage I-III earlystage breast cancer (any histology type) indicated for surgical lumpectomy or mastectomy were enrolled to receive preoperative locoregional immunotherapy with the IRX-2 cytokine biological (2 mL subcutaneous  10 days to periareolar skin). The regimen also included single-dose cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m 2 ) on day 1 to deplete T-regulatory cells and oral indomethacin to modulate suppressive myeloid subpopulations. The primary objective was to evaluate feasibility (i.e., receipt of therapy without surgical delays or grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events). The secondary objective was to evaluate changes in stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte score. The exploratory objective was to identify candidate pharmacodynamic changes for future study using a variety of assays, including flow cytometry, RNA and T-cell receptor DNA sequencing, and multispectral immunofluorescence.Results: Preoperative locoregional cytokine administration was feasible in 100% (n ¼ 16/16) of subjects and associated with increases in stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (P < 0.001). Programmed death ligand 1 (CD274) was upregulated at the RNA (P < 0.01) and protein level [by Ventana PD-L1 (SP142) and immunofluorescence]. Other immunomodulatory effects included upregulation of RNA signatures of T-cell activation and recruitment and cyclophosphamide-related peripheral T-regulatory cell depletion.Conclusions: IRX-2 is safe in early-stage breast cancer. Potentially favorable immunomodulatory changes were observed, supporting further study of IRX-2 in early-stage breast cancer and other malignancies.

No abstract

TPS1106 Background: ICB (atezolizumab, anti-PD-L1) is known to improve survival when added to chemo, however only in PD-L1-positive, triple-negative MBC. ICB is less effective in hormone receptor positive (HR+) MBC, or when administered following palliative chemo. Novel approaches are required to broaden clinical benefit of ICB, particularly in PD-L1-negative, HR+, or chemo-experienced MBC. Dual ICB with anti-PD-1 (nivolumab) and anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) is associated with enhanced activity in melanoma other malignancies, but has not been explored extensively in MBC. Androgen receptor (AR) blockade, in addition to known direct cytostatic effects in AR-expressing MBCs (50% of TNBC, > 75% of HR+ MBC), may also modulate immune response. AR blockade has been shown experimentally to stimulate thymic production of naïve T-cell clones, which in turn can facilitate de novo anti-tumor immune responses. Concurrent ICB can enhance the activity of these T-cell clones by interfering with PD-1-mediated peripheral tolerance. This combination approach is promising in MBC in light of known AR positivity, and the routine use of lymphodepleting chemo regimens in the curative-intent setting. Methods: This is a phase II trial of dual immune checkpoint blockade (nivolumab 240mg IV q2w; ipilimumab 1mg/kg IV q6w) plus AR blockade (bicalutamide, 150mg PO daily, dose reduction allowed) in triple-negative MBC (cohort A: AR-positive [ > 1% by IHC]; cohort B: AR-negative) or HR+ MBC (cohort C) in subjects who received 0/1 prior chemotherapies in the non-curative setting. Objectives include 24-week clinical benefit rate by iRECIST (primary), safety (CTCAE v4.0), and other response measures (RECIST1.1, PFS, OS). Efficacy for each cohort is defined as > 20% improvement in response over historical control (30% per EMBRACE clinical trial) employing a Simon 2-stage design to minimize futility (n = 46/cohort, stage I n = 15). Thymic generation of T-cells will be measured via quantitative deep sequencing of T-cell receptors (TcR, ImmunoSEQ assay) and TcR excision circles (TRECs), as well as real-time flow cytometry using surrogate cell surface markers of recent thymic emigration. Enrollment has commenced, sites: Earle A. Chiles Research Institute (Portland, OR), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY). Clinical trial information: NCT03650894.

BackgroundThere has been a dramatic increase in T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing spurred, in part, by the widespread adoption of this technology across academic medical centers and by the rapid commercialization of TCR sequencing. While the raw TCR sequencing data has increased, there has been little in the way of approaches to parse the data in a biologically meaningful fashion. The ability to parse this new type of 'big data' quickly and efficiently to understand the T cell repertoire in a structurally relevant manner has the potential to open the way to new discoveries about how the immune system is able to respond to insults such as cancer and infectious diseases.