This study evaluated the impact and financial costs of childhood cancer for Australian families by means of a nonrandomized retrospective cross-sectional survey at the oncology department of a large metropolitan pediatric hospital. The Family Impact Scale (a standardized questionnaire) and the self-reported economic burden (a questionnaire on expenses and lifestyle changes) were utilized. Results of the family impact score were compared to a previously published cohort of children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The participants were 56 parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer in the year 2002. In addition to the expected high social and emotional impacts, the majority of families reported suffering from great or moderate economic hardship. Factors predictive for families at risk included single parenthood, lower household income, and greater distance from the hospital. The results show that the distribution of resources is not equitable and is currently failing to negate significant financial stresses for many Australian families.

Studies have shown that admission to the hospital of a child can induce feelings of fear and helplessness in parents, challenging usual patterns of coping and parenting competence. Stress has been associated with parents' need to establish effective communication with staff and their need for information, ready access to their children, and participation in decision making relating to their child's care. This study of coping and adjustment was undertaken with the parents, including mothers and fathers, of children under 18 years of age diagnosed with a brain tumor, presenting at Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, between 2001 and 2002 (N=53). It was a prospective study using repeated measures over time. Participants in the study were involved in a questionnaire interview at 4 different points: at the time of diagnosis, 6 months postdiagnosis, 1 year postdiagnosis, and 2 years postdiagnosis, in which they were asked, among other things, about their experience of the hospital. The point of diagnosis was marked by a high level of dependence, with parents coping with rapid decision making and shock, and the surrender of care of their child. Parents identified high levels of information need but noted that they were often too stressed to take in information early on, and that this information need persisted up to the 2-year postdiagnosis point. More parents expressed dissatisfaction with the hospital and particularly with their interactions with the health care team at the 6-month post-diagnosis period, reflecting a possible reduction in attention given to families once they had settled into the treatment routine and the crisis of diagnosis had passed.

Previous studies suggest that support from social networks is a protective factor buffering the negative effects of stressful events, such as having a child with a chronic illness. The literature highlights the need for more systematic examination of parents' social support networks across the disease trajectory, to obtain a more complete understanding of how a family's support system affects adjustment over time. This was attempted in this study of 88 parents of children with brain tumors, recruited from hospitals in Australia, Singapore, and New Zealand. It employed a longitudinal design, tracking families for 2 years postdiagnosis to examine the relationship between social support and coping. As in previous research this study showed that different types of support are needed at different stages in the illness trajectory. The study also identified the use of various coping strategies by families, directed at the maintenance and enhancement of existing supports and the securing of new supports. The study failed to establish a statistically significant relationship between level of coping and social support, however, suggesting that parents were using primarily "internal" familial modes of coping, including preexisting patterns of coping, with external social support being an adjunct to their coping rather than being a major contributor.

This commentary presents personal reflections on the Social Work Leadership Enhancement Program in the Department of Social Work Services at the Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York. The value of the program, not only for the participants from other countries, but also the value of the exposure of social workers from other countries to the department staff is recognized. The international influence is unequalled. How if affects and nurtures global social work thinking, its impact on those taking part in the program, as well as the ever-expanding influence of the program on a growing network of social workers is noted.