Background. Disulfiram, an alcohol aversion agent, has been in use for .50 years. Numerous authors have reported an anticancer effect of this drug in vitro and in mouse models. More recently, several reports have claimed that disulfiram also possesses anti-stem cell activity. We set out to obtain initial data regarding the safety of combining this drug with chemotherapy and the possible effectiveness of disulfiram in a combination regimen in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods. This phase II, multicenter, randomized, doubleblinded study assessed the safety and efficacy of adding of disulfiram to cisplatin and vinorelbine for six cycles. Newly diagnosed NSCLC patients were recruited. Patients with either stage IV or what was considered at the time "wet IIIb" (since 2009, these patients have been considered stage IV) were recruited. The patients were treated with only chemotherapy, and none were treated with either surgery or chemoradiation. Disulfiram was administered at a dose of 40 mg three times daily. Results. Forty patients were treated for more than two cycles, half with and half without disulfiram, which was well tolerated. An increase in survival was noted for the experimental group (10 vs. 7.1 months). Interestingly, there were only two longterm survivors, both in the disulfiram group. Conclusion. The addition of disulfiram to a combination regimen of cisplatin and vinorelbine was well tolerated and appeared to prolong survival in patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer. The results from this small study seem encouraging enough forassessment inlarger trials.Disulfiramis an inexpensive and safe drug; if its addition to chemotherapy could be shown to

No abstract

Background: Intraoperative balloon electronic brachytherapy (IBEB) may provide potential benefit for local control of recurrent cerebral glioblastomas (GBMs). Methods: This is a preliminary report of an open-label, prospective, comparative cohort study conducted in two neurosurgical centers with ongoing follow-up. At recurrence, patients at one center (n = 15) underwent reresection with IBEB while, at the second center (n = 15), control subjects underwent re-resection with various accepted second-line adjuvant chemoradiotherapy options. A comparative analysis of overall survival (OS) and local progression-free survival (LPFS) following re-resection was performed. Exploratory subgroup analysis based on postoperative residual contrast-enhanced volume status was also done. Results: In the IBEB group, median LPFS after re-resection was significantly longer than in the control group (8.0 vs. 6.0 months; log rank χ2 = 4.93, P = 0.026, P < 0.05). In addition, the median OS after second resection in the IBEB group was also significantly longer than in the control group (11.0 vs. 8.0 months; log rank χ2 = 4.23, P = 0.04, P < 0.05). Conclusion: These hypothesis-generating results from a small cohort of subjects suggest putative clinical benefit in OS and LPFS associated with maximal safe re-resection of recurrent GBM with IBEB versus re-resection and standard adjuvant therapy, a hypothesis that deserves further testing in an appropriately powered clinical trial.

Purpose Synchronous bilateral irradiation of both mammary glands and chest wall is a challenging task due to technical difficulties and limited evidence supporting an optimal technique to improve treatment outcomes. We studied and compared the dosimetry data of three radiotherapy techniques to select the most optimal one. Methods We compared three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment (3D CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) during irradiation of synchronous bilateral breast cancer in nine patients followed by examination of dose distribution to the cardiac conduction system (SA node, AV node and Bundle of His), myocardium, lungs, left anterior descending artery (LADA) and right coronary artery (RCA) . Results VMAT is the most sparing technique for SBBC treatment. Even though doses to the SA node, AV node and Bundle of His were higher with VMAT (Dmean were 3.75 ± 0.62, 2.58 ± 0.83 and 3.03 ± 1.18 Gy respectively) compared with 3D CRT (Dmean were 2.61 ± 0.66, 1.52 ± 0.38 and 1.88 ± 0.70 Gy respectively), this difference is statistically insignificant. Doses to the right and left lung (average Dmean = 12.65 ± 3.20 Gy, V20Gy = 24.12 ± 6.25%), myocardium (Dmean = 5.33 ± 1.51 Gy, V10Gy = 9.80 ± 3.83%, V20Gy = 7.19 ± 3.15%, V25Gy = 6.20 ± 2.93%), and LADA (Dmean = 10.04 ± 4.92 Gy, V20Gy = 18.17 ± 13.24% and V25Gy = 15.41 ± 12.19%) were highest with 3D CRT. The highest  Dmean in the cardiac conduction system (5.30 ± 2.23, 3.15 ± 1.61 and 3.89 ± 1.85 Gy respectively) was observed with IMRT, and a similar effect was noted in RCA (Dmean = 7.48 ± 2.11 Gy). Conclusion VMAT is the optimal and satisfactory radiation therapy technique for sparing organs at risk (OARs). With VMAT, a lower Dmean value was noted in the myocardium, LADA, and lungs. The use of 3D CRT significantly increases the dose of radiation reaching the lungs, myocardium, and LADA, which can subsequently cause cardiovascular and lung complications, but not in the cardiac conduction system.

No abstract