The prevalence of masked suboptimal BP control in patients with treated and well-controlled clinic BP is high. Clinic BP monitoring alone is thus inadequate to optimize BP control because many patients have an elevated nocturnal BP. These findings suggest that ABPM should become more routine to confirm BP control, especially in higher risk groups and/or those with borderline control of clinic BP.
A total of 31 healthy volunteers [39 +/- 7 (SD) years] and 18 untreated essential hypertensive subjects [43 +/- 9 years] collected urine for 24 h after a physical examination and laboratory tests. Radioimmunoassay measurements of angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)] in urine and plasma were done as described previously. Sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressures (+/- SD) averaged 118 +/- 11/74 +/- 7 mm Hg and 146 +/- 16/96 +/- 8 mm Hg in normal and essential hypertensive subjects, respectively (P < .001), whereas 24 h urinary volume was not different in normal and essential hypertensive subjects (P > .05). The concentration of Ang-(1-7) in the urine of normal subjects averaged 62.6 +/- 22.6 pmol/L corresponding to a urinary excretion rate of 98.9 +/- 44.7 pmol/24 h. Concurrent measurements of plasma Ang-(1-7) showed that the content of Ang-(1-7) in urine was 2.5-fold higher than that measured in the plasma. In contrast, untreated essential hypertensive subjects had lower concentrations and 24 h urinary excretion rates of Ang-(1-7) averaging 39.4 +/- 18.0 pmol/L and 60.2 +/- 14.6 pmol/24 h, respectively, (P < .001). Differences in the excretory rate of Ang-(1-7) between normal volunteers and essential hypertensive subjects were not modified by normalization of the data by urinary creatinine excretion rates. Urinary concentrations of Ang-(1-7) correlated inversely with systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures (r = -0.48, P < .001). Both urinary Ang-(1-7) [odds ratio of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88-0.97)] and age were independent predictors of systolic blood pressure. These studies demonstrated the presence of Ang-(1-7) in urine and the existence of reduced levels of the heptapeptide in individuals with untreated essential hypertension. The relatively higher concentrations of Ang-(1-7) in urine compared to plasma agrees with data that showed that Ang-(1-7) may contribute to the regulation of blood pressure. The inverse association between Ang-(1-7) and arterial pressure provides a potential marker for the characterization of forms of essential hypertension associated with reduced production or activity of vasodilator hormones.
This study analyzed the relationship between four renin-angiotensin system (RAS) gene polymorphisms and the response to blood pressure lowering and development of microalbuminuria in 206 patients with essential hypertension treated once daily for 12 months with telmisartan 80 mg. Seated cuff blood pressure and urinary albumin excretion (UAE) were measured throughout the study. Patients were screened for the presence of the A-6G variant of the angiotensinogen gene, angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism, and the A1166C and C573T polymorphisms of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene. No significant association was found between the presence of any gene polymorphism and the reduction of blood or UAE following telmisartan treatment. The results indicate that these RAS gene polymorphisms do not affect the antihypertensive activity and renoprotection in mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients treated with telmisartan.
These findings show that among normokalemic treatment-resistant hypertension, the presence of hyperaldosteronism and pheochromocytoma is quite high. Moreover, treatment resistance in hypertensive patients appears to be associated with insulin resistance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.