No abstract

No abstract

Background Studies show that the LGBTQ+ population is particularly vulnerable to suicidal thoughts and behavior. This vulnerability is even more pronounced in the younger population. However, in Switzerland, qualitative studies on this topic are missing. Our study investigates the processual dynamics and background of suicide attempts of LGBTQ+ youths while looking into their subjective meaning. Here, behaviors of help-seeking are also from interest. In addition, the burdens and resources associated with being LGBTQ+ are explored. By better understanding the process of suicide attempts, we can identify relevant contexts of the respondents’ experiences and illustrate how to enhance suicide prevention strategies. We are referring here to the school context. Methods From 2021 until 2024, we interview LGBTQ+ youths in the German- and French-speaking parts of Switzerland who have tried to end their lives between the ages of 14 to 25 (max. three attempts). Applying a multi-perspective approach, we interview persons from their social environment if agreed. Recruitment is based on ‘theoretical sampling’. Data collection and analysis follow the grounded theory methodology. As of July 2022, the sample consists of 18 persons: 3 bisexual women, 1 lesbian woman, 2 gay men, 7 transgender persons, and 5 persons with fluid identities. Results Through preliminary analysis, the school context could be identified as one relevant burdening context in the respondents’ experience and suicide attempt process. In this respect, respondents experienced complicated social relationships: e.g., bullying, social exclusion, and pressure to conform. Moreover, the school environment was experienced by some as LGBTQ+ hostile. Conclusions Our current findings support the necessity to integrate schools as important stakeholders in suicide prevention but highlight a need for LGBTQ-specific and LGBTQ-sensitive orientations to suicide prevention strategies.

Background Families living in poor socio-economic circumstances, already confronted with social and health inequalities, are often not reached by family-based addiction prevention programmes. Besides quantitative models and health literacy approaches, qualitative research is lacking that could shed light on the exact circumstances and processes that lead to hindered addiction prevention service uptake by these families. Drawing on the concept of 'candidacy', we aimed to reconstruct how socio-economically deprived parents and their (pre-)adolescent children in German-speaking Switzerland identify their candidacy for family-based addiction prevention services. Methods Following grounded theory, we collected and analysed data in an iterative-cyclical manner using theoretical sampling and theoretical coding techniques. Sixteen families with children aged 10-14 years were interviewed in depth (parent/s and one child separately). All but one family lived below the at-risk-of poverty threshold. Results Families' modes of recognising and handling problems in everyday life were found to be core phenomena that structure the process towards (non-)identification of candidacy for family-based addiction prevention services. Further, thematic relevance of addiction prevention, past experience with offers, integration in systems of assistance (social welfare, etc.), strategies to protect the family, and parents' search movements for support were important for families' identification of candidacy. Conclusions Socio-economically deprived families are not a homogeneous group. They differ in modes of problem construction and handling in everyday life; this differently opens up or closes routes to family-based addiction prevention services. Policy and practice should build on a bundle of diverse strategies for outreach to these vulnerable families. Key messages Our qualitative study adds scientific knowledge to a better understanding of socio-economically deprived families’ complex routes to family-based addiction prevention services. Results provide evidence that policy and practice should build on a bundle of diverse strategies to reach these vulnerable families. Equity in access to services can thus be improved.

No abstract