Tumors of the spine are challenging in terms of diagnoses and interdisciplinary treatment. This study was conducted to evaluate and characterize a large multicenter cohort of surgically treated spine tumor patients.Data of the German Spine Society (DWG) were used to characterize a cohort of all surgically treated spine tumor cases that were registered between 2017 and 2021. Subgroup analysis was performed for tumor entity, tumor localization, height of most severely affected segments, surgical treatment, and demographic parameters.In total, there were 9686 cases, of which 6747 were “malignant”, 1942 were “primary benign”, 180 were “tumor-like lesions”, and 488 were “other” spinal tumors. Subgroups showed differences in number of affected segments as well as localization. There were further significant differences in surgical complication rates (p = 0.003), age (p < 0.001), morbidity (p < 0.001), and duration of surgery (p = 0.004).This is a representative study on spinal tumors from a large spine registry and allows for the epidemiological characterization of surgically treated tumor subgroups and quality control of registry data.
Study Design. Retrospective cohort study. Objective. The aim was to compare the influence of 2 common vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) causing pathogens on treatment failure within the first year of diagnosis. Summary of Background Data. VO is mainly caused by Staphylococcus aureus (SA), while enterococci and streptococci (ENST) are also responsible for a significant proportion of VO, particularly in elderly patients. Data on VO caused by SA show a tendency for worse outcome, whereas data on VO caused by ENST are scarce. For this purpose, our study compares characteristics of patients with VO caused by SA or ENST in order to analyze risk factors for treatment failure. Methods. We conducted a retrospective monocentric study including VO patients from 2008 to 2020. Primary outcome was treatment failure defined as death or relapse within 1 year (T1). We compared patients diagnosed with VO caused by Staphylococcus aureus including MRSA to patients diagnosed with VO caused by Enterococcus and Streptococcus species, which were combined into one group. Polymicrobial infections were excluded. We employed multiple logistic regression analysis to adjust for confounding. To account for moderation, the model was repeated with an included interaction term. Results. Data of 130 VO patients (SA=95; ENST=35) were available at T1. Treatment failure occurred in 37% of SA patients and 23% of ENST patients. On multivariate analysis SA [odds ratio (OR): 3.12; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09–10.53; P=0.046], Charlson comorbidity index (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.11–1.58; P=0.002) and infectious endocarditis (IE; OR: 4.29; 95% CI: 1.23–15.96; P=0.024) were identified as independent risk factors for treatment failure. Conclusion. In our cohort every third patient with VO caused by SA or ENST dies within 1 year. Our findings indicate that patients with VO caused by SA, concomitant IE and/or a high Charlson comorbidity index score may be at elevated risk for treatment failure. These findings can be used to individualize patient care and to direct clinical surveillance. This could include echocardiography evaluating for the presence of IE in patients with VO caused by gram-positive pathogens.
Objective To assess which radiological alignment parameters are associated with a satisfactory long‐term clinical outcome after performing lumbar spinal fusion for treating degenerative spondylolisthesis. Methods This single‐center prospective study assessed the relation between radiological alignment parameters measured on standing lateral lumbar spine radiographs and the patient‐reported outcome using four different questionnaires (COMI, EQ‐5D, ODI and VAS) as primary outcome measures (level of evidence: II). The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were used: gliding angle, sacral inclination, anterior displacement, sagittal rotation, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt and pelvic incidence. Furthermore, the length of stay and perioperative complications were documented. Only cases from 2013 to 2015 of low‐grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (Meyerding grades I and II) were considered. The patients underwent open posterior lumbar fusion surgery by pedicle screw instrumentation and cage insertion. The operative technique was either a posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) or a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) performed by three different senior orthopedic surgeons. Exclusion criteria were spine fractures, minimally invasive techniques, underlying malignant diseases or acute infections, previous or multisegmental spine surgery as well as preoperative neurologic impairment. Of 89 initially contacted patients, 17 patients were included for data analysis (11 males, six females). Results The data of 17 patients after mono‐ or bisegmental lumbar fusion surgery to treat low‐grade lumbar spondylolisthesis and with a follow‐up time of least 72 months were analyzed. The mean age was 66.7 ± 11.3 years. In terms of complications two dural tears and one intraoperative bleeding occurred. The average body mass index (BMI) was 27.6 ± 4.4 kg/m 2 and the average inpatient length of stay was 12.9 ± 3.8 days (range: 8–21). The long‐term clinical outcome correlated significantly with the change of the pelvic tilt ( r s = −0.515, P < 0.05) and the sagittal rotation ( r s = −0.545, P < 0.05). The sacral slope was significantly associated with the sacral inclination ( r s = 0.637, P < 0.01) and the pelvic incidence ( r s = 0.500, P < 0.05). In addition, the pelvic incidence showed a significant correlation with the pelvic tilt ( r s = 0.709, P < 0.01). The change of the different clinical scores over time also correlated significantly between the different questionnaires. Conclusions The surgical modification of the pelvic tilt and...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.