Use of a digital preparation assistant system may improve considerably the quality of preclinical dental education, provided the system works reliably. Thus, the purpose of this pilot study was to quantitatively assess the reliability of a new preclinical digital preparation assistant system (PREPassist, KaVo, Germany). The system was used to repeatedly scan four different unprepared and four different prepared teeth both with and without repositioning. Corresponding measurements were made to quantify accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility. This was done by estimating the measurement error. Based on this estimation, respective limits of agreement were calculated. We used these ranges, along with assessments of the measurement's accuracy, to judge whether the results satisfy our expectations for clinically acceptable measurements. For preclinical laboratory instruction, the results indicate an acceptable accuracy (mean accuracy of 89 µm) of the measurements. This assessment applies as well to repeatability, given by the range of the respective limits of agreement (range <200 µm). However, in the case of reproducibility, the limits revealed discrepancies of practical importance (range >200 µm). Reproducibility of tooth repositioning in the available mounting device is unacceptable for preclinical laboratory instruction because of the observed range >200 µm. Thus, there is a need for the manufacture of new and more reliable mounting devices because reproducibility procedures are mostly encountered in preclinical instruction in restorative techniques. In contrast to reproducibility, accuracy and repeatability are acceptable for practical purposes. Balancing advantages and disadvantages, we conclude that, in general, the PREPassist system delivers reliable results.

No abstract