Phlebolymphedema is a condition of mixed venous and lymphatic insufficiency. It is usually not recognized and it is usually not treated. The lymphatic and venous systems are intimately interrelated. In the presence of venous hypertension, which is characteristic of most venous disorders, the increase in lymphatic flow becomes much greater than the lymph transport capacity. The diagnosis of phlebolymphedema is based on a detailed history and physical examination. Patients with phlebolymphedema have skin changes of venous insufficiency, which are easy to recognize. Treatment for chronic phlebolymphedema consists of treating the venous abnormality and watching regression of the lymphatic problem.
Sclerosant foam has been increasing in use in recent times. It has certain advantages over liquid sclerosants and is quite safe to use, despite the fact that there are adverse events that have been reported. The history of sclerosant foam goes back in time many years. Tessari developed the current method of creating sclerosant foam in 2001, and his technique has been modified. In our experience, the sclerosant foam has totally replaced other methods of treating venous insufficiency, and the results of treatment are superior to other methods. It is apparent that treatment of a variety of venous disorders can be accomplished using foam sclerotherapy. Our experience and that of others has shown that there are early advantages in the use of foam in the management of varicose veins compared with surgery and other methods.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to investigate the anatomical patterns of superficial venous reflux in patients presenting with primary varicose veins.
Methods
Ultrasound scans, detailed vein maps, and histories of patients presenting to a single vein center were retrospectively reviewed. Patients included in the study were those presenting with primary varicose veins and classified as clinical, etiologic, anatomic, and pathophysiologic classes 2 through 4. Patients with histories of venous intervention, malformations, active ulcerations, or deep system abnormalities were excluded from this study.
Results
Overall, 1,027 limbs of 617 patients met the inclusion criterion. The male to female ratio was 1:6.0. Varicose veins were attributed to reflux in the great saphenous vein (GSV) 66% (n = 679) of the time. When GSV reflux was present, the saphenofemoral junction was incompetent 83% of the time. Six percent of varicose veins were attributed to the anterior accessory saphenous vein. Small saphenous vein (SSV) reflux was demonstrated in 34.8% (n = 357). The thigh extension of the SSV and vein of Giacomini demonstrated reflux in 7% (n = 69) and 1% (n = 15) of limbs, respectively. Reflux of nonsaphenous origin was present in 19% (n = 198) of limbs (isolated tributary reflux).
Conclusion
The variations of superficial venous reflux in patients presenting with primary varicose veins are diverse and complex. Therefore, thorough duplex ultrasound is necessary in all patients with primary varicose veins to evaluate the precise source of reflux to determine therapeutic options.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.