Smoking, denture wearing while sleeping, denture cleanser usage, denture type, and resting saliva pH are important predictors of the deterioration of ARDLs over time.
Usually, the dentist examines and diagnoses concerns based on a patient's complaint and addresses these concerns by adjusting the denture. However, the most frequently reported problems with dentures are related to new dentures, such as sore spots, painful gums and general discomfort, which might be differently perceived by each patient, 1 and thus, the perception of each patient might make denture management more difficult. 2 Therefore, if diagnosis and pain sensitivity prediction for the patient were standardised, it would help draft an appropriate treatment plan and to predicting the number of times that a denture needs to be adjusted.
SummaryBackground: There is little evidence regarding the reliability of CPT and PT measurements to gauge mandibular perception. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the testretest reliability of CPT and PT values obtained from the mandibular oral mucosa and to test the bilateral differences in CPT and PT values obtained from the mental foramen region and buccal shelf region by a single operator.Methods: CPT and PT values were obtained from the mental foramen and buccal shelf regions of 20 volunteers (10 males and 10 females; average age: 26.4 ± 2.6 years) by using the Neurometer CPT/C® device to deliver electrical stimulation.Results: Relative and absolute reliabilities were confirmed over two measurements of CPT and PT over a 7-to 10-day measurement interval. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) for CPT and PT table obtained from the mental foramen region were >0.8, while most ICC for the buccal shelf region were <0.8. Standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change and Bland-Altman analyses showed that the CPT and PT measurements had no systematic error and could serve as useful methods. At all frequencies, the bilateral difference in CPT and PT values at the mental foramen and buccal shelf region was not significant.Conclusion: CPT and PT measurements using a custom-made device that applied an electrical current to the mental foramen region have appropriate reliability to assess intra-oral sensitivity to electrical stimulation in young adults.
K E Y W O R D Scurrent stimulus, oral cavity, oral mucosa, pain threshold, reliability, transcranial direct current stimulation
The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics of the pain tolerance threshold (PTT) induced by electrical stimulation of the alveolar ridge. A total of 100 healthy volunteers studying or working at Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo and patients from Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo Affiliated Hospital, including 51 men (58.7 ± 17.6 years old) and 49 women (60.7 ± 17.1 years old), participated in this study. The volunteers were enrolled after obtaining written informed consent. PTT measurements were obtained using a Neurometer CPT/C® device to deliver electrical stimulation around the left greater palatine foramen at frequencies of 5 and 250 Hz. When the stimulus could no longer be tolerated, the participant released a button to automatically discontinue the stimulus. After the distribution of the PTT values was analyzed, the influence of gender, age, and Eichner index on PTT was analyzed. The Eichner index values were divided into three categories: group A (four supporting zones), group B (less than four supporting zones but with anterior tooth contact), and group C (no occlusal contact). The PTT values did not show a normal distribution. There were no significant differences in PTT between men and women. PTT was significantly associated with age (P = 0.017) at 5 Hz in men. There were no significant differences in PTT among the Eichner index groups. The characteristics of the PTT of the alveolar ridge are as follows: (1) age and PTT at 5 Hz are significantly associated with men but not with women, and (2) the Eichner index has no influence on the PTT.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.