This study aimed to verify whether the incidence of frailty in elderly individuals is
higher among those who are housebound than those who are not. This study found no
correlation between elderly people’s houseboundedeness and physical, mental, social, and
overall frailty. However, the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) frailty score and grip
strength value were higher in non-housebound elderly persons than in housebound elderly
ones. This suggests that being housebound may lead to frailty. On the other hand, it is
thought that individual interaction with family and friends, and lack of anxiety about
falls correlates with the prevention of frailty in housebound elderly persons. The results
of the study also suggest that the basic checklist may be effective for ascertaining the
actual situation of housebound elderly people who may be manifesting frailty.
Objective: Physical frailty has been considered a risk factor for certification of long-term care needs (hereafter referred to as Certification) under Japan's long-term care insurance (LTCI). Therefore, assessment of frailty in elders should be studied from multiple perspectives. The Kihon Checklist (KCL) is widely used to identify need for support/care among Japanese older adults. This study aims to examine the relationship between changes in KCL items and Certification among Japan's young-old and old-old. Material and Methods: The KCL responses of 7,092 participants were assessed in April 2012 and March 2016, along with gender, age, and living environment. Deaths, Certifications, and relocations were tracked until March 2018. Changes in KCL items were categorized as bad, worse, improved, or good. Results: Between March 2016 and March 2018, about 7.3% of respondents obtained Certifications. KCL item changes increased the risk of new Certification for bad and worse groups, while improved cognitive function among the old-old possibly reduced the risk of new Certification. Conclusion: Therefore, rather than administering the KCL once, identifying KCL changes among people at risk could help prevent or delay their need for long-term care.
The purpose of this cohort study is to clarify the risk factors of low well-being of
elderly people who residing in a local city of a super-aging country, Japan.
Subjects are people, who have selected randomly from healthy elderly people resided in
Kizugawa City, Kyoto Prefecture, in 2010, followed until 2015. Question survey was
conducted in both year, and questionnaire consisted of items such as basic attributes,
lifestyles (health practices, consultation behaviors, social activities and so on) and
well-being (WHO-5). In analysis we made multi-logistic regression analysis using lifestyle
variables as an independent variable and well-being as a dependent variable.
The results were as follows.
1. Risk factors were not to exercise, knowledge of appropriate diet, subjective feeling
of stress for at least a month, not to participate in voluntary activities, age and bad
subjective feeling of health.
2. Risk factors in regard to changes of lifestyles using good-good lifestyles as a
reference were sustainment of having no time for hobby or relaxation, sustainment or
deterioration of subject feeling of stress for at least a month, sustainment or
deterioration of having no time for relaxation and deterioration of having no activities
with pleasure or aim. A factor promoting well-being is to have more frequencies for going
out home.
This study shows that in a longevity society it is important for community-dwelling
elderly Japanese to have good health practices, appropriate consultation behaviors and
good social activities for the purpose of keeping good well-being, and that these results
are contributed to health promotion policy for community-dwelling elderly people.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.