<b><i>Background:</i></b> Related studies have demonstrated a relationship of elevated serum uric levels with a decline in kidney function. However, limited evidence exists in a Southeast Asian community-based population. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The study aimed to examine the relationship between serum uric acid levels and impaired renal function. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A prospective cohort study was conducted in the Thai army health checkup population between July 1, 2006 and December 31, 2012. Inclusion criteria included age older than 20 years and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over 60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between incidence of impaired renal function and baseline serum uric acid quartiles. Impaired renal function was defined as eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> over 3 months. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 9,534 participants (7,474 men and 2,060 women) were enrolled. Cox regression analysis revealed a significant association of serum uric acid level with impaired renal function in the whole population as the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) of impaired renal function in second, third, and fourth quartiles were 2.1 (1.39, 3.17), 2.39 (1.6, 3.59), and 3.94 (2.71, 5.74), respectively, when compared with serum uric acid in the first quartile, respectively. After adjusting in 2 models, the HR still significantly persisted with similar magnitudes in all quartiles. Higher incidences of impaired renal function were observed among males than among females in all quartiles. Kaplan-Meier curve showed better renal survival rate in the lower quartile groups. Linear regression analysis showed that eGFR negatively correlated with serum uric acid (<i>r</i> = −0.213, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our study suggests that an independent association exists of serum uric acid levels with the incidence of impaired renal function and renal progression in the Southeast Asian community-based population.
Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac channelopathy with variable expressivity that can lead to sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). Studies worldwide suggest that BrS and Brugada pattern (BrP) have low prevalences in general. However, studies also note that BrS is most prevalent among certain Asian populations. Among the different global regions, the highest prevalence is believed to be in Southeast Asia, followed by the Middle East, South Asia, East Asia, Europe, and North America. It is not only important to recognize such varying degrees of BrS prevalence within Asia but also to understand that there may be significant differences in terms of presenting symptoms, occult risk factors, and the impact on clinical outcomes. The importance of identifying such differences lies in the necessity to develop improved risk assessment strategies to guide secondary prevention and treatment for these patients. Specifically, the decision to pursue placement of an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) can be lifesaving for high-risk BrS patients. However, there remains a significant lack of consensus on how to best risk stratify BrS patients. While the current guidelines recommend ICD implantation in patients with spontaneous Type 1 ECG pattern BrS who present with syncope, there may still exist additional clinical factors that may serve as better predictors or facilitate more refined risk stratification before malignant arrhythmias occur. This carries huge relevance given that BrS patients often do not have any preceding symptoms prior to SCA. This review seeks to delineate the differences in BrS presentation and prevalence within the Asian continent in the hope of identifying potential risk factors to guide better prognostication and management of BrS patients in the future.
Background Albuminuria is an established risk marker for both cardiovascular and renal outcomes. In this study, we expected to use portable and inexpensive test strips to detect urine albumin level for risk stratification in cardiovascular and renal outcomes among rural Thai community. Objective To evaluate the relationship between urine albumin dipstick and cardiovascular and renal complications in rural Thai population. Methods We conducted a retrospective study in 635 rural Thai adults who tested urine albuminuria by using commercial urine albumin dipstick and the Micral-albumin test II strips at baseline. The subjects were divided into normoalbuminuria (albumin < 20 mg/L), microalbuminuria (albumin 20–200 mg/L), or macroalbuminuria (Urine dipstick at least 1+ or albumin > 200 mg/L). We collected data on the incidences of primary composite outcomes including cardiovascular or renal morbidity and mortality. Incident density and cox regression were analyzed to evaluate the association between albuminuria status and primary composite outcome. Results During an average 14-year follow-up, 102 primary composite events occurred including 59 (13.1%), 32 (20.6%) and 11 (39.3%) among 452, 155, and 28 subjects with normoalbuminuria, microalbuminuria, and macroalbuminuria, respectively. Incident densities of primary composite outcome were elevated continually according to the degree of albuminuria (9.36, 17.11 and 38.12 per 1000 person-years). Compared with the subjects without albuminuria, subjects with microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria at baseline had higher risk for primary composite outcome in univariate model. After multivariate analysis was performed, the effect of macroalbuminuria was only persisted with 3.13-fold risk (adjusted HR 3.13; 95% CI 1.40–6.96, P= 0.005). Conclusion Albuminuria from semi-quantitative methods is an important factor predicting cardiovascular and renal risk among subjects in Thai rural population. Our findings support to also incorporating urine albumin dipstick into assessments of cardiovascular risk in the general population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.