NFD is a severe and usually progressive systemic fibrotic disease affecting the dermis, subcutaneous fascia, and striated muscles. It also appears that the disease can cause fibrosis of lungs, myocardium, and other organs.
Objective. Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy (NFD) is a newly recognized cutaneous fibrotic disorder occurring in individuals with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).The aim of the present study was to describe the clinical and histopathologic features of 9 new cases and to characterize the inflammatory cells and expression of transforming growth factor 1 (TGF1) in affected skin.Methods. Clinical and laboratory assessments, including serology and pulmonary function studies, were performed in 9 patients undergoing long-term dialysis (8 hemodialysis; 1 peritoneal dialysis) for ESRD of diverse etiologies. Skin, fascia, striated muscles, lungs, and heart were examined by histopathology. Inflammatory cells were characterized by immunophenotyping using specific monoclonal antibodies. TGF1 expression was determined by in situ hybridization.Results. All patients displayed cutaneous features resembling both systemic sclerosis and diffuse fasciitis, with severe loss of motion and flexion contractures in multiple joints. Six patients displayed woody induration of the muscles of the legs, thighs, and forearms. Five of the 6 patients with lung involvement had a reduced diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide on pulmonary function testing. Marked elevations of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and/or C-reactive protein level were found in 6 patients. Antinuclear antibodies were present at low titers in 4 patients. Histopathologic studies indicated that in addition to the dermis, the fibrotic process affected the subcutaneous tissue, fascia, striated muscles, lungs, and myocardium. Large numbers of CD68؉/factor XIIIa؉ dendritic cells and increased expression of TGF1 were found in affected skin and muscle.Conclusion. Our findings indicate that the fibrotic process of NFD affects not only the dermis, but also the subcutaneous tissues, fascia, and other organs, including striated muscles, heart, and lungs. We therefore believe this is a systemic fibrosing process, and we suggest that dialysis-associated systemic fibrosis would be a better term for the condition.Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy (NFD) is a newly recognized cutaneous fibrotic disorder occurring in individuals with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (1,2). With a few exceptions, the nearly 100 patients described to date were undergoing long-term hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis and many had received kidney transplants. Although the etiologic factor(s) responsible for NFD is not known, renal insufficiency and dialysis appear to be intimately involved (for review, see ref.3).Initially, this fibrotic process was considered a form of scleromyxedema (1); however, subsequent studies indicated that the disease was unique (2). The histopathologic changes in affected skin included Dr. Jiménez's work was supported by NIH grant AR-19161.
Objective T cells play a key role in the pathogenesis of early systemic sclerosis. This study was undertaken to assess the safety and efficacy of abatacept in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). Methods In this 12‐month, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial, participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either subcutaneous abatacept 125 mg or matching placebo, stratified by duration of dcSSc. Escape therapy was allowed at 6 months for worsening disease. The coprimary end points were change in the modified Rodnan skin thickness score (MRSS) compared to baseline and safety over 12 months. Differences in longitudinal outcomes were assessed according to treatment using linear mixed models, with outcomes censored after initiation of escape therapy. Skin tissue obtained from participants at baseline was classified into intrinsic gene expression subsets. Results Among 88 participants, the adjusted mean change in the MRSS at 12 months was −6.24 units for those receiving abatacept and −4.49 units for those receiving placebo, with an adjusted mean treatment difference of −1.75 units (P = 0.28). Outcomes for 2 secondary measures (Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index and a composite measure) were clinically and statistically significantly better with abatacept. The proportion of subjects in whom escape therapy was needed was higher in the placebo group relative to the abatacept group (36% versus 16%). In the inflammatory and normal‐like skin gene expression subsets, decline in the MRSS over 12 months was clinically and significantly greater in the abatacept group versus the placebo group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.03, respectively). In the abatacept group, adverse events occurred in 35 participants versus 40 participants in the placebo group, including 2 deaths and 1 death, respectively. Conclusion In this phase II trial, abatacept was well‐tolerated, but change in the MRSS was not statistically significant. Secondary outcome measures, including gene expression subsets, showed evidence in support of abatacept. These data should be confirmed in a phase III trial.
RationaleClinical trial design in interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) has been hampered by lack of consensus on appropriate outcome measures for reliably assessing treatment response. In the setting of connective tissue diseases (CTDs), some measures of ILD disease activity and severity may be confounded by non-pulmonary comorbidities.MethodsThe Connective Tissue Disease associated Interstitial Lung Disease (CTD-ILD) working group of Outcome Measures in Rheumatology—a non-profit international organisation dedicated to consensus methodology in identification of outcome measures—conducted a series of investigations which included a Delphi process including >248 ILD medical experts as well as patient focus groups culminating in a nominal group panel of ILD experts and patients. The goal was to define and develop a consensus on the status of outcome measure candidates for use in randomised controlled trials in CTD-ILD and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).ResultsA core set comprising specific measures in the domains of lung physiology, lung imaging, survival, dyspnoea, cough and health-related quality of life is proposed as appropriate for consideration for use in a hypothetical 1-year multicentre clinical trial for either CTD-ILD or IPF. As many widely used instruments were found to lack full validation, an agenda for future research is proposed.ConclusionIdentification of consensus preliminary domains and instruments to measure them was attained and is a major advance anticipated to facilitate multicentre RCTs in the field.
Working with cultured dermal fibroblasts derived from control individuals and patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), we have examined the effects of protein kinase C-delta (PKC-delta) on type I collagen biosynthesis and steady-state levels of COL1A1 and COL3A1 mRNAs. Rottlerin, a specific inhibitor of PKC-delta, exerted a powerful, dose-dependent inhibition of type I and type III collagen gene expression in normal and SSc cells. Optimal rottlerin concentrations caused a 70-90% inhibition of type I collagen production, a >80% reduction in COL1A1 mRNA, and a >70% reduction in COL3A1 mRNA in both cell types. In vitro nuclear transcription assays and transient transfections with COL1A1 promoter deletion constructs demonstrated that rottlerin profoundly reduced COL1A1 transcription and that this effect required a 129-bp promoter region encompassing nucleotides -804 to -675. This COL1A1 segment imparted rottlerin sensitivity to a heterologous promoter. Cotransfections of COL1A1 promoter constructs with a dominant-negative PKC-delta expression plasmid showed that suppression of this kinase silenced COL1A1 promoter activity. The results indicate that PKC-delta participates in the upregulation of collagen gene transcription in SSc and suggest that treatment with PKC-delta inhibitors could suppress fibrosis in this disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.