Tasik Puteri is a recreational lake for few activities such as scuba diving, kayaking and swimming during the dry season. However, this lake was an iron ore mining site and the remaining contaminants and heavy metal of the lake can harm the people that directly get into contact with the lake water. The present study focused on investigating the phytoremediation potential of locally available floating aquatic plants in the treatment process of water from Tasik Puteri, which was contaminated with mining effluent. The effluent was treated with water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) and water lettuces (Salvinia molesta and Pistia stratiotes) in a constructed wetland for a period of 28 days. The effluent treatment efficiency was estimated by measuring the effluent quality over the experimental period. Five water parameters such as the total iron (TI), total phosphorus (TP), chemical oxygen demand (COD), electrical conductivity (EC) and turbidity were examined using standard laboratory procedures, which include. The results indicated that the three plants were able to remove the contaminants. After 28 days, the physical observation shows that the water hyacinth was healthier than the water lettuces. Considerable decrements in concentration were recorded in TI, TP and EC, but fluctuation in COD and turbidity value were observed. Comparison results by the plants indicat that after 28 days, water hyacinth was the most effective plant in removing phosporus, COD and EC of the mining lake with 97.3%, 70.5% and 22.2% removal, respectively. Furthermore, water lettuce (P. stratiotes) was the most effective plant in removing Iron (96.0%) and the turbidity (50.0%) of the mining lake. S. molesta showed the lowest removal capability for all experimental parameters. In conclusion, water hyacinth and water lettuces had shown better capability in removing heavy metals and other contaminants with E. crassipes has the highest survivability in the lake water.
Poor water quality due to heavy metal content in Tasik Puteri can harm people that directly get into contact with it for recreational activities. Thus, this study investigated the phytoremediation potential of locally aquatic plants to remediate the lake water. Scirpus grosus and Eleocharis dulcis were planted in constructed wetlands for 28 days. The water analysis was performed to measure turbidity, total iron (TI), total phosphorus (TP), chemical oxygen demand (COD) and electrical conductivity (EC). After 28 days, S. grosus was observed to be healthier. Fluctuation readings were recorded in turbidity value and considerable decrements in TI, TP, COD and EC. S. grosus exhibits higher removal of TI, EC and turbidity which 95.45%, 32.89% and 40.00% removal respectively, whilst E. dulcis removed 65.28% of COD. Both plants demonstrated comparable TP removal with 92.04% and 91.04% by S. grosus and E. dulcis respectively. In conclusion, S. grosus is proven as the more effective phytoremediator.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.