Protein-energy wasting (PEW) is highly prevalent in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We investigated the association of abnormal ankle brachial index (ABI), PEW, and chronic inflammation status with clinical prognosis in HD patients. A total of 973 HD patients were enrolled and were followed-up for 8 years. As a marker of the PEW, geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) was used. Cut-off levels were 91.2 for GNRI defined from previous studies and 1.9 mg/L for C-reactive protein (CRP) as median value, respectively. Abnormal ABI was seen in 332 (34.1%) patients. Declined GNRI and elevated CRP levels were independently associated with abnormal ABI (odds ratio (OR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96–0.99, p = 0.0009 and OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.07–1.83, p = 0.013, respectively). GNRI levels were also independently correlated with CRP levels (β = −0.126, p < 0.0001). During follow-up period, 283 (29.1%) patients died, including 123 (12.6%) due to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Abnormal ABI (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.62, 95% CI 1.13–2.32, p = 0.0096), GNRI < 91.2 (adjusted HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.06–2.33, p = 0.023) and CRP > 1.9 mg/L (adjusted HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.31–2.77, p = 0.0007) independently predicted mortality due to CVD, respectively. In conclusion, abnormal ABI, GNRI, and CRP levels were closely associated with each other, and the combination of these variables increase their predictive values for the risk of mortality due to CVD and all-cause mortality in HD patients.
STEMI receiving PCI has not been evaluated sufficiently with regard to overall mortality and non-home discharge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of CFS with these clinical outcomes of octogenarian patients with STEMI. Methods Study Design and Population We screened the Nagoya multicenter registry for the data of consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI between January 2014 and December 2016 (n=1,301). The registry is an ongoing, retrospective, multicenter registry of coronary artery disease and current data include information from 5 institutions in the Tokai area, details of which have been described previously. 10 Of the
BackgroundSerum lactate level can predict clinical outcomes in some critical cases. In the clinical setting, we noted that patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) and with poor serum lactate improvement often do not recover from cardiopulmonary arrest. Therefore, we investigated the association between lactate clearance and in-hospital mortality in cardiac arrest patients undergoing ECPR.MethodsSerum lactate levels were measured on admission and every hour after starting ECPR. Lactate clearance [(lactate at first measurement − lactate 6 h after)/lactate at first measurement × 100] was calculated 6 h after first serum lactate measurement. All patients who underwent ECPR were registered retrospectively using opt-out in our outpatient’s segment.ResultIn this retrospective study, 64 cases were evaluated, and they were classified into two groups according to lactate clearance: high-clearance group, > 65%; low-clearance group, ≤ 65%. Surviving discharge rate of high-clearance group (12 cases, 63%) is significantly higher than that of low-clearance group (11 cases, 24%) (p < 0.01). Considering other confounders, lactate clearance was an independent predictor for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 7.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.71–29.5; p < 0.01). Both net reclassification improvement (0.64, p < 0.01) and integrated reclassification improvement (0.12, p < 0.01) show that adding lactate clearance on established risk factors improved the predictability of in-hospital mortality.ConclusionIn our study, lactate clearance calculated through arterial blood gas analysis 6 h after ECPR was one of the most important predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients treated with ECPR after cardiac arrest.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.