No abstract

A new supersymmetric standard model based on Nϭ1 supergravity is constructed, aiming at a natural explanation of proton stability without invoking an ad hoc discrete symmetry through R parity. The proton is protected from decay by an extra U͑1͒ gauge symmetry. The particle content is necessarily increased to be free from anomalies, making it possible to incorporate the superfields for right-handed neutrinos and an SU͑2͒-singlet Higgs boson. The vacuum expectation value of this Higgs boson, which induces spontaneous breakdown of U͑1͒ symmetry, yields large Majorana masses for the right-handed neutrinos, leading to small masses for the ordinary neutrinos. The linear coupling of SU͑2͒-doublet Higgs superfields, which is indispensable to the superpotential of the minimal supersymmetric standard model, is replaced by a trilinear coupling of the Higgs superfields, so that there is no mass parameter in the superpotential. The energy dependencies of the model parameters are studied, showing that gauge symmetry breaking is induced by radiative corrections. Certain ranges of the parameter values compatible with phenomena at the electroweak energy scale can be derived from universal values of masses-squared and trilinear coupling constants for scalar fields at a very high energy scale.

We study systematically the dependence of the neutralino mass eigenvalues and eigenstates on the parameters of the mixing matrix. Starting from analytical solutions for special values of the parameters we work out various practical approximation formulas for the masses. We examine their applicability in the different regions of parameters accessible with the next generation of accelerators.

The electric dipole moment of the neutron in the supersymmetric standard models is reconsidered. Assuming CP-violating phases are not much suppressed, we explore the region of the supersymmetric mass parameters allowed by the experiments. The chargino-loop diagram gives constraints more stringently than the gluino-and neutralino-loop diagrams. It is found that the squark masses should be larger than -1 TeV, while the charginos and the neutralinos could be as light as a few hundred GeV. PACS number(s1: 13.40.Fn, 11.30.Er, 12.15.Ji, 14.80.Ly It was found soon after supersymmetric grand unified models were proposed [I] that the electric dipole moment (EDM) of the neutron could have a large value in the supersymmetric extensions of the standard model [2,3]. If CP-violating phases inherent in these supersymmetric standard models are of order unity and supersymmetric particles have masses of order 100 GeV, then the EDM of the neutron is predicted to be 1 0 -~~-1 0 -~~e cm.From the experimental bounds d , 1 < 1oP2'e cm 141, therefore, it is usually considered that the ~p-violatIng phases would be quite small [2,3,5]. However, the supersymmetric particles might not be as light as 100 GeV, since no signal has been found up to now in high-energy collider experiments. Moreover, the natural magnitudes of the CP-violating phases should be of order unity unless there is some mystic symmetry forcing the phases to vanish. We may have to reconsider what the EDM of the neutron implies for the supersymmetric standard models.In this Brief Report we discuss the EDM of the neutron in a manner alternative to the conventional one. If the supersymmetric particles are heavy enough, the CPviolating phases do not have to be unnaturally small. Assuming that the CP-violating phases are not suppressed, we explore the values of the supersymmetric mass parameters compatible with the experiments [6]. For definiteness, our discussions are based on the standard N = 1 supergravity models [7].There are three operators contributing to the EDM of the neutron: the quark electric dipole operator, the Weinberg gluonic operator, and the quark chromoelectric dipole operator [8,9]. These operators get non-negligible QCD corrections. In this Brief Report, however, we shall discuss only the familiar quark electric dipole operator and shall not take the QCD correction into consideration. This would be justified from the following two points. First, these gluonic contributions would be smaller than that of the quark electric dipole operator contrary to the case in the nonsupersymmetric standard model. Second, we can get at least the necessary conditions of being not contradictory to the experiments because the QCD correction does not reduce the contribu-tion of the quark electric dipole operator.The quark electric dipole operator is contributed to at the one-loop level by the Feynman diagrams in which propagate the squarks and one of the charginos mi, the neutralinos xi, and the gluinos g. These EDM operators change the chirality of the quark. In the chargino...