Professional identities research in medical education has made significant contributions to the field. However, what comprises professional identities is rarely interrogated. This research tackles this relatively understudied component of professional identities research by understanding emergency medicine physicians' perspectives on the important elements that comprise their professional identities. Q-methodology was used to identify different clusters of viewpoints on professional identities; by extension, the core components that comprise emergency medicine physicians' professional identities are disclosed. Thirtythree emergency medicine physicians were recruited, through purposive sampling, from five hospitals across Taiwan. R software was used to analyse the Q-sorts, determine loadings on each viewpoint and formulate the viewpoint array. Analysis of interview data enhanced our understanding of these viewpoints. In total, twenty-five emergency medicine physicians loaded onto four distinct viewpoints, reflecting dominant perspectives of emergency medicine physicians' understanding of their professional identities. These distinct viewpoints demonstrated what emergency medicine physicians deemed significant in how they understood themselves. The viewpoints comprised: skills acquisition, capabilities and practical wisdom; coping ability and resilience; professional recognition and self-esteem; and wellbeing and quality of life. All viewpoints stressed the importance of trust between colleagues. These findings demonstrate the multitude of ways in which seemingly unified professional identities diverge across groups of individuals. An enhanced understanding of speciality work culture is gained. By understanding facets of professional identities, the development of future educational interventions and departmental initiatives, which might support key components of professional identities, can be explored.

BackgroundMedical students in block clerkships constantly adapt to new environments and learn to interact with new people as they rotate between specialties. This frequent change potentially limited interns' opportunities for participation in real clinical practice. The aims of this study were to explore interns' conceptualization of their learning opportunities and experiences in the workplace during an emergency medicine (EM) block internship. In addition, the study also explored how participating in the pre-rotation high-fidelity simulation (HFS) orientation influenced interns' perception of their transition, participation and learning experiences in the real EM setting.MethodsWe implemented a newly developed pre-EM rotation orientation curriculum for interns. This orientation took place on the first day of the 2-week EM internship rotation. Two focus group discussions were held after each simulation training, one immediately after simulation to understand the students' perception and the educational impact of this activity, the other at the end of EM rotation to explore and compare their roles and perception in both simulation activity and the real clinical practice. A total of 151 seventh-year medical students enrolled in the pre-course HFS and post-hoc focus group discussions between 2017 and 2019. We applied thematic analysis to systemically identify, examine, and construct themes.ResultsFour major themes were constructed from the data; 1. Challenges in finding authentic learning experiences within the context of emergency medicine; 2. Effectiveness of the pre-course HFS 3. Limitations of EM internship rotation curriculum and pre-course simulation. 4. Suggestions for EM block-internship curriculum reforms. Our study's key findings indicate that pre-rotation orientation HFS activity, which offered a psychologically safe space for students to explore facets of EM and gain a contextualized understanding of the emergency work culture and environment, was essential for enhancing students' ability to identify and maximize practice affordances in real workplace.ConclusionSimulation, facilitates interns' negotiation of legitimate peripheral participation opportunities as they transition into the EM community of practice during their block internship rotation; putting students at the center of the learning process.

Background Physicians’ values about what constitute their professional identities are integral in understanding how they ascribe meaning to their practice. However, there is no general consensus on the conceptualization and measurement of physicians’ professional identities. This study developed and validated a values-based scale for measuring physicians’ professional identities. Methods A hybrid research method was used to gather both qualitative and quantitative data. We employed literature review, semi-structured interview, Q-sorting exercise to examine the conceptualization of emergency physicians’ professional identities and to initially develop a 40-item scale. A panel of five experts assessed the scale’s content validity. Using 150 emergency physicians as our sample, we conducted Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) to test the fit of our hypothesised four-factor model based on our preliminary findings. Results Initial CFA suggested revisions to the model. Following theoretical assumptions and modification indices, the model was revised and adjusted to a four-factor 20 item Emergency Physicians Professional Identities Value Scale (EPPIVS) with acceptable fit statistics χ2 = 389.38, df = 164, Normed χ2 = 2.374, GFI = 0.788, CFI = 0.862, RMSEA = 0.096. The Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s Omega reliability and composite reliability of the subscales ranged from α: 0.748 to 0.868, Omega: 0.759 to 0.868 and CR: 0.748 to 0.851, respectively. Conclusion The results indicate that the EPPIVS is a valid and reliable scale for measuring physicians’ professional identities. Further research on the sensitivity of this instrument to important changes over career progression in emergency medicine is warranted.

BackgroundRecent changes in medical education calls for a shift toward student-centered learning. Therefore, it is imperative that clinical educators transparently assess the work-readiness of their medical residents through entrustment-based supervision decisions toward independent practice. Similarly, it is critical that medical residents are vocal about the quality of supervision and feedback they receive. This study aimed to explore the factors that influence entrustment-based supervision decisions and feedback receptivity by establishing a general consensus among Taiwanese clinical educators and medical residents regarding entrustment decisions and feedback uptake, respectively.MethodsIn Q-methodology studies, a set of opinion statement (i.e., the Q-sample) is generated to represent the phenomenon of interest. To explore the factors that influence entrustment-based supervision decisions and feedback receptivity, a Q-sample was developed using a four-step approach: (1) literature search using electronic databases, such as PubMed and Google Scholar, and interviews with emergency clinical educators and medical residents to generate opinion statements, (2) thematic analysis and grouping using The Model of Trust, the Ready, Wiling, and Able model, and the theory of self-regulated learning, (3) translation, and (4) application of a Delphi technique, including two expert panels comprised of clinical educators and medical residents, to establish a consensus of the statements and validation for a subsequent Q-study.ResultsA total of 585 and 1,039 statements from the literature search and interviews were extracted to populate the sample of statements (i.e., the concourse) regarding entrustment-based supervision decisions for clinical educators and feedback receptivity emergency medicine residents, respectively. Two expert panels were invited to participate in a Delphi Technique, comprised of 11 clinical educators and 13 medical residents. After two-rounds of a Delphi technique, the panel of clinical educators agreed on 54 statements on factors that influence entrustment-based supervision decisions and were categorized into five themes defined by the Model of Trust. Similarly, a total of 60 statements on the factors that influence feedback receptivity were retained by the panel of medical residents and were categorized into five themes defined by the Ready, Willing, and Able model and the theory of self-regulated learning.ConclusionThough not exhaustive, the key factors agreed upon by clinical educators and medical residents reflect the characteristics of entrustment-based supervision decisions and feedback receptivity across specialties. This study provides insight on an often overlooked issue of the paths to teaching and learning in competency-based residency training programs. Additionally, incorporation of the Delphi technique further adds to the existing literature and puts emphasis as an important tool that can be used in medical education to rigorously validate Q-statements and develop Q-samples in various specialties.