BackgroundAppendiceal neoplasms are rare and generally determined in appendectomy specimens for acute appendicitis. Depending on a tumor’s histopathology and size, appendectomy or right hemicolectomy are the surgical treatment options. Adenocarcinomas, mucinous neoplasms, goblet cell carcinoids and neuroendocrine tumors are the types of the primary appendiceal neoplasm histopathology. In this study, we aimed to determine the incidence of appendiceal neoplasms in an acute appendicitis cohort. Also, histopathological distributions, demographic data, preoperative radiological diagnosis, and intraoperative findings were revealed for analysis, retrospectively.Material/MethodsBetween October 2011 and September 2017, 3554 appendectomies were performed for acute appendicitis in Bezmialem University Hospital, Istanbul Turkey. The medical records of these consecutive 3554 patients were evaluated retrospectively. After the histopathological analysis of the appendectomy specimens, a total of 28 patients were detected as having appendiceal neoplasm including appendiceal adenocarcinoma, low grade mucinous neoplasia, and appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors.ResultsAppendiceal neoplasms were determined in 28 out of 3554 acute appendicitis patients with an incidence of 0.78%. According to the histopathological types, 3 of the cases (10.7%) were appendiceal adenocarcinoma, 8 of the cases (28.5%) were low grade mucinous neoplasia, and 17 of the cases (60.8%) were neuroendocrine tumors. The overall incidence of the appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors was 0.48%.ConclusionsThe information obtained from our study suggests that pathological examination of the specimen may not be necessary if there is no doubt according to preoperative radiological diagnosis and/or intraoperative findings of the surgeon.

Acute appendicitis is the most common emergency surgical condition. Although most of the resected appendectomy specimens showed typical histopathologic findings, some (1.66%) showed unusual histopathologic findings. Even if the macroscopic appearance of the specimen is normal or acute appendicitis, we suggest routine histopathological examination.

Portal vein thrombosis is a relatively rare but well-known complication of cirrhosis that has a prevalence of between 1% and 5.7%. On the contrary, in case of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), it is a much more frequent complication. In this paper, we presented three cases that had liver cirrhosis, mass and portal vein thrombosis in liver. We were not able to diagnose the cases through imaging methods, laboratory results or histopathologically, however, they were diagnosed with endoscopic ultrasonography- fine needle aspiration EUS-FNA from portal vein thrombus.

Our findings suggested that p16 and p21 may be of value as an adjunct to conventional morphologic criteria in the assessment of problematic uterine smooth muscle tumors.

IntroductionInflammatory myofibroblastic tumor as a rare neoplastic lesion is seen most commonly in the pulmonary system. Beside the presence of limited number of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors of the gastrointestinal tract in the literature, co-existence with acute appendicitis has not been reported before.Presentation of caseA 27-year-old woman admitted to emergency department with acute abdominal pain at the right lower quadrant. The initial diagnosis was as acute appendicitis. Intraoperatively, a mass with a diameter of almost 5 cm originated from the distal ileal segments neighboring the appendix was seen. The patient was managed by segmental resection of the small intestine including the mass with appendectomy. Histologically, there were bundles of spindle cells accompanied by lymphoplasmocytic infiltration. The immunohistochemical studies showed that tumor cells were positive for smooth muscle actin, vimentin, perinuclear activity for anaplastic lymphoma kinase and CD 68. The final pathologic diagnosis was inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor.DiscussionConcomitant resection of tumoral lesions detected in the neighbor intestinal segments during appendectomy should be considered to diagnose and treat.For the diagnosis of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, immunohistochemistry pattern including positivity for actin, vimentin, CD 68 and anaplastic lymphoma kinase plays a crucial role. Therefore, detailed immunohistochemistry analysis should be performed in suspicious cases.ConclusionCoexistence of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor located in the gastrointestinal system with acute appendicitis is a rare event. Complete surgical excision should be regarded as the mainstay of the treatment. Long-term follow up with serial imaging techniques is recommended.