Occurrence and distribution of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), organophosphate pesticides (OPPs), and pyrethroid pesticides (PYRs) residues in the leafy vegetables were analyzed together with the soil samples using gas chromatography-electron capture detector. Edible tissues of vegetables showed detectable residues of these compounds indicating the influence of the conventional farms and nearby organic farms. In the vegetables, the OCPs concentrations were recorded as nd-133.3 ng/g, OPPs as nd-200 ng/g, and PYRs as nd-33.3 ng/g. In the soil, the OCPs concentrations were recorded as nd-30.6 ng/g, OPPs as nd-26.6 ng/g, and for PYRs as nd-6.7 ng/g. Bioconcentration factor (BCF) was higher for the OPPs (0.3) than the OCPs and PYRs (1.1). The OCPs concentration in the vegetables decreased in the following order: spinach > celery > broccoli > cauliflower > cabbage > lettuce > mustard. For OPPs, the concentration decreased in the following order: cauliflower > spinach > celery > cabbage > broccoli > lettuce > mustard and for PYRs as spinach > celery > lettuce > cabbage > broccoli. Principal component analysis indicates that the sources of these pesticides are not the same, and the pesticide application on the vegetables depends on the type of crop. There is a significant positive correlation between OPPs and the soil (r = 0.65) as compared to OCPs and PYRs (r = 0.1) as the vegetables accumulated OPPs more efficiently than OCPs and PYRs.
This study developed a simple flow injection (FI) method based on diperiodatonickelate(IV)-sulfuric acid reaction using chemiluminescence (CL) detection for the determination of thiram (THI) fungicide in fresh water using quinine as the sensitizer. The possible mechanism of the CL reaction was described using UV-Vis. absorption and CL spectra. Experimental variables were optimized by applying a univariate approach, and a linear calibration curve was obtained in the range of 1.0 Â 10 À3 -2.0 mg L À1 (R 2 = 0.9994, n = 9) with a limit of detection of 5.0 Â 10 À4 mg L À1 (S/N = 3) and an injection throughput of 200 h À1 . This approach was successfully applied to determine THI in fresh water by using solid-phase extraction and achieved a good recovery rate of 94%-110% with a relative standard deviation of 1.9%-3.7% (n = 4). The results obtained were compared with the reported FI-CL and high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet methods, and the three methods did not differ significantly at the 95% confidence limit.
Diperiodatoargentate(III) (DPA)/silver(III) complex, [Ag(HIO6)2] 5-, in sulfuric acid medium has been used to determine hyoscine butylbromide (HBB) by flow injection (FI) coupled with chemiluminescence (CL) detector. A linear standard curve between the CL intensity and concentration range from 0.005 to 20 mg L -1 was obtained. The determination coefficient (R 2 ), limit of detection (3s × blank), relative standard deviation (RSD) for 0.5 mg L -1 HBB and analytical throughput were 0.9992 (n = 8), 5 × 10 -4 mg L -1 , 1.5% (n = 10) and 160 injections h -1 , respectively. The developed method was applied for the determination of HBB in pharmaceutical formulations with recoveries from 92 ± 4 to 108 ± 3%. For comparison, a spectrophotometric method was used and the results obtained by both methods were in good agreement at a 95% confidence level. The effect of key chemical and physical variables (reagent concentration, flow rate, sample volume, PMT voltage) and interfering species (pharmaceutical excipients and inorganic ions) on the determination of HBB was examined. The possible CL mechanism of HBB on silver(III) complex in sulfuric acid medium was also discussed in brief.Keywords Chemiluminescence, flow injection analysis, silver(III) complex, hyoscine butylbromide, pharmaceutical formulations
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.