Many agencies responsible for managing pavements have adopted pavement management systems (PMS) to help manage their pavement networks more cost-effectively. One of the most costly parts of operating a PMS is collecting condition information, especially pavement distress information. Many agencies have started to contract for pavement distress data collection. Some of the agencies have experienced problems with the data collected by contract. A study for agencies in Washington and Oregon to define the accuracy of data needed by the agencies with an evaluation of certain participating vendors using semiautomated data collection methods is described. Issues about quality control and quality assurance faced by agencies considering contracting for automated data collection also are raised. These issues need additional study to develop appropriate guidelines. The initial set provided is based on discussions with some of the agencies currently contracting for pavement distress data collection.
Many local agencies in the San Francisco Bay Area in California use manual surveys to collect pavement distress data to calculate pavement condition index (PCI) values for use in pavement management. Many of these agencies then use pavement performance curves and trigger values in their decision trees or matrices based on these resulting PCI values and derived parameters as major components of the agencies’ pavement management decision support systems. Automated pavement distress data collection procedures are available, but all available procedures and equipment do not necessarily reproduce the PCI from manual surveys. These differences in the PCI calculated from different distress data collection methods can lead to substantially different pavement treatment recommendations and fund needs. A 2-year project was conducted for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission of the San Francisco Bay Area to evaluate the effect of the use of different methods to determine the PCI. The study included statistical analyses and comparison of seven pavement distress types for asphalt pavements and the resulting PCI. The methodology, interpretation, and findings from the study are described. Emphasis is given to differences observed in the results and analysis of their causes. Practical recommendations for future use of automated pavement distress data collection procedures for local agencies are given.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.