The article reveals the issues of space exploration by private entities who have intensified their efforts in space activities. The US and Luxembourg legal regulations, which both govern the private sector involvement in State space activities and allow citizens to freely engage in the development of planets and asteroids, to own and dispose of resources, including water and minerals, are under analysis. Therefore, due to the occurrence of legal collisions, the International Law Association and the Space Law Committee, established on its basis, should influence regulating space issues. These institutions are known for their open policies and extensive external relations. Their key mission is to study, clarify and develop international public and private law and prepare comparative law research. The author concludes that being an important human resource, space objects and natural resources should belong to all humanity, not to individual States or private enterprises. The adoption of the US and Luxembourg legislation on legalizing, extracting, using and appropriating space resources by private enterprises seems to be in full compliance with international obligations, however, in fact they violate the principles governing the activities of States in the exploration and use of outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, which are not subject to national appropriation, neither by proclaiming sovereignty, nor by uses or occupation, nor by any other means.
The article’s purpose is to analyze prospects for innovative development of entrepreneurship and generalize main directions of Ukraine’s state innovation policy. Research methods are: monographic analysis, system analysis, comparativelegal analysis, generalization, forecasting, etc. We substantiated the necessity for elaborating and implementing effective measures aimed at developing innovative entrepreneurship and increasing country’s innovative potential due to the improvement of legal tools of the state policy for developing innovative entrepreneurship. We emphasized that there is possibility to develop Ukraine’s potential of innovative entrepreneurship and strengthen commercialization of innovations due to the current legislation’simprovement, particularly through implementing European law norms into the national legal system. It is proven that the effective implementation of scientific technical progress achievements can occur only under condition of establishing cooperation between scientific and educational institutions and enterprises; due to well-chosen financial, organizational and regulatory measures to support innovations’ development and commercialization. It is concluded that formation of Ukraine’s modern innovation policyshould be based on the modernization of enterprises, active attraction of investments through participation in national and international projects, integration of information technologies into the production sphere and effective management solutions aimedat our state’s participation in global innovation processes.
In accordance with the current legislation of Ukraine, the state provides funding and appropriate conditions for the functioning of courts and the activities of judges, which provides for a separate determination in the State Budget of Ukraine of expenses for the maintenance of courts not lower than the level that ensures the possibility of full and independent administration of justice in accordance with the law. In Ukraine, there is a single system of ensuring the functioning of the judiciary - courts, bodies of judicial governance, other state bodies and institutions of the justice system. This means that the functioning of the judicial branch of power is impossible without the functioning of the system of authorized state bodies defined by laws and other legal acts, as well as other subjects when they exercise public-power management functions on the basis of legislation, including the implementation of delegated powers to carry out public administration, the purpose of which is the organization, coordination and practical activities of persons exercising administrative powers aimed at ensuring the proper functioning of the judiciary as a whole. For this purpose, the article analyzes the works of scientists who researched the issue of management relations and the activity of public court administration, as well as the provisions of the Laws of Ukraine «On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges», «On Civil Service», the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine, which made it possible to clarify the circle of subjects of power and non-power authority, as well as to determine the system of ensuring the functioning of the judiciary. In view of the analyzed legislative and other regulatory legal acts, it is emphasized that in certain cases, subjects of public administration can also act as subjects of public administration. It was concluded that the organizational and administrative activities of public administration are carried out by a wide range of subjects of public administration, whose activities are regulated by laws and other normative legal acts and are aimed at effective support of the work of courts (judges).
Ukraine’s accession to the European political, economic, informational and legal space encourages the state, executive bodies, local self-government bodies and other subjects of public administration in relations with citizens to adhere to the priority of human and civil rights and freedoms. In modern conditions, an important role in the relations of citizens and legal entities with the subjects of public administration is played by public service activities of executive bodies and local governments, as well as subjects of delegated powers, which in accordance with current regulations provide various services. Legislation and bylaws are analyzed. In particular, a study of the Laws of Ukraine: «On Consumer Protection», «On Public Procurement», «On the use of registrars of settlement transactions in trade, catering and services», «On free legal aid», «On administrative services», «On social services», «On the provision of public (electronic public) services for the declaration and registration of residence in Ukraine», as well as the Tax Code of Ukraine. The international legal acts that had a significant impact on the formation of domestic legislation and the activities of public administration in the field of providing various types of services are analyzed. The study of legislative acts and bylaws gave grounds to establish that depending on the specifics of the regulation of public relations in the analyzed regulations use different definitions of «services», as well as terminological and cognitive aspects, organizational principles of business entities , in particular, relating to the provision of services, requirements and procedures for the provision of services, determining the rights and obligations of the subject of provision and the customer of the service. Attention is drawn to the fact that in case of poor-quality administrative services, citizens of Ukraine and foreigners protect the violated rights in the administrative court. The need to develop a normative act, which should be a framework for public administration, to protect the rights and legitimate interests of all parties to the relationship in the provision and receipt of various services.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.