Lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) is a bioactive proinflammatory lipid that can be generated by pathological activities. We investigated the hypothesis that LPC signals increase in endothelial permeability. Stimulation of human dermal microvascular endothelial cells and bovine pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells with LPC (10 -50 M) induced decreases (within minutes) in transendothelial electrical resistance and increase of endothelial permeability. LPC activated (within 5 min) membraneassociated PKC phosphotransferase activity in the absence of translocation. Affinity-binding analysis indicated that LPC induced increases (also by 5 min) of GTP-bound RhoA, but not Rac1 or Cdc42. By 60 min, both signaling pathways decreased toward baseline. Inhibition of RhoA with C3 transferase inhibited ϳ50% of LPCinduced resistance decrease. Pretreatment with PKC inhibitor Gö-6983 (concentrations selective for classic PKC), PMA-induced depletion of PKC␣, and transfection of antisense PKC␣ oligonucleotide each prevented 40 -50% of the LPC-induced resistance decrease. Furthermore, these three PKC inhibition strategies inhibited 60 -80% of the LPC-induced GTP-bound RhoA. These results show that LPC directly impairs the endothelial barrier function that was dependent, at least in part, on cross talk of PKC␣ and RhoA signals. The evidence indicates that elevated LPC levels can contribute to the activation of a proinflammatory endothelial phenotype. protein kinase C; signal transduction LYSOPHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE (LPC) belongs to a group of bioactive glycerol-or sphingosine-based lysophospholipids [i.e., lysophosphatidic acid, sphingosine-1-phosphate, and sphingosylphosphorylcholine (SPC)] generated from membrane phospholipids as part of normal physiological activities or disease processes. It has been found to accumulate in pathological tissues such as in the ischemic myocardium, atherosclerotic aortas, and other inflammatory lesions of blood vessels (5, 33). LPC is also a major phospholipid component (40 -50%) of oxidized LDL (17) and is implicated as a critical atherogenic factor of oxidized LDL. Several diseases such as endometriosis (22), asthma (18), and ovarian cancer (26) are associated with two-to threefold increased circulating levels of LPC. It is believed that a primary source of pathological levels of LPC is through the action of phospholipase A 2 (PLA 2 ) on membrane phosphatidylcholine, generating LPC concomitantly with arachidonic acid (2,16,32,35). Despite these documented elevations of LPC in association with pathological conditions, the pathophysiological role of LPC in diseases remains to be established.There is clear evidence that the bioactive activities of LPC include activation of vascular endothelium. For example, extracellular LPC (10 -100 M) is reported to upregulate expression of adhesion molecules (8,21,40), production of cytokines (23), secretion of O 2 Ϫ (7), and DNAbinding activity of . In vivo studies show that direct LPC injection either subcutaneously (31) or into the spinal cord (27) causes inflamma...
The atherogenic serum lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) is known to mediate vascular endothelial responses ranging from upregulation of adhesion molecules and growth factors to secretion of chemokines and superoxide anion. We investigated whether endothelial cells express receptors for LPC, which may account for their actions. Human brain microvascular (HBMEC) and dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC) were prepared for RT-PCR analysis for possible expression of the G protein-coupled receptors, GPR4 and G2A, which are believed to be specific LPC receptors. Results indicated that HBMEC expressed low basal GPR4 mRNA, but stimulation with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) (100 U/ml) or H2O2 (50 micromol/l) for 2 h or overnight upregulated expression severalfold. In contrast, HMEC expressed high basal GPR4 mRNA, which was not further increased by either TNF-alpha or H2O2 stimulation. Another LPC receptor, G2A, was not detected in either endothelial cell type. Competition binding studies were made to evaluate specific binding of [3H]LPC to the intact endothelial cell monolayer. Basal specific [3H]LPC binding in HBMEC was approximately eight times lower than in HMEC; however, TNF-alpha or H2O2 stimulation increased [3H]LPC binding on HMBEC but not HMEC. The results indicated that GPR4 expression was consistent with specific [3H]LPC binding. Overall, we report that endothelial cells selectively expressed GPR4, a specific LPC receptor. Furthermore, GPR4 expression by HBMEC, but not HMEC, was increased by inflammatory stresses. We conclude that endogenous GPR4 in endothelial cells may be a potential G protein-coupled receptor by which LPC signals proinflammatory activities.
Resveratrol, a dietary phytoalexin, has emerged as a promising chemopreventive agent due to its antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic action toward cancer cells and its ability to inhibit tumor growth in animals. Gastric adenocarcinoma cells respond to resveratrol treatment with suppression of DNA synthesis, activation of nitric oxide synthase, induction of apoptosis and inhibition of total PKC and PKC alpha activity. Here we demonstrate that treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma SNU-1 cells with resveratrol results in time and concentration dependent accumulation of tumor suppressors p21(cip1/WAF-1) and p53 and is preceded by loss of membrane-associated PKC delta protein and a concomitant increase in cytosolic PKC alpha. Arrest of the cell cycle at transition of S to G(2)/M phases correlates with the profile of (3)H-thymidine incorporation and accumulation of p21(cip1/WAF-1) and was temporally dependent on increase of p53. SNU-1 cells respond to resveratrol treatment with up-regulation of both Fas and Fas-L proteins, whereas in KATO-III cells, with deleted p53, only Fas-L is increased after resveratrol treatment. Although Fas and Fas-L proteins in SNU-1 cells and Fas-L in KATO-III cells were elevated within 24 h of cell treatment with low concentrations of resveratrol, significant apoptotic response at these concentrations was observed only after 48 h. Altogether, our findings indicate that resveratrol engages PKC alpha and delta signals in gastric adenocarcinoma SNU-1 cells prior to up-regulation of antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic signals. The specific cell death signals engaged by resveratrol appear to be cell type dependent and suggest that resveratrol has chemopreventive potential even after mutational changes have occurred.
The cAMP-PKA cascade is a recognized signaling pathway important in inhibition of inflammatory injury events such as endothelial permeability and leucocyte trafficking, and a critical target of regulation is believed to be inhibition of Rho proteins. Here, we hypothesize that PKA directly phosphorylates GTP dissociation inhibitor (GDI) to negatively regulate Rho activity. Amino acid analysis of GDIalpha showed two potential protein kinase A (PKA) phosphorylation motifs, Ser(174) and Thr(182). Using in vitro kinase assay and mass spectrometry, we found that the purified PKA catalytic subunit phosphorylated GDIalpha-GST fusion protein and PKA motif-containing GDIalpha peptide at Ser(174), but not Thr(182). Transfection of COS-7 cells with mutated full-length GDIalpha at Ser(174) to Ala(174) (GDIalpha-Ser(174A)) abrogated the ability of cAMP to phosphorylate GDIalpha. However, mutation of Thr(182) to Ala(182) (GDIalpha-Thr(182A)) did not abrogate, and cAMP increased phosphorylation of GDIalpha to a similar extent as wild-type GDIalpha transfectants. The mutant GDIalpha-Ser(174A), but not GDIalpha-Thr(182A), was unable to prevent cAMP-mediated inhibition of Rho-dependent serum-response element reporter activity. Furthermore, the mutant GDIalpha-Ser(174A) was unable to prevent the thrombin-induced RhoA activation. Coprecipitation studies indicated that neither mutation of the PKA consensus sites nor phosphorylation alter GDIalpha binding with RhoA, suggesting that phosphorylation of Ser(174) regulated preformed GDIalpha-RhoA complexes. The findings provide strong support that the selective phosphorylation at Ser(174) by PKA is a signaling pathway in the negative regulation of RhoA activity and therefore could be a potential protective mechanism for inflammatory injury.
Resveratrol is a dietary phytochemical that has been shown to inhibit proliferation of a number of cell lines, and it behaves as a chemopreventive agent in assays that measure the three stages of carcinogenesis. We tested for its chemopreventive potential against gastric cancer by determining its interaction with signaling mechanisms that contribute to the proliferation of transformed cells. Low levels of exogenous reactive oxygen (H(2)O(2)) stimulated [(3)H]thymidine uptake in human gastric adenocarcinoma SNU-1 cells, whereas resveratrol suppressed both synthesis of DNA and generation of endogenous O(2)(-) but stimulated nitric oxide (NO) synthase (NOS) activity. To address the role of NO in the antioxidant action of resveratrol, we measured the effect of sodium nitroprusside (SNP), an NO donor, on O(2)(-) generation and on [(3)H]thymidine incorporation. SNP inhibited DNA synthesis and suppressed ionomycin-stimulated O(2)(-) generation in a concentration-dependent manner. Our results revealed that the antioxidant action of resveratrol toward gastric adenocarcinoma SNU-1 cells may reside in its ability to stimulate NOS to produce low levels of NO, which, in turn, exert antioxidant action. Resveratrol-induced inhibition of SNU-1 proliferation may be partly dependent on NO formation, and we hypothesize that resveratrol exerts its antiproliferative action by interfering with the action of endogenously produced reactive oxygen. These data are supportive of the action of NO against reactive oxygen and suggest that a resveratrol-rich diet may be chemopreventive against gastric cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.