The purpose of this study was to determine risk indicators for the aetiology of abfractions (cervical wedge-shaped defects) on teeth using dental and medical variables obtained in a population-based sample of the cross-sectional epidemiological 'Study of Health in Pomerania' (SHIP). Medical history, dental, and sociodemographic parameters of 2707 representatively selected subjects 20-59 years of age with more than four natural teeth were checked for associations with the occurrence of abfractions using a two-level logistic regression model on a tooth and a subject level. The estimated prevalence of developing abfractions generally increased with age. The following independent variables were associated with the occurrence of abfractions: buccal recession of the gingiva, odds ratio (OR) = 6.7; occlusal wear facets of scores 1, 2 and 3, OR = 1.5, 1.9, 1.9; tilted teeth, OR = 1.4; inlays, OR = 1.6; toothbrushing behaviour, OR = 1.9 to 2.0 (two and three times a day versus once a day). First premolars had the highest estimated risk for developing abfractions, followed by the second premolars. Maxillary and mandibular teeth behaved similarly in terms of abfractions, with the exception of mandibular canines, which had a much lower estimated risk of incurring abfractions than did maxillary canines. The results of this analysis indicated that abfractions are associated with occlusal factors, like occlusal wear, inlay restorations, altered tooth position and tooth brushing behaviour. This study delivers further evidence for a multifactorial aetiology of abfractions.
This study investigated the prevalence of a preferred chewing side (PCS) and associations between a PCS and signs of temporomandibular disorders (TMD), antagonist contact and prosthetic restoration. A population representative sample of 4086 adults of the cross-sectional epidemiologic 'Study of Health in Pomerania' (SHIP-0) (age range 20-80 years, female 50.2%) was divided in two groups by the presence or absence of a PCS. PCS was evaluated by a questionnaire. Chi-squared tests and multiple logistic regression were used to determine the impact of the relation between a PCS and signs and symptoms of TMD as well as dental factors. The prevalence of a PCS was 45.4%. Women between 40 and 69 years reported more frequently a PCS. There was a preference for the right side (64%). The following independent variables were significantly associated with a PCS: subjective unilateral pain in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), odds ratio (OR) 2.4; subjective unilateral joint clicking, OR 1.7; unilateral TMJ/muscle pain on palpation, OR 1.6/OR 1.3; loss of one supporting zone (Eichner-Classification), OR 1.9; loss of both supporting zones on one side, OR 2.2, one supporting zone left, OR 1.4; presence of a removable partial denture, OR 1.6; presence of an attachment restoration, OR 1.5. A PCS was found in almost half the study population and was associated with unilateral signs of TMD, most of all TMJ pain and asymmetrical loss of antagonist contact. Despite replacement of lost teeth not all restorations seemed to support bilateral mastication.
The literature has documented a controversial discussion on the possible relationship of otogenous symptoms and craniomandibular dysfunction since the 1920s. Therefore, an investigation was conducted which consisted of two parts: a case study with population-based controls and a cross-sectional study. The aim of the first study was to screen a group of patients suffering from acute or chronic tinnitus for temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in comparison with a population-based group of volunteers without tinnitus. To this end, 30 patients (13 females and 17 males, age 18-71 years) suffering from acute hearing loss associated with tinnitus, isolated acute tinnitus, and chronically transient tinnitus were examined for symptoms of craniomandibular dysfunction. The results were compared with those of clinical functional analysis from 1907 subjects selected representatively and according to age distribution from the epidemiological 'Study of Health in Pomerania' (SHIP); the occurrence of tinnitus was ruled out in these control subjects. Statistical analysis was performed with Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U-tests. Sixty per cent of the tinnitus patients and 36.5% of the control subjects exhibited more than two symptoms of TMD (P = 0.004). Tinnitus patients had significantly more muscle palpation pain (P < 0.001), temporomandibular joint (TMJ) palpation pain (P < 0.001), and pain upon mouth opening (P < 0.001) than the general population group. No statistical differences were found in TMJ sounds, limitation of mandibular movement, or hypermobility of the TMJ. Furthermore, 4228 subjects of the population group examined in the epidemiological study were screened for co-factors of tinnitus with the help of a multivariate logistic regression model which was adjusted for gender, age, and a variety of anamnestic and examined data. Increased odds ratios (OR) were found for tenderness of the masticatory muscles (OR = 1.6 for one to three painful muscles and OR = 2.53 for four or more painful muscles), TMJ tenderness to dorsal cranial compression (OR = 2.99), listlessness (OR = 2.0) and frequent headache (OR = 1.84) A relationship between tinnitus and TMD was established in both examinations. Tinnitus patients seem to suffer especially from myofascial and TMJ pain. A screening for TMD should be included in the diagnostic survey for tinnitus patients.
There is a gene-environmental interaction between smoking and the IL-1 genetic polymorphism. Smokers bearing the genotype-positive IL-1 allele combination have an increased risk of periodontitis. The IL-1 genotype has no influence in non-smokers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.